he left in 03.all material recorded after that date is own sorely by the estate. sony have the right to music up to next year.after that the estate own it all if the estate didnt want to deal with sony they would have had to wait until when ever it is in 2011 that they get them backWas Michael still a free agent before he passed or was he still signed with Sony?
Good news about new music.
Still I don't know..since Michael's demonstration against Sony and the whole Killer Thriller speech etc. that he made against them... well, I'm uncomfortable. Also I hope the estate does not sell them Michael's half of the catalogue.
Yay Sony that's right, milk'em for all they got! Am I the only one who just feels sick after reading this news? I know this is all about business, but shoot, they could have at least had the decency to wait a whole year before striking their oh-so-fancy deal that Michael will never benefit from... Seeing how fast they went about capitalising on This is it, I guess I shouldn't be surprised. I don't feel excited in the least bit.
Be VERY careful of those who talk the loudest and post the most for they are those who would have you believe it's 2001 & that releases, numerous realeases after 2002 didn't happen. Fact is they did, willingly. Fact is he was talking to Sony before he died, with new music, willingly. Those who did him wrong in 2001 at Sony records no longer exist, it was a power struggle at the highest level and the stakes were in the billions. It's senior management trying to make their mark at it's finest but only those who work within the industry could see that it's not about Sony fucking records. It was a handful of dodgy fucks who went out to do him over.
The choices are simple and dead or alive the remain the same
buy it
or don't buy it
but don't fucking sit there and whinge over invincible as the reason why the estate can't sign 200mill deals in a global Economy that is up the shit. Nobody else gonna say it but I will, don't just hate the deal cos it don't feeeel right. Give us facts. If you can't refer above to your options. We are about to get treasures of recordings and if peoplecan go onn and bloody on about Sony then I have the right to wish the estate and Sony all the very best. The estate has done a great job. It's been 9months and they havebrought in hundreds of millions. But I suppose they couldve done better right. Please.
I feel the same. But in keeping with the positive theme of this thread I'm gonna shut up.
Do speak your mind, Stacey. I know the recent trend here has been that one's opinion isn't valued if it's not something positive, but I think everyone should feel free to express how they really feel. I don't understand why "negativity" has become a curseword around here, lol. And why differing opinions are immediately viewed as negative.
I personally don't have a problem with Sony releasing new material. Even though it's bittersweet because Michael isn't here anymore, I'm excited about getting a new album this year! But I don't mind reading different viewpoints, brings more flavor to the conversation.
Wow this is big news. 10 albums in 7 years! I'm looking forward to see what this will bring to us, hoping Sony will not disappoint us.. It's so bittersweet at the same time, though and I have been more excited about other things.. but I want to hear the unreleased tracks.
Did he really?
If so, that would certainly be a very good recipe to deal with this feelings of being a traitor.
But if so... then... why any new music? Was it only because of the "trials"? I know very well what Sony can do. Not only because of Michael, but also because my other favourite, George Michael... He sang it very well in Older, when he finally get out of Sony after so long... "feels good... to be... free"
:mello:
Wow this is big news. 10 albums in 7 years! I'm looking forward to see what this will bring to us, hoping Sony will not disappoint us.. It's so bittersweet at the same time, though and I have been more excited about other things.. but I want to hear the unreleased tracks.
"Also I hope the estate does not sell them ......the catalogue."
I DO agree with you.
For MJ himself and for three children.
It certainly does seem like a GLUT of releases over a 7 year period, especially considering MJ only released every 4 or so years when recording... hope it isn't a string of MAJOR over-hyped releases, or I fear they'll flood the market.
Not 10 albums...10 projects.
Did Branca not make it clear in the AP interview last fall: CATALOGUE IS NOT FOR SALE. People keep mixing news with their own opinions.
No matter how often it is asked (even the new AP & WSJ) stated that fact, there is no need TO SELL THE CATALOGUE. Hope it is clear now.
Rickyd, I cannot quote you because the original post was erased...but I totally agree with EVERYTHING YOU WROTE. Blunt...but true.
MJ's own fans have been creating & spreading lies on the internet...It is sickening. I had almost an hour exchange with an MJ fan this morning claiming that the administrators are making money off producing and everything. I kept telling her that was a lie...she wouldn't budge. I had the pull out the court documents to show her how wrong she was.
MJ's executors are getting 5% of profits each while other estates (Jim Morrisson, Janis Joplin etc) pay as much as 25%. Katherine Jackson thought the compensation rate was fair....the kids' lawyer agreed...The 5% include everything : from using John McClain studios to mix a new album...producing it...and Branca's time negotiating new deals. They get a 5% flat rate.... WTF do fans feel entitled to complain about?
/end of vent
Looking forward to hearing new MJ music...it will be sad, but I will appreciate the chance to hear news tracks from him.
Is it 10 "Albums" or 10 "Projects"?
It might not turn out to be 10 albums perse, it could be 10 projects. For all we know, they could release 1 album of fully unreleased material and the following all having previously released compilations with 1 new song on them. Also, wasn't there talk of 'rock band' style games? These things could be included in the projects planned.
Michael Jackson Estate Signs Sweeping Contract
By BEN SISARIO
Published: March 15, 2010
Nine months after Michael Jackson’s death, his estate has signed one of the biggest recording contracts in history, giving Sony, Mr. Jackson’s longtime label, the rights to sell his back catalog and draw on a large vault of unheard recordings.
LOS ANGELES, March 16 (UPI) -- The estate of Michael Jackson has agreed to a deal allowing the Sony record label to sell the late U.S. pop icon's back catalog of recordings, sources said.
Good news (as good as any Michael news can get I guess) but I'm struggling to think of 10 albums they can release.
I also agree. 7 years is a short time, what are we left with after it? Hopefully not only hundreds of GH collections..I agree. Michael released an album every 5 years! I much prefer that... it makes the next album constantly exciting as we had to wait 5 years for it! Spreading it out would of been keeps better like for every decade a certain amount of albums gets released. Hope there not gonna use up all the material left of Michael jam packed in 7 years... I want his legacy to include releasing new music for decades to come!
I also agree. 7 years is a short time, what are we left with after it? Hopefully not only hundreds of GH collections..