Re: New--- Lisa Marie Presley on Michael Jackson
The only reason she gets attention is because Elvis Presley was her father. Anytime she does something he gets talked about and then she was married to Michael and they bring him up too. Whatever she does the people interviewing her will ask her something about them. They just have to do it.
I just ignore her because her opinions about Michael don't matter to me anymore. They divorced in 1996 and Michael died 2009. Even if they spent time together after the divorce she wasn't a part of his life for a really long time. He moved on with his kids. I will never forget what she did in the past. That's why I don't trust or believe what she really says now. She is just like anyone else who knew Michael who say they opposite of him then what they said before he died. I don't give them the time a day and we shouldn't give her the time of day.
I hope I don't offend anyone with what I have said. She is negative energy to us and we don't need that. If she were to ever say something direspectful towards Michael then like with anyone who does that we should say something. When you hear or see something you don't like on tv we change the channel. With her just change the channel so to speak. She is not worth it.
exactly. it's like a person is in a relationship and they are betrayed by that person. sure, you'd like to get them out of your mind if they betray you, but other people complain about how you just keep talking about the betrayal. when someone breaks trust, you never forget that. you can forgive, but you don't want to get hurt again. and the sad reality in life is, people make promises to never betray again, but as you well know, if you've been betrayed by someone, it alters your relationship, permanently. No exceptions, unless you think you're better than the rest of us. We can move on, but nothing is quite the same, especially since people have a tendency to repeat betrayals. And it's easy to say what could have been, after somebody dies..because death makes it easy to say things would be different. But as harsh as this may sound..death makes it easy to make another promise and convince people you'll keep it, because they're not around anymore for you to betray. As humbling as it may sound, that's why death changes things. But nobody should make the mistake of thinking that just because it's not forgotten that it's not forgiven. However, if somebody is going to bring up someone they betrayed, just in time for an album promotion, that does nothing to convince sound thinking that that person has really changed from being someone who betrays. It would be a little easier to consider the change, if there was no promotion for an album involved. Please, don't tell me, that if anyone in here is betrayed, and the person doing the betraying decides to seem to make a change, just in time for something that benefits
the person doing the betraying that the person that was betrayed can consider that 'change' to be sincere. Maybe the person doing the betraying can't help it, but the pain is still the same. Hopefully, the fact that there is reaction to the betrayal can be a teaching tool for the one doing the betraying, but more often than not, the lessons are never truly learned. We all move on, we do forgive, but we are all altered. These things should not be confused, as, so often, people confuse them, mightily, when it comes to assessment of MJ fans. And that talking in two directions makes it hard to convince us that the person talking in two directions, is talking in one direction. it's hard to convince us we're preaching to the choir when a choir member keeps accusing us of hate. That accusation is unwarranted. Deep anger is based on passion. A person doesn't have a basis for knowing that it is hate. They're just guessing. I don't hate Lisa Marie. I don't have time for that. But Michael interests me, and I talk about him and things associated with him.
And Michael made a big positive impact on us..so..we care more about him, so this betrayal thing affects us deeply.
