Jermaine Writing Book On Life With MJ *Book To Be Released Sept 13*

Wait a second, did Jermaine REALLY claim Michael raised a hand on his children?!!
What a :censored:
He's just jealous that he'll never come close to being the kind of father Michael was to his children. Michael was the kind of father Jermaine will never be.

IF he really claimed Michael raised his hand against his children, he's hit another ultimate LOW POINT.
If he really said this, he won't shy away of saying even worse stuff about Michael in the future in order to promote something new, or defend abusive Joseph.
I hope that he never said those things but if he did it's just a further proof that nothing, NOT A THING about Jermaine is genuine.

Somebody needs to tell him to shut the f*** up!! :mat: Man, I hate Jermaine. It's so easy for him to say these things while Michael is no longer here to defend himself. I don't believe a word he says.
 
I wonder if they will ever admit that maybe they gave Michael reasons to distance himself from them. He certainly was able to get in touch with many and remain close. That says something.

I dont think they will ever admit it
 
Jermaine Jackson on 'Joy Behar Show 9/30

CNN.com - Transcripts

BEHAR: Michael Jackson was known by almost everyone in the world but one person who really knew him the best and the longest was his older brother, Jermaine. In his new book, "You Are Not Alone: Through a brother`s eyes", Jermaine Jackson gives an inside look into Michael`s life, death and all the controversy surrounding him.

So welcome to the show Jermaine.

JERMAINE JACKSON, BROTHER OF MICHAEL JACKSON: Thank you.

BEHAR: We saw each other earlier today. I feel like I know you now.

You know, the Conrad Murray trial is going to start very soon. Do you think we`ll find out what happened to Michael in that trial?

JACKSON: I really don`t know. That`s why it was important to write the book because I wanted to sort of give the facts and explain how things happened.

BEHAR: Well, reportedly, the doctor gave Michael this drug Propofol, which caused his death. So ipso facto, that would make him culpable. Is he?

JACKSON: Is he meaning what?

BEHAR: He gave it to him. So does that make him guilty?

JACKSON: That makes the doctor -- he was the one that administered it to him outside of the hospital setting, which was wrong, because you need the proper people. He took an oath to take care of his client, not to kill him.

BEHAR: Yes.

JACKSON: At the same time, you have to be licensed to inject Propofol into anyone. You have to be an anesthesiologist. He`s a cardiologist, he knew not what he was doing.

BEHAR: Right. Propofol is the drug that they give people who are going under in a hospital setting. And you know, somebody told me in another interview I did that when you take Propofol, you do not even dream, that`s how deep in a sleep you become. Why do you think Michael had to be so deep in a sleep?

JACKSON: Michael had problems sleeping because of coming offstage and all the excitement. And whether or not he asked for it, the fact that it should have been in a proper setting, should have been administered with the proper person. And it wasn`t. He had a job to keep Michael -- keep Michael healthy, keep him alive.

BEHAR: Yes. But he was taking this Propofol quite regularly.

JACKSON: I really don`t know. Even if he was, the --

BEHAR: The doctor should have known better.

JACKSON: Yes. He should have known better because you have to -- you have to have the right medical equipment to administer this stuff. It wasn`t in a hospital setting. We don`t know how much he was giving him. That`s why we`re hoping we get answers from the trial.

BEHAR: Did you know he was doing this Propofol? Did the family know?

JACKSON: We knew he had problems with sleeping. We knew there was a thing that he was taking Demerol for pain. But none of this had --

BEHAR: What was the pain from?

JACKSON: The pain was from the Pepsi burn and the pain was also for when he --

BEHAR: Pepsi burn -- when he did the commercial?

JACKSON: Yes. Also when he performed in Munich and he fell. He fell on his back because the hydraulics gave way. But the symptoms I write about in the book, the symptoms we never heard he`s never experienced before in his entire life of being on stage. That adds up to what were they doing? How much were they giving him? And it was in an improper setting.

BEHAR: But there was no intervention by the family or anybody else. Did they not know about it? Were they afraid to do something?

JACKSON: The family? There was supposed to have been an intervention in 2001, but there wasn`t because there was not one. But when you have these symptoms that we`ve never heard or he has never experienced before, that`s what brings questions to our minds as to what was the doctor doing? What was his intentions? We would never know if he acted alone because a lot of the surveillance tapes were erased from the house.

BEHAR: That`s funny. A lot of people, they think they can tell the doctor. I know somebody years ago, a friend of the family and she -- her appendix was rupturing, she wouldn`t go to the hospital and the doctor said, well, she doesn`t want to go, and she died.

JACKSON: Wow.

BEHAR: You know, I mean a lot of times the patient and the doctor are in some kind of co-dependency. Do you think that might have had something to do with this?

JACKSON: No, no, no, no. The doctor has given an oath, all doctors do. Their oath is to do their job, according to their law, the medical laws. And Dr. Murray`s job was to keep Michael healthy, to keep him alive. And the fact that he went from being healthy beyond mid-June for this tour and then all of a sudden these things happened, the symptoms.

BEHAR: So you blame the doctor?

JACKSON: I blame the doctor because of his negligence. I blame the doctor because of just irresponsible -- the sad whole situation.

BEHAR: You also write in the book that there was a conspiracy to -- that Michael thought there was a conspiracy to finish him off, to kill him, basically. He wore bullet proof vests. Do you believe that?

JACKSON: Yes, he wore a bullet proof vest here in New York. He was always threatened. We were threatened quite a bit on the "Victory Tour" when we were going to the concerts.

BEHAR: Who threatened him?

JACKSON: There were people -- there were just series of random threats from sick people.

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: Well, that happens to a lot of celebrities, I think. It`s not really serious, people say things.

JACKSON: Yes. But you take all threats seriously because you never know. See Michael was such a great star, there was like so much coming at him, and he didn`t trust. Later, he did not trust.

BEHAR: Yes. Who do you think wanted to kill him specifically? I mean do you believe that this Propofol death was deliberate or premeditated in some way or an accident?

JACKSON: If you`re a doctor, I can`t say whether it was an accident because he should have known, whether he should have been putting this in him or not even if Michael asked for it.

BEHAR: I know that part. But I`m saying -- you don`t think it`s deliberate, do you?

JACKSON: What I put in the book, read the book. And what I did is even before the Propofol, I gave you all the events and all the things that took place even from when he put out "Thriller" and was a major success and all of a sudden he`d become all these crazy names and all this stuff, all the way to the point of his death.

I want them to read it to examine for themselves what happened to Michael Jackson. And they need to know especially on Chapter 17 all these false allegations from day one. Michael says in there, to walk in my shoes, to walk in his moccasins, then you can judge him as to who he really was.

BEHAR: Yes. Well, we`ll get to all of that. I want to get to everything in this interview. But I`m still working on this part about, you know, what happened to him.

Your sister, Latoya told me on this show, like call warned her, he said, "I`m going to be murdered for my music publishing." She also said this.

Let`s watch the tape of Latoya.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

LATOYA JACKSON, SISTER OF MICHAEL JACKSON: I think it was a conspiracy, because the way my brother laid it out to me, everything happened exactly the way he said it would happen. I think that there are very many people involved. This was premeditated. It was pre-planned. I think Dr. Murray just happened to be the fall guy.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BEHAR: She says it was premeditated. Do you think it was premeditated?

JACKSON: I don`t know.

BEHAR: She seems to.

JACKSON: That`s why the trial is so important because there again, I wanted to not yell this or not yell -- we are family members but still we have our own opinion as to what happened.

BEHAR: Right. So you don`t agree with her?

JACKSON: I`m not saying I don`t agree with her. The bottom line is I do agree to the fact that he is not here and it was by the hands of the doctor as well as whoever else was coming in the house that we will never know because the tapes were erased. I`m saying the doctors should have known better. Should have known better.

BEHAR: Yes. Before his death, Michael was rehearsing for a series of 50 concerts. How was his health during that time?

JACKSON: Michael`s health was incredible. He was in shape.

BEHAR: So he was in good shape to do 50 concerts?

JACKSON: He was in very good shape. It started out with 10. He was in very good health. He was dancing four hours a day with Lovell Smith. He was cut, he was ripped, he excited about just all the creative aspects of the show and what he wanted to do when he got there to make changes. Not only that, he was looking forward to doing that and going beyond that by putting a down payment on a home that he wanted in Vegas and he had plans. He had plans to move on beyond "This Is It".

BEHAR: I wonder if there`s any side effects to Propofol. I mean the next day, you don`t have a hangover; you don`t feel -- I mean --

JACKSON: But see, even if he had had Propofol in the past, it had to be with the right anesthesiologist who was licensed and there were never these type of symptoms that --

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: Well, apparently he did not know better to ask for an anesthesiologist either.

