kindofdisco
Proud Member
Disagree. The family is NOT the problem. And this is why you had Taj fighting you guys on twitter. *shakes head*
Latest on MJJC
- Latest Michael Jackson News
- Click Here to Join Our Community
- Follow us on X
- Wanna talk Michael? Come join the chat rooms
- The Michael Jackson Chart Watch
- Become an MJJC Patron
- Join the Premium Member Group and Get Lot's of Extra's
- Major Love Prayer - Worldwide Monthly Prayer Every 25th
- MJJC Exclusive Q&A - We talk to the family and those in and around Michael
- Join us in the Chat Rooms
- Find us on Facebook
Jermaine Writing Book On Life With MJ *Book To Be Released Sept 13*
Taj is fighting on Twitter cuz he knows he's gonna end up like Michael's siblings and join the long list of long forgotten and irrelevant Jackson's. He needs to get a paying a job instead of wasting time on online fights at the age of 38. SMDH And YES the family IS the problem, they've ALWAYS been the problem, if their approach had been different there would've never been the NEED for Michael to go and search for substitute families across the globe.
I am just guessing but the what is the truth? It is easy to think Michael kept his distance from them and it's easy for some to think people kept Michael away from his family. The one thing I do know is that his family hardly saw or talked to him for years at a time. It wasn't the same. The only one who really talked to him the most was his mother. The only person that could tell us what was really going on is Michael and he can't do that.
michael keeping his family at a distance didn't suddenly happen in his final years, that is how it was almost all of Michael's adult life, there is nothing to guess about for years Michael was able to keep in touch with his mother yet he somehow wasn't able to ring up those siblings of his!? My ass. Michael did whatever Michael wanted to do, that's a known fact. Even back when Prince was born Janet hadn't seen Prince until the boy was nearly 2 years old and she randomly met Michael at some hotel with his two children according to herself in some interview back in 2001, 1999 and 1997. In 1997/8 she stated while making the rounds for her VR album that she hadn't seen nor spoken (!!) with Michael since the making of Scream, she said it was normal and there was no falling out between them. Back then even Jermaine mentioned first meeting Prince when he was nearly 9 or 10 months old. in 2008 when Janet was on Tyra, Oprah and other shows to promote some album she stated the same thing she said in 1997 that she hadn't spoken nor seen Michael since the trial in 2005, but she knew what was going on cuz he was keeping in touch with 'mother', In May 09 when that anniverssary thing happened most of the Jackson's hadn't seen him since 2005, not because Michael wasn't allowed to see them but because Michael didn't want to. When Joseph showed up at Michael's house in April of 2009 with his ex con friend Leonard Rowe, Michael kept them waiting for hours until he allowed them in, (Joseph was there to talk about the AGE concert tour, disturbing Paris' birthday party), when Mike lived in LV in 2007/8 Randy showed up as well as Joseph several times, and Michael didn't let either of them, guess why? Because he didn't want to see them. Of course criminal Randy threatened to ram his car into Michael's gates and call press. When Michael was in the UK in 2007 and JErmaine was there at the same time several fans witnessed JErmaine running around asking friends in which hotel Michael was staying, cuz he had no idea, yet when Mike came to attend the World Music Awards in 2007 he had no problem bringing Katherine along, who also spent time with him and his kids when Michael was in Japan back in 07. Michael flew her to Bahrain as well. So please give me a reasonable explanation why Michael had no problems NONE WHATSOEVER to take his mother along, call her up, let her visit him, wherever he was, yet was somehow unable to do the same when it came to his siblings? It makes no sense whatsoever. You may not like his decisions but those were his decisions, and he had valid reasons for staying away. IF the family had been less demanding/expecting and more understanding toward him, his pain, and whatever he went through he would've acted differently. Michael's decisions and actions mirror his will and trust documents, people may spin it which ever way they want to, facts still don't change.
Ramona122003
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,447
- Points
- 0
Give the time I wrote my first review there were somethings I forgot to add.
