xthunderx2
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2009
- Messages
- 9,883
- Points
- 0
opcorn:
:lmao: am I correct in assuming none of them have any say????
opcorn:
You're right I'll do my best to ignore from now on :huggy:Twinkle I just asked KOPV to not start that issue again. You know that side says the same thing over and over, so why do you allow yourself to respond? Now you know I love you and I value you your comments and will support you, so be strong and do not respond. You are not going to accomplish anything when you engage in this back and forth, because you are both not coming from the same starting point, there is no inclination on either side to be swayed by the other's views, and each has different levels of facts/nonfacts.
I feel if we ignore these statements that tend to burst into the middle of a thread, and does not relate to the issues of the topic, the person who started it cannot continue. Who will they respond to, if no one is answering back? I want you to be the bigger person.
:lmao: am I correct in assuming none of them have any say????
Jermaine is still tweeting about Hayvenhurst. What in the world is really going on?
jermjackson5Jermaine Jackson
I'm starting to suspect Estate, or those around Mother, are trying to exert pressure. They need to shut up. Hayvenhurst's not for sale
5 minutes agoFavoriteRetweetReply
jermjackson5Jermaine Jackson
I've read report that Estate has '"again" confirmed Mother wishes to sell Hayvenhurst. This is untrue. Estate needs to stop talking for her
9 minutes ago
opcorn:
Guess there isn't great communication going on?
Anwser: YES! Jermaine, especially "has no say". :lmao::lmao: am I correct in assuming none of them have any say????
Thanks Twinklee, and as Michael would say "God Bless You"You're right I'll do my best to ignore from now on :huggy:
MOD NOTE _ Please Read
You are certainly allowed to voice you opinion on the topic of this thread
but what is NOT allowed on this board is personal attacks on members or the moderation team.
Any further post like that will be cause for infractions and or banning.
Please adress the topic and leave each other alone if you cant be civil
Also any exessive, blatant RUDE name calling or attacks on Catherine Jackson will be deleted
and those who continue will recieve infractions . Sadly we have become lax on on our rules about the T
TONE on the board and this behaviour Its getting out of hand.
If you have disgreement with her actions Discuss it appropriatly -
Have some class if you will .. Thanks
If you find your post is missing please dont derail this thread complaining. Any such posts
will be deleted - READ above its self explainatory. If you have questions please PM me instead
if you think factual contracts are opinions then i guess you need to read up on contract law and i suggest you go read those contracts instead of living in a state of denial about the facts that are written in them and signed by katherineThe ONLY "fact" Elusive is what an individual thinks of the Jackson family or MJ is OPINION.. And I really don't think anyone here supports the family over Mike himself. It's just hard for some fans to sit and watch other fans talk crap about people that Michael himself never said 1 bad thing about (only spoke highly towards).... Like Michael does not know how his mother opporates and what she would do in specific situations. ESPECIALLY michael, he's known for his observation of people and its his Mother. If I am looked in a bad light because I don't think Katherine should be talked down about than that's fine and someones choice. And does not make me or other fans support the "family" more than MJ. Infact in (my opinion) it shows TRUE support for Michael to not turn against his mother when he respected her so much. Do I like everything she does? No! But I don't like everything my mother does either.. It does not make her any less of a mother! Side note: If Michael himself would not talk badly about Joseph after all the bad he's done to Michael, why should I say anything bad about Katherine because I don't like how she promotes, the times of it, and other things along those lines? I shouldn't.. She loveS him with all her heart and I would never doubt that, and that's more so than I can say of ANY of the people that surrounded him on a regular bases. GOD BLESS KATHERINE JACKSON!
I don't know, I keep reading different things.I thunk it was said that mj bought her out years back
excellent post and trueTotally AGREE. I think saying "fans are hating on Katherine" is far too simple, and without all the context. I don't know of ANYONE who started out, right after Michael's death, with anything but the utmost respect, support, and even LOVE, for Katherine. The thing is, I think MOST fans love Michael's children even MORE. They were his LIFE, and we all know that! We also know, very well, how he was trying to raise them -- OUT of the public eye. That was incredibly important to him, as a father, that they have normal lives, as possible, being the children of the world's most famous person!
Personally, I don't hate Katherine, and I call her no names. I do GREATLY dislike the things she has done, to-date, though. I dislike those things because I'm a parent myself, and because it was no secret how Michael wanted to have his children raised! This isn't just a "difference in parenting," but it's USING them, to gain money for others. IMHO.
There was no particular criticism from fans when Katherine sent the kids to public school. That was her choice, and was not unreasonable. But then, and increasingly, there has been cause for alarm. One thing Michael would NEVER have done, would be to use his own children to promote his projects and products! That would have been unthinkable! And for many of us, it's also unthinkable that the family is actually doing that! My heart was broken when I saw Paris holding up a bottle of Joe's "perfume." Horrible. I have NO doubt what Michael would say about that.
I've read the Howard Mann contract. That ripped it, in my book. Have you all READ that? The contract actually uses the word "EXPLOIT!" Katherine would be paid for trotting out the children, for public appearances, interviews, etc. (no mention of the children being paid anything, though). Those kids were required to go on Oprah! One of the major Michael haters during the trial, and after. If Michael were sitting right beside me, I wouldn't have to GUESS what his reaction would be! And I would say exactly the same things I'm saying here!
I do think it's NEVER good to call names, and I never do. But, it's entirely appropriate to love those children, and to be concerned for their well-being, and critical of those who would treat them badly. And now? I see a tabloid report that they may be on a reality show!??? I hope to God it's not true, and if it IS true, I hope that Michael summons the power to create a "demonstration" bolt-of-lightning, just in case anyone is confused about what HE would have wanted for his children!
exactly.There is no way Michael would like how his children been used to promote things. I think the way Paris spoke at the memorial and when they accepted the grammy for Michael I think Michael would have been proud of them. It's these other things like being in contract with Mann, perfume bottles, belts etc. They have to appear at the concert. Them on twitter. He kept them away from his business. Even people in the media who don't like Michael have said he wouldn't like certain things either. When his children are adults then it's a different story but for now they should have privacy and kept out of deals.
I just realised that Jermaine has a particular thought pattern. When he is unable to reach someone or change their mind about something, it is because they are being influenced by those around them. And he goes public! He is now doing with his mother what he did with Michael.
Those ppl. Is that the same ppl who according to taj are running the fanboards.
Those ppl. Is that the same ppl who according to taj are running the fanboards.
Yeah i was refering to your post but i was being sarcastic interms of everyone blaming the "others"