JACKSON: No.

BEHAR: Michael didn`t.

JACKSON: It`s --

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: Yes.

JACKSON: -- to administer Propofol, you have to have one.

BEHAR: Right. Well, we reached out to the AEG people, the promoters but they did not return our calls because we were going to ask them about, you know, maybe pushing him too hard.

JACKSON: Yes.

BEHAR: But you say no.

JACKSON: Well, pushing him, they were pushing him. They were -- I state in the book, there was one time he didn`t show up for one of the rehearsals at a certain time and they -- from our eyes and ears that were at the rehearsals, they tore into him, they went to his house and they read him the riot act. And it was very tough, it was very tough for him.

BEHAR: Ok and we`re going to take a break and we`ll have much more with Jermaine Jackson all the way. So stay right there.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Coming up later, Joy dishes the dirt with celebrity chef, Rachael Ray.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
 
Continued...

Jermaine Jackson on 'Joy Behar Show 9/30

CNN.com - Transcripts

BEHAR: And we`re back talking to Jermaine Jackson about the turbulent life and death of his brother, Michael, which was revealed -- which is revealed in -- in Jermaine`s new book, "You are not Alone." Ok.

There`s a lot of family love in the book, right? You had -- you were a loving family in many ways. What kind of boy was Michael as he -- when he was a child?

JACKSON: Michael was a lot of fun. What I put in the book was pretty much the brotherhood, and the love we had for one another when we were growing up. And so many wonderful moments -- wonderful meaning funny times of us just acting like the three stooges and having fun. Food fights on tour.

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: Food fights.

JACKSON: The Jackson 5 days, of just putting pranks and -- and because at the end of the day, this is to show the human side as well as to address all the things that has -- that has happened. That there`s a beautiful story here because Michael comes from a family we were raised to respect people, to respect one another, to have love for life and love for God`s creations. And he never lost that all through his life.

BEHAR: Yes. Your -- your father, you father Joe, admitted to Oprah that he did whip you kids.

JACKSON: Yes.

BEHAR: And you write that Michael would have to pick the branch that Joe would whip him with and he -- and he beat -- he beat up Marlon and Michael the most. Would you say that`s a sadistic behavior?

JACKSON: No. No. He didn`t beat them -- this is -- this is amazing because --back in the day, we were raised a little different from anyone else. We -- we -- we got spankings for things that we were told not to do. We were kids but it -- it wasn`t beatings, it wasn`t abuse and we were raised like any other kids on the block.

BEHAR: So then -- so then why did you write that Michael would have to pick the branch that Joe would whip him with?

JACKSON: We all had to pick a branch which was just a little thing like this and you would just get --

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: That hurts.

JACKSON: Yes.

BEHAR: That hurts, that leaves marks.

JACKSON: But -- but about -- no, no. There were no whips, there were no marks, nothing. The bottom line, is there was so much going on around us, growing up, in a neighborhood that was just infested with gangs and drugs.

BEHAR: Where was this?

JACKSON: In Gary, Indiana.

BEHAR: Gary, Indiana.

JACKSON: And having to duck because -- and turn the lights out and hit the floor because they are shooting and they are fighting right around you. My father did not want us to get involved with that. At the same time, all our friends are either on drugs or dead or -- or just tragic endings.

So he was very careful not to let us get involved in those types of things that were all around us all the time.

BEHAR: I understand that.

JACKSON: But there was nothing about abuse, Michael being younger, he was frightened because anybody young who`s going to get a spanking, they run --

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: How old was he when he got spanked?

JACKSON: We were -- we were all like -- he was -- I`m four years older, so if I was 10, he was 6, and it`s just that that`s the way the families were raised in the neighborhood.

BEHAR: Yes.

Well, you know, I understand, you know, why your father and your mother would want you to stay out of gangs and all of those of drugs and other bad behaviors but that`s -- I mean -- so -- so you discipline your children so harshly to keep them away --

(CROSSTALK)

JACKSON: No, it wasn`t harshly, it wasn`t harshly.

BEHAR: It wasn`t?

JACKSON: No it was not harshly.

BEHAR: All right. Ok. If you say so, it sounded to me like it because I`m totally against spanking.

JACKSON: But I think I was -- yes. But -- but you got to realize the things they call Columbine, kids come to school and he just shoots up his friends and the whole school.

BEHAR: Right.

JACKSON: That comes from nobody not caring for them, disciplining them at the right time, knowing their whereabouts and what`s going on.

BEHAR: Well, I guess.

(CROSSTALK)

JACKSON: No, really. Really.

BEHAR: But that -- Jermaine, there are other ways to discipline children besides corporal punishment, that`s all I`m saying?

JACKSON: No, no it wasn`t that type of punishment. My father didn`t do anything else. He raised the family during a time there was so much going on to come between family. He brought us from Indiana to California drug-free and without getting involved with gangs and we were all loving each other.

BEHAR: Well, ok maybe it didn`t affect you as much but it might have affected Michael --

(CROSSTALK)

JACKSON: No --

BEHAR: -- because when he asked you if you would cry if your father died and he said that he didn`t think he would. Why not?

JACKSON: Because he was the youngest. He didn`t understand, but he wouldn`t say that today, when they were giving him trouble at the final rehearsals. He -- when he was trying to get people to listen to him at these last days of his rehearsals, he said I bet you if my father come down here you all would listen to me. He loved his father, he respected his father. And he respected his father.

People gave my father a bad rap because he did not kiss butt. When you were wrong, you were wrong. And he did not walk into Hollywood and smile on your face and talk about you behind your back. If he liked you, he liked you, if he didn`t like you, he didn`t like you.

BEHAR: Ok. Back with Jermaine Jackson after a quick break.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BEHAR: We`re back with Jermaine Jackson. You know, Jermaine, there`s all this conversation that we`ve had over the years about Michael sharing his bed with children, ok. What?

JACKSON: Go ahead.

BEHAR: Why did he do that?

JACKSON: Talking about the first case, Michael took care of the family. It was the mother, the kid, the sister, they all have gifts.

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: Maybe that`s why -- that`s maybe why they didn`t complain.

JACKSON: No. But no one ever said that Michael was seducing the mother. The mother was there all the time with the kids.

BEHAR: Well, maybe he wasn`t interested in the mother.

JACKSON: No. You can`t say that. Have you ever called my brother a pedophile before?

BEHAR: No.

JACKSON: You haven`t?

BEHAR: No. I don`t know. I wasn`t there.

JACKSON: Listen, that first case, the system knew, the media knew -- they knew the extortion attempt the father wanted to do.

BEHAR: Why would he do it? It bothers me that he would think it was ok for people to look at that and say, ok, he`s a 40-year-old guy with little kids --

JACKSON: Because -- because I`ll explained to you why. Michael grew up -- we grew up in a room with bunk beds and all the brothers. Psychologically that never left him, the children together.

BEHAR: I know but you grew up that way, too, and you didn`t do that.

JACKSON: No. I`m still around kids all the time.

BEHAR: You have them in your bedroom?

JACKSON: Absolutely. There`s nothing wrong with that. If I`m responsible for kids and their parents leave them with me, what`s wrong with it? Because that`s never going to cross my mind of doing anything like that. You see, the world today is so demented and so sick that they look at these things the wrong way.

My brother never touched anyone and they knew this and the media knew this too. But they figure, oh, let`s say Michael did this. Why? Because it`s going to create ratings. It`s going to create newspapers. They knew the difference. They knew the truth.

In the book, I speak about all of this. Because when you talk about him, you`re talking about all of us.

BEHAR: Yes.

JACKSON: We`re family, we`re the Jacksons. He`s carrying my name, I`m carrying his.

BEHAR: Well, just -- I think it just has that appearance, you know. And after the molestation charges, he continued to do it. Why do it?

JACKSON: Because he did nothing wrong. He has a wonderful love for children. What you have to realize is --

(CROSSTALK)

BEHAR: And didn`t you want to have -- yes.

BEHAR: -- Michael is a kid himself. You`re looking at Michael through grown-up eyes.

BEHAR: A little bit of an arrested development, would you say?

JACKSON: He`s looking at kids through child`s eyes because he didn`t have a childhood. There was never -- none of that.

BEHAR: And didn`t you want to whisk him away to Bahrain if those charges held up and he went to jail?

JACKSON: No. That`s not true. Because you have to be --

BEHAR: Well, tell me what it was. Straighten me out.

JACKSON: You have to -- why do they do this?

BEHAR: It`s in the book.

JACKSON: For me to be here, you can rest assured I have researched and made sure everything in this book is true.