One of the things I found kind of odd is the fact that Jermaine never mentions going to any of Michael's solo tours. For example, the Bad Tour is not even really mentioned, but he goes into some detail about his own Precious Moment Tour. Namely, he talked about how touched he was that Michael came to his tour, in custom, and was there cheering him own. However, Jermaine doesn't do the same. In fact, the only time Jermaine really saw him during a tour is when he flew to see Michael after he was exhausted and was about to go into rehab. The way he also justify the Jackson Family Honers is a little strange. This come across even stranger when you consider how Jermaine was saying how Michael was going to invite them to perform when Jermaine never bothered before coming to one of Michael's tours.
Going back to the Jackson Family Honors for a moment, Jermaine more or less said in his write up that they did it despite Michael having problems with drugs or exhausting from the allegations was because of a belief that the show must go on. Given what he said later about AEG, this comes across as hypocritical for many reasons that are too long to name here. In fact, he didn't mention how the family hounded Michael to do the Jackson Family Honors and how it ended in a lawsuit. Speaking of lawsuits, he also didn't mention the entire fiasco with the Koreans and how they try to pressure Michael into it after he was still recovering from the Bad Tour. The book literally skips from the Victory Tour and goes straight to Word2theBadd fiasco in less than a chapter.
On a personal note, the way that Jermaine went out of his way several times without prompt about why he wasn't jealous of Michael only served to make him look even more jealous. He kept going on about how proud he was of his brother and how his success was the family's success, ect. Given how Jermaine has been acting in recent years and the account of others, this strikes me as a load. He also act like Michael had no contact with his family what so ever, which we all know he talked to his mother and Janet through the 90s, and kept contact with his mother throughout his life. So, it isn't like they had no idea what was going on as Jermaine kind of suggest.
In all honestly, if you were going to read any Jacksons' book, I would suggest you read Toya's first book and Mrs. Jackson's book. This one leave too many empty spaces and it's clear that Jermaine is counting on people not knowing his family's history to fill in the gasps and he isn't being truthful in allot of cases.
One of the things I found kind of odd is the fact that Jermaine never mentions going to any of Michael's solo tours. For example, the Bad Tour is not even really mentioned, but he goes into some detail about his own Precious Moment Tour. Namely, he talked about how touched he was that Michael came to his tour, in custom, and was there cheering him own. However, Jermaine doesn't do the same. In fact, the only time Jermaine really saw him during a tour is when he flew to see Michael after he was exhausted and was about to go into rehab. The way he also justify the Jackson Family Honers is a little strange. This come across even stranger when you consider how Jermaine was saying how Michael was going to invite them to perform when Jermaine never bothered before coming to one of Michael's tours.
Going back to the Jackson Family Honors for a moment, Jermaine more or less said in his write up that they did it despite Michael having problems with drugs or exhausting from the allegations was because of a belief that the show must go on. Given what he said later about AEG, this comes across as hypocritical for many reasons that are too long to name here. In fact, he didn't mention how the family hounded Michael to do the Jackson Family Honors and how it ended in a lawsuit. Speaking of lawsuits, he also didn't mention the entire fiasco with the Koreans and how they try to pressure Michael into it after he was still recovering from the Bad Tour. The book literally skips from the Victory Tour and goes straight to Word2theBadd fiasco in less than a chapter.
On a personal note, the way that Jermaine went out of his way several times without prompt about why he wasn't jealous of Michael only served to make him look even more jealous. He kept going on about how proud he was of his brother and how his success was the family's success, ect. Given how Jermaine has been acting in recent years and the account of others, this strikes me as a load. He also act like Michael had no contact with his family what so ever, which we all know he talked to his mother and Janet through the 90s, and kept contact with his mother throughout his life. So, it isn't like they had no idea what was going on as Jermaine kind of suggest.
