It's time to take the gloves off when discussing Latoya and her past, she's never been an innocent character no matter what's being claimed by some, including herself, she's always been more of a wolf in sheep's clothing filled with jealousy and resentment. I stany by my words, and won't take them back.
This is what she was, this is what she'll always be.
Before this book was published I would have disagreed with you... now....
I think she was brainwashed and is incredibly impressionable and easy to manipulate but she wasn't an idiot. She knew when things would benefit her. She understood how successful being the "rebel" in the family was making her.
In her interview recently when asked about whether or not she was really sexually abuse by Joe... she didn't give a straightforward answer. Does she even mention this in her book?
The reason I actually read and believed her first book was because it seemed like she had a level of self awareness and that she was being honest. There was also an agenda there, especially at the end with Jack Gordon, but until that point it seemed truthful. This time it's just 100% agenda and white washing her own story, like she has no interest in trying to understand herself, her brother, her family, her marriage. I sometimes wonder if people like her had to actually sit and take stock of everything that happened in their lives if they'd just collapse from the ugly reality of it all, so she just keeps on talking and talking and making lots of noise so none of it has to catch up with her.
I remember the book Marlon was rumoured to have been interested in publishing in 2005 that never materialized. I think out of all the siblings he would be the only one I'd be really interested in hearing from because I don't believe he's caught up in his own agenda. He supposedly was going to talk about how Joe would steal from them in business, etc. I think when Kath/Joe pass a lot of things will come out.
How sad is it that people who have a platform to really share stories and really reinforce a positive image refrain from doing so all the time because of their own agendas? Why not talk about his innocence from the allegations? His vitiligo? His lupus? How talented he was? Insights into his talents?
Instead just this garbage.
Also another odd thing. She mentions the notes Michael wrote hating Branca. She briefly mentions having an affidavit from a secretary in Branca's firm about his double&triple billing. You have the fact that judge gave Katherine the option to challenge executors. I have to ask why didn't she then? Why wouldn't she march into that court with Branca's firing letter, affidavits against him and Michael's handwritten note that said "I hate Branca"? why not? See these kind of things makes their claims hard to believe.
There are people who justify it by saying Katherine didn't want to be cut off from the will. But in all their hearings against the estate, Joe's, Randy's, nobody has ever mentioned any of this. Seems like it would be the first thing I would mention and keep mentioning if I believed it.
Reminds me of Paris saying Hollywood Tonight isn't really him, sigh. They're already brainwashed. I just hope it isn't too late for them.