BEHAR: Ok. So it`s not true that you were going to escape with him, take him out of the country?

JACKSON: Let me tell you. Let me explain to you.

BEHAR: Go ahead.

JACKSON: Watching my brother being handcuffed for no reason, nine counts of what? What? At the same time, child services, even before these counts, cleared him, investigated him, there`s nothing that he did.

And he knew this, too. At the same time, all this is going on, I`m watching this --

BEHAR: You were worried.

JACKSON: Worried?

BEHAR: You were worried maybe he would not get off -- the charges would not be dropped.

JACKSON: He would not get a fair trial. After hearing the judge say when he had fallen, he went to the hospital and came back, the judge said, if he`s not back in 45 minutes, we`re sending him to jail. This is what they wanted to do.

BEHAR: All right, Jermaine. Thank you very much for this. OK.

His book is called "You Are Not Alone."

Good night, everybody.
 
^^ Jermaine more or less tells here why that all happened in 1993, since they are talking so much about the private life of Michael, why just don´t say it..
 
Jermaine DID NOT make the NYT Best sellers TOP 35 list.

Check all categories...he is no where to be found. I checked fiction...& nonfiction. Like Latoya & Janet, He should have written an Advice & misc. book: "Leaving with Jealousy for 40+ years" or "How to bed your brother's wife" .... these would be best sellers.



http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2011-10-09/hardcover-nonfiction/list.html


In the UK, he entered the Non Fiction at #18, last weekend, even though it didn't make the combined list...but this week, the book is already out of the charts.

http://www.thebookseller.com/node/53930

All these headlines about "Plan B"...all these interviews....SMDH
 
Last edited:
I was listening to a podcast of Jermaine's interview with Richard Bacon on BBC Radio 5 Live last night. And I have to say, I was quite it's made me quite disappointed in Jermaine, as I have been in most of his interviews in the last month, for a specific reason. Jermaine never said anything negative about Michael, and he defends Michael with love and I like the fact he wants to take on the media and defend Michael.

My problem with Jermaine is, I don't feel his answers to the specific question out the out of court settlement in 1994 with Jordan Chandler is answered properly in an articulate manner by Jermaine. I thought Richard Bacon's questions where fair about Michael to Jermaine, even though some were the standard negative questions, him asking why Michael "payed off" Jordan Chandler. Now, we as fans know Michael never paid off Jordan Chandler and the out of court civil court settlement, was something agreed by both parties. And that the out of court settlement, don't stop the criminal investigation and that it went to a Grand Jury to see of Michael should be charged in late 1994 (9-10 months after the settlement), which he wasn't. And that the police could have forced Jordan Chandler to give evidence if the police felt they had. Jermaine never mentions, that the out of court settlement was completely separate to the police investigation, and that Evan Chandler launched a civil court case against Michael only 2-3 weeks in to the criminal investigation. Jermaine's answer though accurate, that the Chandler's only wanted the money, and if your child was abused you wouldn't accept money is accurate. He gives credibility in his short answer that in the media's twisting of history, that Michael paid Jordan Chandler off. He doesn't convince his interviewers with that short "they just wanted money answers, and Michael was on tour when he paid the money". Because that's not fully accurate, as Michael wasn't on tour in January 1994 when the out of court settlement was made, he was in the USA.

I also don't like it when Jermaine (and also Katherine) say that Jordan Chandler has admitted Michael never abused him. This also makes Michael look worse, as there is no proof Jordan Chandler has admitted anything. They should really point out, that Jordan Chandler hasn't spoken to his parents in over a decade, which is true (though we don't know why). And that he had an opportunity to put Michael in jail when he was invited to testify in the 2005 trial. Which Jordan Chandler declined, and anyone who has been abused surely would want their abuser put in jail. This type of answer T-Mez would give, and he always puts interviewers in their place, or have them change their perspective as he talks using real facts.

Another thing is Evan Chandler, didn't kill himself because of guilt over Michael's death, but because he had a very painful cancer. Which is a known fact. We'd all love it, if he did kill himself because of Michael's death. But Evan Chandler, like many criminals has no compassion for others, he got the money he wanted couldn't care less about the pain he caused Michael who is the real victim of 1993.

I was really annoyed after listening to Jermaine's interview. I like and want Jermaine to defend Michael, but he should either get his facts 100% together and not use internet rumors and wishful thinking to defend Michael. Remember to point out the civil lawsuit and their was never a pay off. If he can't or won't point out those facts, and the same with other Jackson family members including Katherine. Then he shouldn't do interviews about Michael that touch on the subject of Jordan Chandler, and leave that to the likes of Howard Weitzman who worked for Michael on those false abuse accusations/extortion, or T-Mez who knows everything about it as he's read right through the case.

I know their are issues with fans about Jermaine. He gets on my nerves with his stories that him and Michael were going to go in to business and build hotels (I doubt that would have happened), and that some of the O2 Arena concerts where going to be Jackson 5 concerts (he said these things in an interview on Loose Women), which may have some truth but I presume just as guests on the medley part of Michael's concerts. But I do like Jermaine, and like I feel Michael's estate failed Michael with that "Michael" album, I feel like Jermaine can and should be doing much better than he is.
 
Last edited:
Jermaine just can't help himself.....both he and LaToya never saw a camera they did'nt like. If they can't explain themselves properly in the media then they should stay the heck away from doing interviews. Sometimes it comes off like they really don't know what they are talking about.
 
Jacksons try to act like they knew what was going on in mjs life but just make themselves look even more stupid when they come out with such statements. how about they just admit the truth. they seem to be the only ppl in this world that still live in the tight nit fantasy.while the rest of the world knows they aint the waltons. just cause they are related doesnt mean he knows anything about mj adult life but the media will milk them for all they can get. at least the cascio book will actually come from someone who knew and spent time with mj.
 
Last edited:
Jermaine Jackson on 'PIERS MORGAN TONIGHT' 10/1

CNN.com - Transcripts

Interview With Jermaine Jackson

Aired October 1, 2011 - 21:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.


PIERS MORGAN, CNN HOST: Tonight, what really happened to Michael Jackson.

JERMAINE JACKSON, MICHAEL JACKSON'S BROTHER: This is a story about greed and power.

MORGAN: Jermaine Jackson, who he blamed for his brother's death.

Do you think there may be some kind of cover-up?

JACKSON: What do you think? I would think that as a family member, yes.

MORGAN: The emotional true story of Michael's life.

JACKSON: It's like they pushed and pushed and pushed this bird who was injured, his wings were injured, and they wanted him to push him off the cliff and expected him to fly and he fell.

MORGAN: And his death.

JACKSON: What were they concerned about? Their money, their jobs or my brother's health?

MORGAN: The real story behind all those scandals.

JACKSON: If you don't think it hurt him when people called him "whacko Jackson." When they called him crazy and this and that.

MORGAN: And the Jackson family behind closed doors.

JACKSON: The crap and the garbage that has been written about my family for so many years and all these other books that were unauthorized, and people saying things that didn't know us.

MORGAN: Jermaine Jackson, the primetime exclusive. This is PIERS MORGAN TONIGHT.

Jermaine, I want to start with the imminent trial of Conrad Murray, Dr. Conrad Murray. Obviously, hugely significant for you and your family and for the world to try and discover if through the process of this trial, we work out what really happened to your brother Michael.

As we approach the start of this trial, what are your feelings?

JACKSON: My feelings are, just as well as the family, the truth is going to come out. And it's something that we've been long awaited for. And it's up to the point now where it's been a lot of speculation and hearsay, but I think we're all going to -- it's not going to bring closure but it's just going to give us a clear understanding of what really happened.

I think it's important that the fans and the public and -- as well as ourselves need to know what really happened. What took place. But there's so many things that happened that we weren't aware of as a family because we were kept away.

MORGAN: Do you think that Conrad Murray was solely responsible for your brother's death?

JACKSON: My gut feeling is the fact that Conrad was present during his death, there's a lot of questions to be answered. And we don't know yet. Until the trial unfolds and we sort of get the facts. Whether they'll come to the facts or not.

By doing the book, I got a clear understanding of a lot of things that I didn't know from the past. And how all these things came about with Michael's life and who he interacted with during his business and all those things. Up to present day.

MORGAN: I mean it seems to come down to this. I would imagine Conrad Murray's defense is going to be that he was encouraged to prescribe this Propofol drug to Michael that night. The drug that is believed to have killed him.

I would imagine that on your side you will be arguing as a family, and I'm sure the prosecutors will, too, that this was all Conrad Murray's decision. It then comes down to addiction. Whether Michael was addicted, what he was addicted to, and whether the prescription of this drug was just a part of that addiction. What do you think of that?