In all honestly, if you were going to read any Jacksons' book, I would suggest you read Toya's first book and Mrs. Jackson's book. This one leave too many empty spaces and it's clear that Jermaine is counting on people not knowing his family's history to fill in the gasps and he isn't being truthful in allot of cases.
MsCassieMollie
Proud Member
Through A Brother's Eyes: Jermaine Jackson Speaks - Part One (New Interview by Charles Thomson )
(NOTE): This interview was conducted before the trial began.
Charles Thomson: Through A Brother's Eyes: Jermaine Jackson Speaks - Part One
(NOTE): This interview was conducted before the trial began.
Charles Thomson: Through A Brother's Eyes: Jermaine Jackson Speaks - Part One
It's mid-September and Jermaine Jackson is winding up a grueling U.K. book tour, which has seen him spend the last four days making back-to-back television and radio appearances. Securing an interview slot has taken three days of negotiation between Jermaine, his publicist and publishing reps on both sides of the Atlantic. When his car picks me up in Wood Lane, London and drives us into the BBC Studios, he has just appeared on Loose Women -- Britain's answer to The View -- and is on his way to be interviewed by BBC Radio Five's Richard Bacon.
As we're led inside, several dozen students on a BBC walkabout lose all interest in their tour guide as they spot Michael Jackson's brother passing through the building. I feel self-conscious as their stares follow us through the foyer but Jermaine appears not to notice. It comes with the territory. As one of the figureheads of America's most famous family, he's become accustomed to outsiders constantly looking in. The problem, though, is that what they see is often warped; a fragmented simulacrum presented by the media. This, he says, is why he has written his new book, You Are Not Alone: Michael Through A Brother's Eyes.
"How was Loose Women?" I ask him, as we wait for an elevator.
"Well..." He half-grins and exhales loudly. "They were loose."
The Loose Women interview, like many Jermaine has conducted in recent weeks, was somewhat combative. As Jermaine attempted to speak about his brother from a firsthand perspective he was repeatedly interrupted by the hosts. 'But Jermaine, I think it's fair to say he was quite a complex character...' 'But... there must have been something going on with Michael. He must have been a sick person.'
The assumption by many that they know more about Michael Jackson than his own family is a bug-bear of Jermaine's. This attitude, he says, is the result of a decades-long battle against inaccurate media coverage. "This would become a recurring theme for the family," he writes in the book, "a showdown of fact versus perception -- and fact would always be the underdog."
According to Jermaine, even his initial attempt to write a book, all the way back in 2003, fell flat because publishers were unwilling to print a factual account of his brother's life.
"I had tried to write something with Judith Regan with Harper Collins in New York and they weren't interested in the truth then," he tells me as we sit down in an empty radio studio. "They were interested in the gossip and all the things that were not true. They wanted dirt and I said, 'I have no dirt', so they turned me down."
Eight years later, Harper Collins has come around to Jermaine's way of thinking. His book is described by the publisher as "an intimate, loving portrait of Michael Jackson." But Jermaine hasn't forgotten the 2003 debacle entirely. "They tried to put me on the Judith Regan show on this book tour," he says. "I said, 'No way.'"
In 2006 a document purporting to be Jermaine's 2003 book proposal was leaked to the media and caused a furor. In it Jermaine allegedly branded his brother a 'stubborn', 'harsh', 'cold', 'calculating' and 'devious' drug addict who "purchased children like a sanctioned black market," and "changed his skin color."
For this, Jermaine blames his co-writer Stacy Brown, who he says changed the rejected manuscript to make it more saleable and then circulated it -- all without Jermaine's permission.
"That wasn't my manuscript," says Jermaine. "It was just horrible. My manuscript was registered with lawyers and we had proof. I said, 'My manuscript is totally different from what this guy's saying'.
"Because of that, publishers for this book, for verification purposes, wanted to see that proposal beforehand. I showed them my original proposal about what I wanted to do and it's completely in line with the proposal for this book. So that was completely hijacked by somebody else."
