No doubt if "2000 Watts" was an unreleased song that just saw the light of day now it would be in the same boat as the Cascio tracks.
Forget about bloody Jason whatever, he has nothing to do with this project, only the very dimest of the dim think it's him.
Stop this guys... we now have the proof that it's not him on all Cascio tracks.
Stop denying just to stick with your opinion.. it's nonsensical!
There is no shame in changing his mind...
Stop this guys... we now have the proof that it's not him on all Cascio tracks.
Stop denying just to stick with your opinion.. it's nonsensical!
There is no shame in changing his mind...
Stop this guys... we now have the proof that it's not him on all Cascio tracks.
Stop denying just to stick with your opinion.. it's nonsensical!
There is no shame in changing his mind...
what proof are you talking about? is this going to be another round of "my proof is MY EARS", or "my mother (father, friends etc) said so"? what I don't understand is why all of you - those who think that the songs are fake - feel the need to convince the rest of us that you are right? why can't you just be comfortable in your own opinion without writing about it over and over again in every thread? I admit, everyone has a right to have their opinion but is it really necessary to go on and on and on about it all over the forum day after day? I don't see fans who believe the vocals are geniune spam the threads with posts like "it's him, it's him, it's him"! but the "it's not him" posts are everywhere. and all the "it's him" posts appear afterwards as defence. there's not end to this discussion.
can't you just stop talking about it until the album is released? or at least until the oprah interview? and when the album is finally released all of you who don't believe it's Michael can collect money and hire a lawyer and sue Sony.
Yes, and there is no song MJ has ever released with even ONE fan questioning if it's him singing. Yet these all caused a divide. Not one, not two, not ten, but hundreds of us on this forum ALONE think its NOT Michael Jackson.
what proof are you talking about? is this going to be another round of "my proof is MY EARS", or "my mother (father, friends etc) said so"? what I don't understand is why all of you - those who think that the songs are fake - feel the need to convince the rest of us that you are right? why can't you just be comfortable in your own opinion without writing about it over and over again in every thread? I admit, everyone has a right to have their opinion but is it really necessary to go on and on and on about it all over the forum day after day? I don't see fans who believe the vocals are geniune spam the threads with posts like "it's him, it's him, it's him"! but the "it's not him" posts are everywhere. and all the "it's him" posts appear afterwards as defence. there's not end to this discussion.
can't you just stop talking about it until the album is released? or at least until the oprah interview? and when the album is finally released all of you who don't believe it's Michael can collect money and hire a lawyer and sue Sony.
Why? Because we feel the duty to defend his legacy.. I guess..what I don't understand is why all of you - those who think that the songs are fake - feel the need to convince the rest of us that you are right? why can't you just be comfortable in your own opinion without writing about it over and over again in every thread?
I am so tired of coming to the forum to the same arguing...................... *sigh*
of course there is.. and I invite anybody who wants to chat about it. I'm ready to spend time to explain step by step why it cannot be him. But I'll not fight on forums...There is no proof of anything. So just stop this please.
what proof are you talking about? is this going to be another round of "my proof is MY EARS", or "my mother (father, friends etc) said so"? what I don't understand is why all of you - those who think that the songs are fake - feel the need to convince the rest of us that you are right? why can't you just be comfortable in your own opinion without writing about it over and over again in every thread? I admit, everyone has a right to have their opinion but is it really necessary to go on and on and on about it all over the forum day after day? I don't see fans who believe the vocals are geniune spam the threads with posts like "it's him, it's him, it's him"! but the "it's not him" posts are everywhere. and all the "it's him" posts appear afterwards as defence. there's not end to this discussion.
can't you just stop talking about it until the album is released? or at least until the oprah interview? and when the album is finally released all of you who don't believe it's Michael can collect money and hire a lawyer and sue Sony.
Where can i order the HMH single from?
Why? Because we feel the duty to defend his legacy.. I guess..
of course there is.. and I invite anybody who wants to chat about it. I'm ready to spend time to explain step by step why it cannot be him. But I'll not fight on forums...
If you don't like the background vocals added to these tracks,If that is MJ then i'm f*cking Tito!
It breaks my heart to listen to these Cascio tracks.
Why? Because we feel the duty to defend his legacy.. I guess..
These are all fan clubs that don't think it's Michael on the cascio tracks?Me and many fan clubs are with your opinion:
then write to the Estate or Sony. you don't have to defend his legacy against us. We are his fans too, you know.
chats are time consuming. why don't you write a nice big post with your arguments and we'll discuss them? without fighting and arguing, only a civil discussion. that is of course if you do really have the proof.