jayjackson
Proud Member
Could someone upload it on youtube please?
I will! When I have downloaded part 2 and 3 of the documentary...
Could someone upload it on youtube please?
What did he say? Please tell.The documentary included an interesting interviews with the man who created those beautiful portraits of Michael
What did he say? Please tell.
sorry I can't remember off memory apart from him saying "My relationship with Michael was professional, but he was also my friend" Or something like that. Im sure it will be online soon.
On another note, the guy with the rare recording. Isn't this the same guy who started the "MJ bleaches his skin" stories. Cos I remember the first time I heard it was cos someone had found a tube of skin bleach in a case supposedly belonging to MJ...and this dude said that he had a tube of skin bleach found in a case... Am I the only one who put 2 and 2 together?
* edit * I've only watched the first 3 minutes of it and already I can see that this is just another smear campaign/money makin' piece and I'm done with it
If anyone can stomach the whole thing and find something interesting, let me know which part/time please.
Michael Jackson For Sale Part 1
Michael Jackson For Sale Part 2
Michael Jackson For Sale Part 3
Again i wont watch this footage , the general update here dont seems good for me , yeah "ill be there ..;" etc...are good images ,but what they say is what matters , and thats what the great public will remember not the footage and the exclusive "ill be there..." images .
I wont watch it , seems too much negative for me ..
Geez it wasn't that bad I don't think.
They didn't even hint he did any of the things he is accused of nor did they allege he was a "freak."
If anything they just showed that it is amazing what a person can buy given the wealth that this man as got (they even said this at the beginning).
As for the Rabbi, I don't think he said anything negative at all. All he said was that MJ had/has some issues in his life that he had/has to deal with...like we all do!!
Furthermore, it wasn't like Diane Dimond, Roger Friedman, Carol Liberman and that other b*tch (her name escapes me, but she is the lawyer who always tried to takes MJ's kids away from him) etc... were interviewed.
All the interviewees were people who have worked/done a service for Michael. I.e. Painters, PR people, former advisors, shop owners, auctioneers etc...
Sure it wasn't 100% positive like, say, the Number Ones TV Special, and there were a couple of innaccuracies such as 2m Invincible sales but to say it was a smear campaign is a little far fetching I think. After all, they did say Thriller made MJ 100s of millions of dollars, that he got $95m from the merger of ATV and Sony Publishing (which is about right), made $125m on the Bad Tour, renewed his contract with Sony in 1991 for $65m, bought Neverland in 1988 for $17m, got a $18m advance for the Dangerous album and a $5m bonus and sold 30m copies of Bad and Dangerous.
I'm wondering if the fans who say it is a smear campaigned watched the same show as I did!
You are entitled to your opinion.
Do they really have to go there for it to be considered negative???
I'm beginning to wonder if some fans have gotten so used to the negativity when it comes to Michael, they overlook it for the sake of a few chosen facts that can't be denied, just to observe something, ANYthing MJ related. Well that ain't good enough for me! I want the truth and nothing but the darn truth or I'm not interested. I'm sick and tired of the negativity wrapped in smear; even 90% truth surrounded by 10% of lies and/or negativity, is still BS/smear in my book, particularly when it comes to Michael.
At this point there ain't nothing negative about the man the world ain't already heard way too many times already. Tell me somethin' positive, somethin' I haven't already heard, or shut the hell up! That's how I feel.
I already viewed the exhibit all over the news & the web, not to mention Julien's web site and most of what they said in those 3 minutes was unecessary...sounds to me like some mo' folk who are holding grudges against the man talkin' mo' trash under the disguise of displayin' the exhibit. So what was the REAL purpose of the doc???
M-O-N-E-Y and negativity, period.
Just my 10 cents.
I totally understand what you're saying and I do agree with you. My original thoughts were to not watch it, but I had a boring night last night and I sky+d it so thought I would give it a shot. It's a shame that it's got to the point where like I posted before I'm ignoring the bad things when they're not so bad, when compared with the benchmark set before by negative documentaries. It's sad.
Fair enough, but can you please offer an example of what you thought was out of line or totally negative?