I remember hearing that Joe has become nicer and “softer” in the last few years, and I think even Michael mentioned that in some of his interviews. During the courtcase Joe stood strongly by Michael’s side and their relationship seemed better than before. While Joe certainly seems to have difficulty expressing his emotions, I do believe that Michael’s death has caused him a lot of pain. However, having said all this, I still hate it how people try to justify corporal punishment when asking for respect for Joe.
I myself work as a psychologist with children, and have therefore studied this topic quite a lot. It is such a common misunderstanding that some children “need” spanking because of them being “bad kids” or whatever. Yes, children can act cruelly and have enormous behavior problems, but spanking is NEVER a good way to solve these problems. Actually, if a child teases other children or has problems controlling his or her anger, a parent behaving the same way towards the child will only make things worse. Using a corporal punishment can certainly make children obey their parents out of fear of punishment. However, it doesn’t help them to understand why it was wrong what they did, and therefore they are likely to continue that kind of behavior outside the presence of their parents instead of developing an inner sense of morals and ethical values. This is why a corporal punishment is not a good way to stop your child from ending up in crimes. Actually, crime rates are much higher for adults who were beaten as kids than for those, who weren’t. Even mild forms of corporal punishment have been shown to be harmful. For example, children who are spanked, tend to interpret other children’s neutral gestures as aggressive more often than children who haven’t been spanked. And this, of course, can lead them to behave aggressively towards their peers.
No child is born bad or evil, although using a corporal punishment can make children feel they are that. Then, as adults they often talk defensively about their childhood: “I had a normal/happy childhood. Yes, I got spankings, but I always deserved it. I turned up okay”. And unfortunately, this kind of defensive attitude is usually a sign of them continuing their parents’ way of behavior towards their own families (spouses and/or children), and actually this seems to be the case with some of the Jackson brothers. So, it would be wrong to say that Michael is somehow extra sensitive or the only one affected by Joe’s behavior. Actually, he seems to be one of the few family members who have acknowledged that what Joe did was wrong, and therefore he was able to stop the cycle with his own children.
When it comes to Michael’s children, none of us as outsiders can be sure what the situation is with Joe nowadays. I know that I certainly don’t want him to RAISE them, but I would perhaps consider it a bit extreme to say that there shouldn’t be any contact at all with him, unless we find out that this is what Michael wanted before his death. After all, it is possible that Joe is different with his grandkids than he was with his own kids. Apparently even Katherine has defended spanking in her book, but I hope they both now see by watching Michael’s kids that spanking is absolutely not needed and will respect Michael’s wishes by solving problems in other ways. It makes me happy to know that while Michael left us too soon, he DID spend many good years as a loving dad to all his children. These years with Michael have taught his kids that they are unconditionally loved and that no one has a right to hurt them. So even, if they were to have spankings at some point in the future, they will instinctively know that it is not right and depending on the situation, maybe even defend themselves. They will not have to feel themselves bad or unworthy like many other kids, who have been born in an abusive environment and are not able to question things because of not knowing of anything better.