Jermaine isn't the only person to accuse Stacy Brown of such behavior. In 2005 Brown co-wrote a book with disgruntled Jackson employee Bob Jones. When Jones was asked about the book under oath in Michael Jackson's 2005 trial, he admitted that it was only "factual to a degree." Of Brown's work he said, "My co-writer also has included things that I didn't approve of," and added, "I've changed millions of things that were inaccurate that I didn't say."
Photographer: Harrison Funk - Picture used with written permission from Harper Collins
Even the new book has been mired in controversy. As Jermaine flew to London to begin promotion, a storm was brewing over a story he tells in his prologue. Speaking about his brother's 2005 child molestation trial, Jermaine recalls how he was so paranoid that Michael could fall victim to a terrible injustice that he hatched a secret escape plan in case it looked like a guilty verdict could be on the cards. He arranged for a private jet to be on standby at the nearest airport, ready to whisk his brother to Bahrain, where he couldn't be extradited.
However, many journalists -- apparently too lazy even to read Jermaine's eight-and-a-half page prologue in full -- got it monumentally wrong. Stories wrongly stated that the Jackson family had planned to spirit Jackson away to the Middle East after he was convicted; a clearly nonsensical claim.
Nevertheless, copy and paste journalism took hold and the story was replicated hundreds of times by newspapers including the New York Post, NY Daily News, Denver Post and Washington Times. Among the more brainless headlines was this honker, which comes courtesy of Britain's Daily Mail: 'How Michael Jackson's family planned to fly singer out of U.S. to Bahrain if he was jailed for child molestation'. Even the Press Association ran with the inaccurate version.
The nonsensical story made Jermaine's book look like a work of fiction, a situation worsened when the subsequent controversy prompted Michael's 2005 defense attorney Thomas Mesereau to speak out against the misquoted claims.
"One of the reasons I wrote the book was so that my words would stand for themselves, in context," says Jermaine. "But even in the newspapers' coverage of my book, my words were misreported. There was never a plan to get Michael out of the country 'if convicted'. Thomas Mesereau had to issue a denial based on something that wasn't true in the first place. That one change of context showed how one inaccuracy can snowball and how myths are made. I sat back and thought 'This is what Michael faced all the time'."
To be continued...
Last edited:
Ashtanga
Proud Member
Re: Through A Brother's Eyes: Jermaine Jackson Speaks - Part One (New Interview)
Another interview?????????? :wtf: :doh:
Another interview?????????? :wtf: :doh:
Naturelle
Proud Member
Re: Through A Brother's Eyes: Jermaine Jackson Speaks - Part One (New Interview)
Has anyone read Jermines book?
Has anyone read Jermines book?
kindofdisco
Proud Member
Re: Through A Brother's Eyes: Jermaine Jackson Speaks - Part One (New Interview)
This was done BEFORE the trial. The thread clearly states that LOL.
This was done BEFORE the trial. The thread clearly states that LOL.
kindofdisco
Proud Member
Twink, just step back for a moment, step back from this constant negativity that you spew out....and think, just maybe MAYBE you are wrong.
Maybe we DON'T know everything.
Maybe we are ONLY judging - in fact I feel that we all are - from what we've been given via the media and interviews.
Maybe - and this is a bit of a wild thought - the Jacksons are REAL people with REAL thoughts and feelings. Just like Michael.
Are you still with me, here? Or have I lost you?
elapentela
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 188
- Points
- 0
I'm not the person you are talking to but I would like to suggest some research on the subject of the REAL people with REAL thoughts and feeling. If you will go through MJ's Moonwalk and the all audios of his interviews where he talks about his family you will find out that Michael had very little in common as an adult with his family. They did not inspire him professionally and emotionally at all for at least 20 years. He didn't like their laziness and unfortunatelly they had very different views and objectives in life. But the most tragic for Michael Jackson being born in this family is they lack of capacity to understand his sensitivity. They are not able to understand the difference between them and Michael. They are not able to understand Michael's suffering and still will defence Joseph's parental methods. They can't get it how person had to feel when addmiting being ill when seeing his father, even as an adult.