JACKSON: Well, I think that, first of all, being a cardiologist and not an anesthesiologist, there's a big difference. Conrad Murray (INAUDIBLE) had no business giving my brother Propofol. I just learned about this drug by doing the book.

In terms of them trying to say my brother was an addict or addicted, Michael, we know my brother was on prescription drugs. Whether it was Demerol because of pains, excruciating pain, and also him wanting to have sleep.

MORGAN: I mean that's the powerful part of your book.

JACKSON: Yes.

MORGAN: Michael just had this chronic inability to sleep. I mean I knew, having worked in the media for years, that he had a difficulty with it. I had no idea how bad it was. I mean he would literally be unable to get any sleep at all. Like night after night.

JACKSON: Well, just coming off the stage and there's like 180,000 people out there and your adrenaline is going so high, and you're doing so much and it's hard to just put your head on the pillow and sleep because it just goes on and on, even after you're off the stage.

He always said that he didn't want to tour because he didn't want to have the problems of not sleeping and having to take Demerol and things like that, but he wasn't addicted to it, because his behavior wasn't to the point that he was an addict. He was looking for this, too, for sleep. And he trusted whoever administered these things to him. He trusted them.

MORGAN: I mean when people hear about drug addictions like with celebrities they tend to think, you know, cocaine or ecstasy or heroin, whatever it may be. Clearly, we're not in that kind of situation with Michael. These were not drugs to make him high or get any kind of high experience. The drugs he was taking were all for pain and all for sleep.

JACKSON: Exactly.

MORGAN: Could it have been, though, that by the end, after years of insomnia, that he had become, in a way, addicted to any type of drug that would get him the sleep he craved? Do you think that's possible?

JACKSON: I really don't know but I do know that it's a difference between Demerol and Propofol. And --

MORGAN: Tell me about Propofol, because you studied this for your book.

JACKSON: Yes.

MORGAN: And it's fascinating what you found out. It's a much stronger drug than people realize.

JACKSON: It a much stronger drug. It puts you out and it's basically used when people are under the knife and they want to not feel the pain. But the key to this is, when you're a proven anesthesiologist and you're in the proper settings, and the right medical field, you know how much to administer to the patient to keep him above the line, but not so above where he'll feel the pain. And keep them from going below the line.

MORGAN: Is Propofol considered by most physicians to be an anesthetic, rather than just a sleeping pill?

JACKSON: I really don't know. But I do know for Michael to get sleep he had to be knocked out. And this wasn't just this one night. This was administered in him on an ongoing basis, which was causing his body to deteriorate and him to act differently and have different symptoms in his behavior.

MORGAN: You as a family, you were probably the closest to Michael of all the family. But collectively, you must have all known that he had this ongoing chronic problem with sleep in particular. When did you see Conrad Murray that night in the hospital?

JACKSON: I saw Conrad when I first went to the hospital. And then when I came back from seeing Michael I went back to the room where my mother was. I was sitting on the other side of the table, like I'm here, the table is between us, my mother is here and you're Conrad.

We weren't this close, though. I didn't know who he was. But I said, something strange about this guy. He's acting strange. I had formed that opinion before I found out who he was.

MORGAN: And when you say strange do you mean --

JACKSON: His behavior.

MORGAN: -- suspicious? Did he look guilty?

JACKSON: His behavior, how he was acting.

MORGAN: Did he look concerned?

JACKSON: Everything. All of the above. And it was just something that just wasn't right. It just wasn't normal.

MORGAN: Did you talk to him?

JACKSON: No, no.

MORGAN: Did he say anything to any of the family?

JACKSON: He wanted to come in, I guess, and say his -- something to my mother and his condolences or something but I felt uneasy with him.

MORGAN: Did you know that he'd been with Michael that night?

JACKSON: I found out, yes, that he was with Michael. He was there. But, see, this is a strange case because this is treated as a homicide and the LAPD who did their investigation and then there's the whereabouts of who came in and out of the house. The tapes are erased. And so we really don't know. There's a lot of questions. That's --

MORGAN: Which tapes were erased?

JACKSON: The surveillance tapes were erased.

MORGAN: They're all gone?

JACKSON: Well, some of the tapes were erased to the whereabouts who would come in and out during the time, at the house.

MORGAN: Who do you think would erase it?

JACKSON: They were in the hands of the police department.

MORGAN: Do you think there may be some kind of cover-up?

JACKSON: What do you think? I would think as a family member, yes.

MORGAN: Coming up, Michael's last tour, why Jermaine says it was too much for him.

JACKSON: They were only concerned about the show. Moving the show forward.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MORGAN: If you watch "This Is It", which I've done several times, you cannot dispute the fact that he seems to be in pretty good physical shape. The rehearsals are going great, the show looks amazing, he looks excited. This is not a portrait of a guy who is on the verge of death.

So I, as a fan of his, was shocked when I watched it to try and work out how it came to his death. You as a family member, it must be 10 times as shocked. Because you resumed, you were talking to him most days. And how often did you talk to Michael?

JACKSON: We spoke to him not that much during rehearsal. But we last saw him May 14th.

MORGAN: Do you know how long he had been given Propofol?

JACKSON: When -- when "This Is It" there was a lot of footage that was taken out that no one saw and because that was the edit before the edit. And it's just -- so much went on. So much went on.

MORGAN: And is that footage damaging? I mean do you see a guy in a bit of a daze? A bit of a zombie? I mean what is the stuff we didn't see?

JACKSON: Well, things that we noticed. And this is why the defense is going to try to paint my brother out to be a drug addict and he was very dependent on drugs, and it's not true. Because how could someone be dependent on drugs since 2008, he was dancing four hours a day and he had a five-year plan of starting a new life. And --

MORGAN: Well, let me throw something to you about this. I know somebody who's a very famous TV star. Very famous. One of the biggest stars in the world. Who's a friend of mine. Who takes sleeping pills every night to sleep because he finds the adrenaline, there's just too much going on. Been doing it for years.

That is a form of addiction. You know I was on Ambien after breaking some ribs for three and a half weeks once. When I tried to stop, it was like having a form of cold turkey for two or three weeks. It was -- these are strong drugs.

Propofol is significantly stronger than anything that this friend of mine takes or that I was taking that time. So if Michael was getting this stuff over a regular period of time, he could still be performing perfectly well but, as you say, underneath it, the damage would be pretty intensive, I would say.

JACKSON: That's the question. Michael has always had an anesthesiologist around him when he was taking things.

MORGAN: Someone who knew --

JACKSON: Whether I knew or not. MORGAN: Someone who knew about the process --

JACKSON: Yes.

MORGAN: -- of knocking somebody out for the purposes of sleep?

JACKSON: And plus, he's lived all this time doing Demerol and sleeping pills and also, pain pills, but the symptoms from Propofol is like no one knew that he was -- the public didn't know he was complaining about his body. One side being an ice cube. Another side being very warm.

MORGAN: Do you know how long he'd been taking it? Is there any evidence that you've seen?

JACKSON: I really don't know, but --

MORGAN: What is the family's belief? What is the theory that you think about that?

JACKSON: Our belief is that we knew he was doing prescription drugs to sleep and pain. We didn't know about Propofol. I just found out about this drug which I can't even pronounce hardly. But the symptoms, the reason why I want to talk about the symptoms because if you look at the past tours, we never heard of these symptoms that Michael -- not knowing whether to go right or left when he comes on stage.

MORGAN: Who was he -- who was he telling about the symptoms? The family?

JACKSON: No -- no, these are people that were around him. Him not being able to lift himself out of, what, five-pound prop or something, and repeating himself. And him, losing just unbelievable weight. And these are signs of toxic in your body.

MORGAN: Are these signs from what you've been able to work out of Propofol abuse? In other words, long-term use of that specific drug? Are these side effects that you have identified?

JACKSON: These are symptoms of that because of the fact that it was administered in him outside of a hospital setting, the person wasn't adequate enough to do this, and the fact that the night that he died, he was -- he had just arranged a $15 million payment on a house. So that's saying that he had plans of going beyond "This Is It." He has --

MORGAN: Do you think -- Michael was a tough character when it came to business. He knew his own mind. He was the most fabulously successful entertainer of his generation, and you know, by common agreement, when it came to his business, his craft, he could be a tough demanding task master of people. And also quite obstinate.

Is it possible, do you think, to be fair-minded to Conrad Murray for a moment, to be dispassionate, take yourself out of the family position for a moment. Is it possible knowing Michael, that he could have just ordered and demanded that Conrad Murray give him this drug?

That Conrad Murray, as I believe he's going to claim, had tried to resist it but eventually succumbed to pressure. Is that possible?

