so...the media has the whole world believing it's a drug thing. when every headline ends with a questionmark, the media has managed to make it the answer. along with the government. the authorities still haven't got past saying they BELIEVE it's a drug thing.(and it's too late for them to change, now, because it's clearly seen). all the wording in all the articles screams questionmark, questionmark, questionmark. there have been not one, but TWO raids. the definition of a raid, these days, is when authorities have nothing, but want you to not think that(see Neverland). yet, they can't find anything on raid number 1, so they have raid number 2. that screams questionmark, even more.
and now...here's the kicker.
the initial autopsy report said 'there was NO trauma to the body.'
yet, now the press and the government are saying there will be results of a TOXICOLOGY REPORT. how can there be a tox report, without trauma to the body??
does not trauma include at least one needle mark? shouldn't the autopsy report have been worded differently? of all reports the people writing this are at task to be the most responsible people in the world. shouldn't the autopsy report not have any words relating to 'no trauma', if there is a needlemark? apparently there is no needlemark, according to the way the original announced report was written.
either this is the most irresponsible report ever written, or, everything following it is folly and lies, designed to paint MJ as a druggie. not to mention, the tox report is taking an extraordinary amount of a long time to be revealed.
the only way i figure a drug can be administered without a needlemark is in the mouth while sleeping, in this case.
and yes..that sounds rediculous. that's my point.
you see, this is a government that executes people by lethal injection, if they administer the death penalty. i would think they would know that a needlemark is the definition of trauma.