Michael did say to many people that his biological family is not open minded as he was and he complained for getting bored very fast being around them as adults. Mostly because they always wanted Jakson5 reunion but were not able to agree to work hard enough for it. He always wanted some family time and they wanted something else from him.
So don't you think that's enough to avoid them and spend time with people who you enjoy to be around with?
kindofdisco
Proud Member
Oh please, seriously LOL.
Normally I would bother replying to well-written things like this, but the subject matter is just entirely laugh-worthy. Honestly. I bet you haven't even read Jermaine's book, and if you have you obviously didn't read it thoroughly. Jermaine is a proud guy, I've mentioned before that sometimes he can come off as a total douchebag. For someone like that, it's incredibly hard to say up front that they screwed up, or that things weren't so peachy keen. Fans need to read between the lines of his book to realise that he's actually fessing up to a LOT of stuff. I used to be just like you guys, on the other side of the fence. I was pretty vocal about it too. But Jermaine's book honestly turned me around.
The fact is though, people are so caught up in being a fan of Michael and holding him on this pedestal that they can't see when his family are actually trying to say something important. I don't doubt that there was a lot of hurt towards Michael, but damn, they're not cold hearted people. At ALL. They just were on a different level to him, and they react emotionally very differently from Michael. He wore his heart on his sleeve and made no qualms telling people how he felt. Someone like Jermaine is a lot more guarded. Does that make him a bad person? Not at all. Just two different ways of dealing with things emotionally.
Give me exact quotes from Michael's mouth where he's said that his family wasn't open minded. Give me EXACT quotes. Because as a fan for almost four years now, I don't believe I've ever heard that.
Don't forget, it was Michael that said that he felt like Janet was his twin. And help me out here, isn't Janet part of his family? The one you just said he got "bored" with? Righteo. Michael also speaks of his family very highly in Moonwalk. But then again, fans like to disregard that because it doesn't support their opinion.
Nope, sorry I did NOT get that impression from Moonwalk at all. Could've been reading an entirely different book by what you've said here. Also I didn't realise you were Michael Jackson in the flesh. Hey Michael, can you tell me in depth where you ever said your family was lazy? Please, this is fascinating to me! Or then again, perhaps you fancy yourself having the authority to question someone's mental capacity? Gee. That's a new one!
Girl, please. Stop putting words in Michael's mouth. He wasn't a special snowflake that needed defending. Stop painting him as one.
Normally I would bother replying to well-written things like this, but the subject matter is just entirely laugh-worthy. Honestly. I bet you haven't even read Jermaine's book, and if you have you obviously didn't read it thoroughly. Jermaine is a proud guy, I've mentioned before that sometimes he can come off as a total douchebag. For someone like that, it's incredibly hard to say up front that they screwed up, or that things weren't so peachy keen. Fans need to read between the lines of his book to realise that he's actually fessing up to a LOT of stuff. I used to be just like you guys, on the other side of the fence. I was pretty vocal about it too. But Jermaine's book honestly turned me around.
The fact is though, people are so caught up in being a fan of Michael and holding him on this pedestal that they can't see when his family are actually trying to say something important. I don't doubt that there was a lot of hurt towards Michael, but damn, they're not cold hearted people. At ALL. They just were on a different level to him, and they react emotionally very differently from Michael. He wore his heart on his sleeve and made no qualms telling people how he felt. Someone like Jermaine is a lot more guarded. Does that make him a bad person? Not at all. Just two different ways of dealing with things emotionally.
Give me exact quotes from Michael's mouth where he's said that his family wasn't open minded. Give me EXACT quotes. Because as a fan for almost four years now, I don't believe I've ever heard that.
Don't forget, it was Michael that said that he felt like Janet was his twin. And help me out here, isn't Janet part of his family? The one you just said he got "bored" with? Righteo. Michael also speaks of his family very highly in Moonwalk. But then again, fans like to disregard that because it doesn't support their opinion.