JACKSON: Whether it's possible or not, being a doctor, you take an oath. To care for your patient, not to kill them. You take an oath to do things that are proper in the medical world. Not to administer something outside of a hospital setting that's not even your area. You're a cardiologist, not an anesthesiologist.

MORGAN: Even if Michael had been --

JACKSON: Even if Michael had --

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: He could just say no.

JACKSON: It was -- he trusted doctors. Dr. Murray should have said no, under no circumstances, no. But the fact that these symptoms went on around everybody there who weren't concerned about how he felt. They were only concerned about the show. Moving the show forward.

MORGAN: These are people working for AEG?

JACKSON: These are people working for AEG, working for him, working for the show.

MORGAN: I mean, there was always a bit of a circus around Michael in his life. How many of the people directly around him at the time that he died, do you think, are culpable for a form of responsibility for his death?

JACKSON: See, that's the question I have. That's a question we have as a family, because I've said in the book, why didn't somebody call me or Jackie or Tito or Marlon or his family, to say, come down here, your brother is not acting normal? Had we been called he'd be alive today because we would have taken him to the hospital.

MORGAN: Why do you think they didn't?

JACKSON: Because they wanted the show to go on. Because they knew -- it's the same thing of knowing that it wasn't his voice 100 percent on those songs that were released. It's all about -- see, this is a story about greed and power and money. And not looking at the person in Michael.

What I've tried to do in this book is to show my little brother, us growing up as the Jackson 5, kids with a dream. The human side of him. No matter how great the success had became, he still is from a family. We're humans and --

MORGAN: And you basically believe, I think as a family, reading the book, that the pressure from the people who were putting on this huge extravaganza, this amazing tour -- I had tickets to the first night in London. I was very excited about it. I saw him perform live a few times. The greatest live performer I've ever seen. There were people there who had nearly billions of dollars, I mean, certainly, tens, hundreds of millions of dollars at stake on this tour being successful. And all the commercials been afterwards. It's not in their interest to raise any alarm bells about his health, is it?

JACKSON: No, because the fact that, still, if you have tens of billions of dollars, you still want more but this was an event that was going to put money in everybody's pockets but at the same time, his health was ignored. They -- it's like they pushed and pushed this bird who was injured, his wings were injured, and they wanted him to push him off the cliff and expected him to fly and he fell. He fell.

MORGAN: When you saw Michael after he died in the hospital, how did he physically look to you? Obviously, he was dead but how did he look in terms of the Michael you knew? Was it the same kind of body that you would expect?

JACKSON: No. No. He had gone from 150 to 55 down to 136. He was frail. He was thin. I touched his face. His face was still soft. I kissed his forehead and then I pulled one of his eyelids back because I wanted to look in his eyes. And -- but I couldn't believe that what I saw wasn't my brother.

And for people who'd been around him all these years, to see that and not say something, it bothers me, it bothers us as a family. What were they concerned? What were they concerned about? Money, their jobs, or my brother's health?

MORGAN: Do you believe you're going to get answers from this trial? Or this simply just not going to be enough evidence?

JACKSON: To tell you the truth, Piers, it's -- the defense is going to try to paint my brother out to be even most horrible person and he wasn't. He was most concerned about the world and healing the world and children who are starving. And he just didn't sing about it. He did it. He showed the action.

That's not the behavior of a drug addict. That's not the behavior of a person who is irresponsible, who just want to be high all day. He was never was the type of person that took drugs for recreation who was just irresponsible or didn't care.

So my -- to answer your question, we're not going to get Michael back. If Conrad Murray goes to jail, whatever happens, I really don't know. We lost an incredible human being, a brother who -- my little brother, who just really, cared about the world. To answer your question -- we really don't know.

We really don't know. I've written this book to show the world and to show the fans that this is who we are as a family. It was a long process. And it opened my eyes to a lot of things that I didn't know. The crap and the garbage that has been written about my family for so many years and all these other books that were unauthorized and people saying things that didn't know us.

And then thinking, we're from a small house in Gary, Indiana, with humble beginnings. So we were privy to crooks and people who had hidden agendas.

MORGAN: Were any of the family attend the trial?
 
Continued

Jermaine Jackson on 'PIERS MORGAN TONIGHT' 10/1


CNN.com - Transcripts

JACKSON: Oh, yes.

MORGAN: Will you get out?

JACKSON: Absolutely.

MORGAN: Every day?

JACKSON: I'm going to try to be there as much as I can, yes.

MORGAN: How do you think you'll feel when you see Conrad Murray standing there?

JACKSON: I don't feel good about him before I knew him so I'm kind of feel the same way. But what I want for this whole thing is for Michael's death not to be a question of murder. And people's hearts and their minds. There's too many people who loved him.

Do you know, Michael, he was -- he touched the hearts of many people around the world. That's important. That's why the world cried when he passed because they understood him.

MORGAN: Want to take a break now, Jermaine, and then come back and go back to those early days in Indiana. Go back to the young Michael and the dreams that he had and you all had as a family.

JACKSON: Sure.

MORGAN: We reached out to AEG, the producers of Michael Jackson's final tour but he declined to comment o tonight's Jackson's statements, and they ignored the Michael Jackson's frail health or pushed him too hard.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MORGAN: Jermaine, you've written this extraordinarily honest, frank and open book. It's called "You are Not Alone: Michael Through a Brother's Eyes." You were his big brother. What was he like as a young guy? Michael. Describe the Michael before it all became like a circus.

JACKSON: Michael was a very joyful kid. He was very fast on his feet. He was always into things. He was a bit nosey at times. He was a kid who always had dreams and he wanted to play store. And he -- I'd tell a story of how we were looking out the window and singing the Christmas songs and watching the snow fall, and looking at our neighbor's homes because we were not allowed to have Christmas being Jehovah Witnesses.

So these are things that he missed. That if you know the song "Childhood "it says a lot about his life.

MORGAN: I mean do you ever wish as a family, and I've interviewed Janet and LaToya this year and they've been quite revealing about this. Do you ever wish that you hadn't gone through the door marked superstardom to fame.

JACKSON: That's a good question. I've always been told I never left and I'm still that boy back in Gary because no matter where we come from, we never forget that little house and my father being laid off at the Indian Steel, and picking up potatoes to feed us and the ongoing rehearsals all the time. And being taught to stick together. Stick together. You're a family, not a business. You're a family.

MORGAN: I mean, we're here in California now, you've got this beautiful home. It's very luxurious. You've got amazing stuff you've collected all on a material level. They're the badges of great success that you've enjoyed with your and your family. But do you have peace of mind?

I mean did you lose peace of mind getting the way you've gotten?

JACKSON: No, because we've always known that this was just an illusion. And see, success is nothing. It's what you share with one another as a family. It's like, to prove my point, Michael was loved by so many people. And during the trial, the whole world was accusing him of child molestation and saying the most horrible things.

And all this stuff happened. And at the end of the day, what has true value is seeing his family there and supporting him. All this material stuff has no value at all. I mean he's gone. He can't take Neverland with him, the catalog, nothing. It's just he left a lot of good deeds and --

MORGAN: And he wasn't -- I mean Michael was a -- a contrary figure. You know, I interviewed him once. And he had a very gentle, sweet voice when talking about his family and children and so on. And then when I talked to him about business, it was like his voice dropped a couple of octaves and he switched into game mode. And it was very revealing to me that he was quite a chameleon.

You know, he had different characters depending on what you were discussing, I guess who he was with and so on. He had a tough streak to him, as well.

But I also felt that he was not addicted to fame, but he loved a lot being a huge star. You know, he played that role very well and have played up to.

He'd go on the million dollar shopping sprees. He'd have the amazing cars, the jets, Neverland and so on. There was a large part of when I he loved, which he craved.

JACKSON: Yes, no. There's -- there's no question he loved enjoying his -- his life. But at the same time, he became a victim of his success. And it -- he became withdrawn. And then when the "Thriller" offer came, you know, for major success and that's when all the Wacko Jacksons and the craziness and he's eccentric -- he's lost his mind, all these things they started calling him.

This was someone who never forgot how we were taught. You care about people. People have feelings. He had a lot of feelings.

You don't think it hurt him when people called him Wacko Jackson, or when they called him crazy and this and that?

And there were moments of things that happened --

MORGAN: But don't you think he slightly encouraged that impression by people?

I mean he would -- he would do strange things quite deliberately, I always felt, as a marketing tool. It made him much more interesting.

JACKSON: Some --

MORGAN: And so he played up to a lot of the things, didn't he?

JACKSON: Not so much of the Wacko Jackson. But the incident with a child. He got caught up in the moment.

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: Let me ask you about that that. Let me -- let me just play, again, devil's advocate, a little bit. When he did that, I couldn't have imagined you doing that with any or your kids. So, Michael wasn't -- he didn't play life rules by the same rules that we all do. I mean I would never have done that to one of my children. I don't think you would have done.

(CROSSTALK)

JACKSON: But --

MORGAN: It was so obviously dangerous.

JACKSON: But, Piers, the see, we do things with children without knowing it. I agree, he -- he got caught up in -- in the moment. It was just an exciting moment.

But we've always -- we've all taken a child and tossed them up in the air and caught them. We've all done it.

MORGAN: Not over a balcony.

JACKSON: No, no. Not -- exactly. But when -- when children are falling, they lose their breath. So we've all done things.

But he was showing the fans his child. I agree it wasn't the smartest thing to do, but he got caught up in the moment.

MORGAN: What I always felt when he did stuff like that -- was it kind of propagated the myth that he wasn't entirely normal.

I mean did you feel that you lost the -- the little brother you once had, that he became something else? How did you feel as his brother?

JACKSON: Michael wasn't -- he was very, very much normal. How could someone write the songs that he wrote, you know, "Man in the Mirror," "Hero Hear the World," "Earth Song," and not be concerned about the most important things in life, about preserving this -- this world and making this place a better place to live for one another?

These are the most important things. See, these are things that we don't look at.

At the same time, he's a human being. Those final nights of "This Is It," I wish people would have looked at the human person and not the superstar and say, we ought to get him out. We need -- there's something wrong.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

(SINGING)

(END VIDEO CLIP)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MORGAN: Your father was a tough guy, though, wasn't he?

JACKSON: My father was tough, but that's still love, because you care to discipline your child and to show them the right path to take.

MORGAN: The most interesting aspect of your father, from the book, I think, which is the racism that your father endured when he was young and how that may have been a very motivating, driving factor for the way he became, that he was determined to combat that, not just for him, but for his family, as well.

JACKSON: We didn't want color to hold us back. We were taught -- we knew there was racism, but we wasn't going to use that as a card. But we knew that it existed.

But at the same time, we wanted to go beyond color. We wanted to have a music and a message that transformed color.

So we -- we knew that it existed, but it didn't stop us. We wanted to go beyond that. We -- we wanted to bring -- that's why we loved the peacock, because of the different colors coming together. And our whole thing is everything --

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: What is the true --

JACKSON: -- coming together.

MORGAN: As his big brother, what is the truth about Michael's skin color change over the years?

JACKSON: Michael --

MORGAN: Was any part of that a reaction to this stuff that was going on when he was young, this race, violence, threats and so on? Was any part of him wishing he wasn't so black?

JACKSON: No. Not at all. Michael was happy with -- Michael suffered from a disease called vitiligo. It is the pigmentation of the skin on his body, which I said in the book -- there was -- one morning, he had slipped and fell. And he went to the hospital.

And so I came over. And my mother was there and my father was there. And he was very sad, because he said that he is the most misunderstood person in the world. And pulled off his shirt and just patches of his -- his brown skin.

That's why he wore the umbrella, because the sun would just make it worse. And there was a stage of lupus that he had, too. And it was just one of those things. Yes, he --

MORGAN: But all this stuff, again, that people used against Michael to make out he was slightly crazy, you, as a family member, were close to him, his big brother, saw that it wasn't that at all.
 
Continued

Jermaine Jackson on 'PIERS MORGAN TONIGHT' 10/1


CNN.com - Transcripts

JACKSON: But see, this book is so important because all the questions that people had in their -- their -- their minds, I tried to answer these -- these questions by giving the facts. And I defy anybody who reads the book and not tells just up to his -- his death that something doesn't smell. Something smells. And that was -- those are the questions, as a family member, that's in my mind, in my mother's, in my father's.

We're waiting for this trial, but what is it really going to do for us?

We really don't know.

We really don't know.

MORGAN: We'll take another break now. And when we come back, I want to talk to you more about Michael, what he became like as an adult, how difficult he found it when "Thriller" became the biggest selling album in history.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MORGAN: Do you think when Michael became the biggest star in the world, after "Thriller," did it change him, do you think?

I mean, you were his big brother.

How did you see that impact on him as a human being?

JACKSON: Well, I do know that he wanted that. He wanted to sell the most albums ever. And he wrote it on his mirror in his bathroom at the -- at the Havenhearst (ph) house. He would look at it, see it, live it, believe it. That's -- that's what we were taught where we were young.

And he would visualize it and he -- he wrote that on his mirror and also to sell out stadiums.

MORGAN: Well, the strange thing about him is that as he got ever more successful and richer, his self-esteem levels seemed to deteriorate. And I -- I -- to illustrate that, he kept having more and more plastic surgery to, I guess, in his eyes, improve his looks.

And when I talked to Janet, she also talked of self-esteem issues. And La Toya did, too, as well.

Michael -- and Michael, I think, clearly had it, otherwise why would he keep trying to change the way he looked?

What was -- what was your view?

JACKSON: No, but I -- I think he -- he wanted to change the way he looked because he wanted to improve things. I mean, it's -- it's like if you have a zit on your face, you use -- you want to pop it.

MORGAN: Right.

JACKSON: If you see something on your face whether your ears are too big, your nose is too flat or your chin is too long, you want to improve it. I -- I wouldn't say it comes from self -- self-esteem. But there are surgeons out there, especially in Hollywood. And for people in Hollywood to talk about this, I mean most of Hollywood has been up under the knife. And -- and his whole thing was he wanted to correct things and to make things look better.

But I wish that he would have looked at the beauty of himself.

MORGAN: Yes, he was a good looking guy.

JACKSON: He was --he was just a natural beauty within and out. But --

MORGAN: But doesn't that tell you -- I don't want to hammer this point, but doesn't that tell you he must have had -- it wasn't just about wanting to look better. It's more to do with not being happy with how he looked.

JACKSON: Well, not so much of not being happy, but he just wanted to make things better.

MORGAN: Was it like making a record for him?

He comes -- is he about -- was he just a perfectionist?

JACKSON: He -- he -- I think in his mind, he had something that he was going after and -- but -- but these things -- once -- once you start, you get caught up into it and then you want to do a little here and there.

But he was still the Michael that we knew, the eyes, the heart, the feeling, the emotions and how he felt for people. That would never change.

MORGAN: You -- you clearly feel, Jermaine, that your brother is going to get trashed in this court case.

JACKSON: Well, look what they did in the -- in -- in the child molestation case. They painted him out to be the most horrible person and saying the most horrible things. And I'm sitting there. And just imagine you being Michael and you're sitting there and you, all your life, want to do nothing but good. And you're hearing these things that you've done and people who you trusted to come into your home is now sitting on the stand lying and saying the most hurting things.

It's hard. It's been tough for -- for him.

MORGAN: I remember -- I remember all that. And it just always struck me that I didn't know enough about the reality of the truth, certainly not in the position that you were. It just seemed to me that Michael, he did stuff that was -- to the public, just looked a bit inappropriate, especially as he got older.

Did you ever think as his big brother of warning him, it may not be a good idea to have sleep-overs with young boys, because people won't get it. They won't understand what you're doing.

JACKSON: See, but I'm the same way, because what's wrong with sleep- overs? What's wrong with sleep-overs with -- with kids?

It's only the demented mind that thinks something different. It's like Michael said it best, why do you -- why do you relate the bed to sex? We can have sex standing up. We can have sex in the car, outside, on the ground. And during those times when he was sharing his bed, he was on the floor.

But at the same time, these are people/'s minds who were demented. Like they were saying Neverland was used to bring in kids and to molest them. And when you go to Neverland, the wheelchair ramp going up to the rides. He was concerned about bringing the joy to kids who were terminally ill, who were dying of all types of diseases.

This is -- this is a man who lived his life according to God's will. This is a man who really cared about people. And it's so sad, because this world didn't look at that until after he was dead. And he was trying to say this all along while he was alive.

MORGAN: But when you watched the Martin Bashir interview, the infamous interview, clearly Michael did that to try and set the record straight, and, if anything, made it 10 times worse.

When you watched that, what did you feel about that interview?

JACKSON: Well, first of all, Martin Bashir needs to be slapped and he never should have been around Michael. And there again, Michael trusted. And -- and see, why this -- there's a question for us, why does people in the media want to say the most horrible things about someone, knowing that they have all the right intentions to do good?

MORGAN: I guess the answer, if I'm putting my media hat back on, because I worked in newspapers at the time of all that, is that it's not normal -- I use that word in, you know, just in a straightforward way -- for a guy of, say, 44, to be sharing a bed with a boy of 12. That -- it's not what most men of 44 do.