Nope, sorry I did NOT get that impression from Moonwalk at all. Could've been reading an entirely different book by what you've said here. Also I didn't realise you were Michael Jackson in the flesh. Hey Michael, can you tell me in depth where you ever said your family was lazy? Please, this is fascinating to me! Or then again, perhaps you fancy yourself having the authority to question someone's mental capacity? Gee. That's a new one!
Girl, please. Stop putting words in Michael's mouth. He wasn't a special snowflake that needed defending. Stop painting him as one.
Last edited:
claudiadoina
Proud Member
this.
No, sorry I forgot to edit my post to add that it wasn't a personal reply to yours I was just talking in general
love is magical
Proud Member
am i the only one who see a big banner advertising jermaine's book on top of the page?
claudiadoina
Proud Member
No, I see that form Bucharest too :cheeky:
love is magical
Proud Member
Interesting! I know sometimes the on-line marketers track people's on-line activities. For instance, I browsed a Sephora website while checking MJJC at home and I saw an ad for makeups on top of MJJC page. Today, I saw an ad for Jermaine's book. But, I haven't browsed any webpage related to MJ or Jermaine here at work, except MJJC. Hmmm... interesting you see the ad in Bucharest too. Lol...
Sunflowers
Proud Member
I have that add too with a link to Amazon. Useless though, cos I bought the book at Amazon....
Sunflowers
Proud Member
I think the whole Bad period isn't mentioned because he didn't see Michael a lot (if at all) during that period. Instead of just explaining that it looks as if he just ignores that whole period. Which does give some gossip again.....
Ramona122003
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,447
- Points
- 0
What I meant was that he could has seen Michael in concert or backstage like he did with Jermaine, but he never did. Which is why I said it was strange that he didn't seem to go to any of Michael's tours, awards shows, ect. He complained about Michael never calling or getting back to him, but he never went to any of his brother endeavors. It just seems kind of one-sided to me, that's all.
MsCassieMollie
Proud Member
SteveDennis71 Steve Dennis
@StacyBrownMedia your version of events is absurd @anne_guentert @CEThomson #forclarity
19 hours ago
in reply to ↑
@StacyBrownMedia
Stacy Brown
@SteveDennis71 @anne_guentert @CEThomson Mr Steve Dennis your opinion is so noted. Be well.
19 hours ago via web
@StacyBrownMedia @SteveDennis71 @anne_guentert @CEThomson As I said, this was first "exposed" in 01. Jermaine and I remained close til '05
19 hours ago via web
......
@resaformj @CEThomson yes much of our book conv was taped as most authors do. No one ever asked what transpired. Remem '01 still friends 05
2 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®
......
CEThomson Charles Thomson
@StacyBrownMedia Jermaine's accusations have been in the public domain for a long time - this isn't a new claim.
19 Oct
resaformj Resa
@CEThomson @StacyBrownMedia -Brown told Donny Deutsch that he had Jermaine on tape making claims but now Brown blames Jermaine girlfriend.
8 hours ago
in reply to ↑
@StacyBrownMedia
Stacy Brown
@resaformj if u want truth feel free 2 ask jerm and me. Don't b like those u say who get 1 side. I've spoken to many fans civilly about this
2 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia @CEThomson as the question was originally mine, I repeat either you or Jermaine must be lying about "Legacy" manuscript!
21 Oct
StacyBrownMedia Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert @CEThomson If you and others listen closely, we r telling same story. Only Jermaine feels the need to cover certain things
21 Oct
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia @CEThomson Do u think it was Alejandra who threw Jermaine under the bus?
21 Oct
StacyBrownMedia Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert @CEThomson we remained close until I decided to write Bob's book in 2005 and I mentioned that MJ "could" be guilty
21 Oct
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia @CEThomson Sounds logical. Jermaine's ex remains the only one not to have written a book about the Jacksons...