So when the public hear about this --

JACKSON: But how do you know that?

MORGAN: -- or the media --

JACKSON: How do you know that?

MORGAN: I just --

JACKSON: How do you know that?

MORGAN: I just guess -- I don't anybody like that.

JACKSON: No, but you can't just guess, because see, that happens all over the world and people don't think of that as people --

MORGAN: But do you believe that?

JACKSON: Yes. Yes.

MORGAN: You do?

JACKSON: Absolutely. Absolutely.

MORGAN: I don't think it does.

JACKSON: Yes, it does, because --

MORGAN: And I'm not casting aspersion over Michael. I'm saying I don't think it does happen all over the world. Was Michael too innocent for this modern world, do you think?

JACKSON: Absolutely.

MORGAN: You really believe that, that he was just from a different era?

JACKSON: He was from the era that -- that we were from. I wish that we were around him more to tell him, Michael, get this person away from you because they have a hidden agenda, whether it was the -- all the people who accused him of -- of the -- of the child molestation, but at the same time, he saw the good in people, the good.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MORGAN (voice-over): When we come back, the trial and why Jermaine doesn't want Michael's children there.

JACKSON: I don't think they should be there. I think they should stay away from the TV because they're going to say the most horrible things.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MAGIC JOHNSON, FORMER NBA BASKETBALL PLAYER: This is celebration of his life, of his legacy.

BROOKE SHIELDS, ACTRES: He was caring and funny, honest, pure. And he was a lover of life.

PARIS JACKSON, SON OF MICHAEL JACKSON: Daddy has been the best father you could ever imagine.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MORGAN: How are his three children?

JACKSON: Very, very, very well. We've made sure that they were in a school and we're constantly monitoring their whereabouts and their interactions with -- with kids at school. Because today, there are drugs in schools, in private schools, in public schools, everything.

But see, it's hard to sort of shelter them and keep them away from it. They have to grow up and be human beings. And -- and, you know, they --

MORGAN: Do they -- do they use the Internet and stuff like that?

JACKSON: They do, but we don't like it. We don't like it.

MORGAN: Because there's so much stuff about their father --

JACKSON: Yes.

MORGAN: It must be difficult.

JACKSON: It is very hard. We -- we want them to stay off the Internet and that's very, very, very tough. That's got to be monitored more.

MORGAN: Do any of them show any signs of wanting to follow in Michael's footsteps as entertainers?

JACKSON: They're very much into film. They're very much into film. They know about directors, producers and movies. And they have interests to be in front and behind the camera.

MORGAN: Who do you think has the -- the most chance of being a successful actor or actress?

JACKSON: Well, Paris is -- is -- is a star. And Prince is -- I -- I think Prince is into film now, too. He's -- they're all going to acting --

MORGAN: But here's the thing. You -- you have the choice now, because you're one of the elder family members here who can control the way these kids' lives go. Given everything that happened to Michael and to you and to your brothers and sisters and your family, does any part of you want to stop that train right now for those kids and say, go and be a -- go and be a banker, go and be a doctor, go and do something completely different? Do not go down this path, because it's -- there are so many pitfalls?

Or does the good that you've enjoyed from all this outweigh the -- the bad?

JACKSON: The good definitely outweighs the bad. But what advice that I would give, no matter how great the success is, family comes first. When you've got your family, the vultures, the crooks, they can't penetrate that circle, because there's strength in numbers. And when the family is close, no one can get in between that.

Michael had gotten away from the family.

MORGAN: How will you handle the trial with regard to the kids?

Are they going to go to court?

Are they going to be able to watch any of the television coverage?

It's going to be wall to wall. It's going to be a huge news story for several months.

JACKSON: That's my mother's call. I don't think they should be there. I think they should stay away from the TV because they're going to say the most horrible things. They're going to try to. And they don't need to hear that, because they know who their father was and we know who our brother was. And it's just -- that's a defense approach.

MORGAN: Michael is not here to protect himself now. When this trial starts, if you feel that he's getting unfairly trashed in there, how are you going to deal with that?

JACKSON: Michael's done so much good and so many good deeds that he's well protected. We know where he is. It -- it hurts every day. It hurts my mother. It hurts my brothers, my sisters. It hurts the fans. But the life that he lived on this -- on this earth, it was a good life, but it was also a bad life, because they were after him. They were after him because they didn't believe the good -- the good in him.

MORGAN: This is going to be a tough time for you and your family for the next few weeks.

I wish you luck with it, Jermaine.

And thank you for being so honest.

JACKSON: Thank you.

MORGAN: It's an extraordinary book. I commend people to read it. They'll get a much better understanding, I think, of what your brother was really like.

JACKSON: Thank you.

MORGAN: So I appreciate you spending the time. Jermaine, thank you very much.

JACKSON: Thank you very much.

MORGAN: That's all for us tonight.
 
Thanks for posting cassiemollie, i think that's the interview that Jermaine gave a couple of weeks back for his book. Maybe they aired the prog again. SMH at his quote re what happened 25 june, 'My gut feeling is that murray was present during michael's death.' I give thanks he's not the prosecution attorney.
 
I think some people get way too emotionally invested in what other people do surrounding Michael.. make sites and be a part of a NON SUPPORTER group of the show etc.. Even if Michael himself was not a part he'd just have his spokeperson of the time release a statement saying he is not a part of the show and wont attend, has no affiliation.

Every time family stated they are doing something including MJ that's all he ever did.. so why would we do more?
 
Jermaine just can't help himself.....both he and LaToya never saw a camera they did'nt like. If they can't explain themselves properly in the media then they should stay the heck away from doing interviews. Sometimes it comes off like they really don't know what they are talking about.

I agree.

After watching Branca & Weiztman on Piers Morgan, Read Liza Minelli's interview in the UK, it's now so obvious how inarticulate the Jacksons are. It's embarrassing.

Truth is, they really don't know what they are talking about. MJ didn't want them in his entourage. And that's all we need to know.
 
I was listening to a podcast of Jermaine's interview with Richard Bacon on BBC Radio 5 Live last night. And I have to say, I was quite it's made me quite disappointed in Jermaine, as I have been in most of his interviews in the last month, for a specific reason. Jermaine never said anything negative about Michael, and he defends Michael with love and I like the fact he wants to take on the media and defend Michael.

My problem with Jermaine is, I don't feel his answers to the specific question out the out of court settlement in 1994 with Jordan Chandler is answered properly in an articulate manner by Jermaine. I thought Richard Bacon's questions where fair about Michael to Jermaine, even though some were the standard negative questions, him asking why Michael "payed off" Jordan Chandler. Now, we as fans know Michael never paid off Jordan Chandler and the out of court civil court settlement, was something agreed by both parties. And that the out of court settlement, don't stop the criminal investigation and that it went to a Grand Jury to see of Michael should be charged in late 1994 (9-10 months after the settlement), which he wasn't. And that the police could have forced Jordan Chandler to give evidence if the police felt they had. Jermaine never mentions, that the out of court settlement was completely separate to the police investigation, and that Evan Chandler launched a civil court case against Michael only 2-3 weeks in to the criminal investigation. Jermaine's answer though accurate, that the Chandler's only wanted the money, and if your child was abused you wouldn't accept money is accurate. He gives credibility in his short answer that in the media's twisting of history, that Michael paid Jordan Chandler off. He doesn't convince his interviewers with that short "they just wanted money answers, and Michael was on tour when he paid the money". Because that's not fully accurate, as Michael wasn't on tour in January 1994 when the out of court settlement was made, he was in the USA.

I also don't like it when Jermaine (and also Katherine) say that Jordan Chandler has admitted Michael never abused him. This also makes Michael look worse, as there is no proof Jordan Chandler has admitted anything. They should really point out, that Jordan Chandler hasn't spoken to his parents in over a decade, which is true (though we don't know why). And that he had an opportunity to put Michael in jail when he was invited to testify in the 2005 trial. Which Jordan Chandler declined, and anyone who has been abused surely would want their abuser put in jail. This type of answer T-Mez would give, and he always puts interviewers in their place, or have them change their perspective as he talks using real facts.

Another thing is Evan Chandler, didn't kill himself because of guilt over Michael's death, but because he had a very painful cancer. Which is a known fact. We'd all love it, if he did kill himself because of Michael's death. But Evan Chandler, like many criminals has no compassion for others, he got the money he wanted couldn't care less about the pain he caused Michael who is the real victim of 1993.