21 Oct
StacyBrownMedia Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert I think estate has signed agreement w/her she can't. Jermaine really screwed her over I hope she is doing ok
21 Oct
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia I see. Dealing with any Jackson really has its disadvantages as we have daily proof! Thanks a lot for the info.
21 Oct
in reply to ↑
@StacyBrownMedia
Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert look I've made a fortune bc of my relationship w/them. I would trade it all to have never known them so upclose n personal.
21 Oct via Twitter for BlackBerry®
@StacyBrownMedia your version of events is absurd @anne_guentert @CEThomson #forclarity
19 hours ago
in reply to ↑
@StacyBrownMedia
Stacy Brown
@SteveDennis71 @anne_guentert @CEThomson Mr Steve Dennis your opinion is so noted. Be well.
19 hours ago via web
@StacyBrownMedia @SteveDennis71 @anne_guentert @CEThomson As I said, this was first "exposed" in 01. Jermaine and I remained close til '05
19 hours ago via web
......
@resaformj @CEThomson yes much of our book conv was taped as most authors do. No one ever asked what transpired. Remem '01 still friends 05
2 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®
......
CEThomson Charles Thomson
@StacyBrownMedia Jermaine's accusations have been in the public domain for a long time - this isn't a new claim.
19 Oct
resaformj Resa
@CEThomson @StacyBrownMedia -Brown told Donny Deutsch that he had Jermaine on tape making claims but now Brown blames Jermaine girlfriend.
8 hours ago
in reply to ↑
@StacyBrownMedia
Stacy Brown
@resaformj if u want truth feel free 2 ask jerm and me. Don't b like those u say who get 1 side. I've spoken to many fans civilly about this
2 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia @CEThomson as the question was originally mine, I repeat either you or Jermaine must be lying about "Legacy" manuscript!
21 Oct
StacyBrownMedia Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert @CEThomson If you and others listen closely, we r telling same story. Only Jermaine feels the need to cover certain things
21 Oct
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia @CEThomson Do u think it was Alejandra who threw Jermaine under the bus?
21 Oct
StacyBrownMedia Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert @CEThomson we remained close until I decided to write Bob's book in 2005 and I mentioned that MJ "could" be guilty
21 Oct
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia @CEThomson Sounds logical. Jermaine's ex remains the only one not to have written a book about the Jacksons...
21 Oct
StacyBrownMedia Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert I think estate has signed agreement w/her she can't. Jermaine really screwed her over I hope she is doing ok
21 Oct
anne_guentert Anne Güntert
@StacyBrownMedia I see. Dealing with any Jackson really has its disadvantages as we have daily proof! Thanks a lot for the info.
21 Oct
in reply to ↑
@StacyBrownMedia
Stacy Brown
@anne_guentert look I've made a fortune bc of my relationship w/them. I would trade it all to have never known them so upclose n personal.
21 Oct via Twitter for BlackBerry®
bluetopez
Proud Member
That Stacy Brown is such scumbag! Are we suppose to feel sorry for him? LOL What a jerk! If he had beef with any Jackson he should have dealt with them instead of taking it out on MJ, who he only met once or twice and only breifly! Stacy likes the attention and the "fortune" he made on his "friendship" with the Jacksons he was always a foe though never a real friend. The proof is the fact that he went against the family and MJ during the 03 allegation and trial because he just felt like it. He thought the money would be great, even though he had no proof. So he dumped the Jacksons to team up with other Liars like Bob Jones and Diane Dimond. SMH He can drop dead for all I care! What a thorn in the ass this guy is! UGH But, he'll get his soon enough too!
Lynn88
Proud Member
MsCassieMollie;3517250 said:
The fact that Stacy Brown feels sorry for Alejandra after all the crap she's pulled says all you need to know about the man. Unbelievable.
Ashtanga
Proud Member
MsCassieMollie;3517250 said:
Resa
Proud Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2011
- Messages
- 785
- Points
- 28
I have seen pictures of Joe and Jackie backstage with Michael during his solo tours.