I was really annoyed after listening to Jermaine's interview. I like and want Jermaine to defend Michael, but he should either get his facts 100% together and not use internet rumors and wishful thinking to defend Michael. Remember to point out the civil lawsuit and their was never a pay off. If he can't or won't point out those facts, and the same with other Jackson family members including Katherine. Then he shouldn't do interviews about Michael that touch on the subject of Jordan Chandler, and leave that to the likes of Howard Weitzman who worked for Michael on those false abuse accusations/extortion, or T-Mez who knows everything about it as he's read right through the case.

I know their are issues with fans about Jermaine. He gets on my nerves with his stories that him and Michael were going to go in to business and build hotels (I doubt that would have happened), and that some of the O2 Arena concerts where going to be Jackson 5 concerts (he said these things in an interview on Loose Women), which may have some truth but I presume just as guests on the medley part of Michael's concerts. But I do like Jermaine, and like I feel Michael's estate failed Michael with that "Michael" album, I feel like Jermaine can and should be doing much better than he is.


I agree with pretty much everything you said, except perhaps the bit in bold. Only because T-Mez gave a talk after the trial in 2005 saying that he had witnesses who were going to come in to say that Jordan Chandler told them that Mike never abused him and he could never forgive his parents for forcing him to say that.
 
I am waiting for that day this boy comes forward and speaks the truth. What stops him?
 
I loved every part of Jermaine's book, I really did. Well, there were a few awkward moments - the opening prologue was a bit cringe-worthy, and for a book that was meant to be about Michael, he managed to squeeze some details in about his own life that really didn't make sense to be there, haha! But I felt Jermaine was honest through and through, he finally explained his feelings behind the Word2theBADD situation and I really admired him for stepping up to the plate and admitting he did the wrong thing. However after seeing the story behind it, I would've been as angry as he was.

Jermaine didn't pretend to be close to Michael during the 90's/2000's in the book, he readily admits that Michael had drifted from the family. But unlike fans seem to think, this was NOT Michael's doing. It was due to the people around him that built such a wall that his family had trouble getting through. I believe this story, not the crap that Michael didn't want to be apart of his family any more. Yes there were times that he distanced himself from members such as LaToya and Joe for each of their bad decisions, but overall I don't think his plan was to ever separate himself entirely from his family. Point blank, he loved them. They loved him.

I really enjoyed more so the pre-Thriller details, but there was some great stories in there too that really humanised Michael for me. Like the event detailing Michael wanting to buy the llamas, and the guy giving him and Jermaine attitude because of their race. Loved hearing Michael standing up against that crap! And the little details like him listening to music on most mornings on the way to court in 2005. Just small things that made him more human.

I'm not understanding where most of this hate is coming from. I understand that Jermaine can be a complete douchebag at times, but for me this book has redeemed him in my eyes. I suspect most fans that are spewing hate against him haven't actually sat down and read the book seriously. If you read it page to page, EVERY page, you will realise that there is no need for most of this negativity. I never got the feeling that Jermaine was trying to say that he was close to Michael in later years or that he knew what was going on. He only shared information privy to him, and yes at times there were parts to do with TII that seemed to be only second hand knowledge, but I was very surprised to hear the EXACT same details come out in court over the past, few weeks from people like Kenny and etc. So while it was second-hand information, it was still the CORRECT information.

Give the book a chance. Come down off these little soapboxes a lot of you seem to be on. The Jackson family is NOT as bad as you all paint them out to be.
 
I did give this book a chance and read it. What I think is that book is full of excuses for why Jermaine and the family hounded Michael.

Unlike kindofdisco above me, blaming Michael's people for the separation doesn't fly. For one reason Michael went through several staff members over his lifetime. There is next to no one in his staff that was there from beginning to end, so I don't believe there was a universal conspiracy by everyone Michael hired to keep himself from his family. There is also the fact that Michael saw who he wanted. These people didn't keep him for Liz, Mac, and the Cisaco(sp), but they all just decided to separated him from his family, but still gave him access to his mother and even Janet for some reason, I don't believe. I also of the mind that Michael was a grown man and if he really wanted to see his family, he would had done so and I doubt his people could had blocked him.

I also don't quite believe his story about Word2theBadd. The reason why is because Jermaine has given multiple reasons why this song happened and they are all slightly different. The truth should be unchanging and this is the first time he even mentioned Babyface. He even denies even writing the song and he only sang it despite his name being on the writing credits. So, I still don't feel Jermaine is being completely honest and still trying to push some blame on others for his own stupid mistake.

The little stories are cute, but there strikes me as something wrong with some of them. Like he goes into some detail about the inspiration of Smooth Criminal. I have to wonder how he even knows some of this given that by his own words he didn't really talk to Michael at that time. In fact, allot of his stories about Michael's music creation sounds like something he took from several sources.

There is also the fact that Jermaine claimed Michael loved the Victory Tour and being with his brothers. For him, the only reason why the Victory Tour ended was because Michael got sick of the politics. This makes little sense given that Michael dealt with the same BS on his own solo tours and he still didn't want to tour with his brothers. There also been several people, including, Michael who said he didn't care for Victory Tour. The fact that he never did another concert again with his family should be a clue that it was more of the politics he didn't like. Jermaine also failed to mention the biggest problem of the tour, namely the ticket system. He didn't even whisper this and about how Michael caught all the BS for that. He even gave the impression that Michael liked Don King and it was Michael's people who turned him against him. I heavily doubt this and I doubt he laughed at Don King's statement about Michael always being a Nig*** and he had to accept that.

He also gave an explanation early on to why his family kept bothering him with projects. He talked about how Michael like hearing feedback from them, which is why they had no problem calling him about different stuff. On a different note, he changed his mind about drugs. When Michael first died Jermaine clearly said he was unaware of any drug problems what so ever and was only vaguely aware of medication he took for his burns. Now, he acts like he knew the entire time and knew exactly what he was taking on different dates. This is a minor point, but it shows Jermaine's habit of changing his story to fit what he wants at the moment.

Finally to the TII part. Some of what Jermaine said is true, not all of it as kindofdisco kind of suggests. According to Jermaine, Michael was pushed around by his staff and AEG, something no one but TINI and Karen has claimed. I also don't believe for a moment Michael was crying for his dad. Jermaine also said something to the extent that Michael was sick for weeks, not the one day Kenny said. He also did try to push some of the blame towards AEG for not calling the family. Despite the fact that Michael is grown and they're not obligated to call anyone.

All and all, if you chose to take Jermaine at his word and don't think too much about certain parts it's a good book to read. However, if you don't quite believe Jermaine and take his history of not completely telling the truth in account, some of the stuff he has to say either comes off as excuses or truths he bend to fit his ideals.
 
Both Ramona and kindofdisco have put this together in great form! thanks for that. I'm almost halfway through the book so can't give a detailed opinion yet. But I certainly recognize parts of both your stories!
 
Jermaine didn't pretend to be close to Michael during the 90's/2000's in the book, he readily admits that Michael had drifted from the family. But unlike fans seem to think, this was NOT Michael's doing. It was due to the people around him that built such a wall that his family had trouble getting through. I believe this story, not the crap that Michael didn't want to be apart of his family any more. Yes there were times that he distanced himself from members such as LaToya and Joe for each of their bad decisions, but overall I don't think his plan was to ever separate himself entirely from his family. Point blank, he loved them. They loved him.

Michael Jackson was a grown man, no one and I do mean no one could've possibly blocked any communication between him and his family if HE did'nt want it that way. Hello??? he could've picked up a phone himself, did'nt need someone else to dial in order for him to speak to his family. For whatever reason Michael did distance himself from most of them at various times and that is a fact! Not some fan fiction. Its all too easy to put the blame on others, Jermaine and the rest surely knows why communication was lacking between them.
 
Thank you Exotic! Michael surely had no problem to keep in touch with Katherine, even when he was outside of the US he was flying her all over the world to spend time with him, how come 'his people' didn't prevent him from contacting her?! The point here is that Michael distanced himself from several if not all of his siblings, and many other relatives including Joe, due to a reason, he did not want them to be around, he had enough of them. That's the point, that doesn't mean he didn't love him, but he was fed up of being used by them, time after time again. He had enough. He didn't want to let people close to him who tried to force him to sell his assets, he had enough of people who were selling him out to the liked of Friedbrain and other media folks, he had enough of people who were spreading false rumors about reunion tours putting pressure onto him. He had enough. He was a grown man who made his own decisions and led his own life. I don't why this is so hard to fathom for some Jackson's and their stans, cuz it's really not that hard to grasp, if it didn't involve Michael Jackson is it?!
 
I believe that Michael loved his family but kept a distance from them. He always kept in touch with Katherine and the family knew this. They used her to get things to Michael. Even Katherine said that after the trial Michael trusted nobody. I would like to believe the family but where is the proof? It seemed to me that Michael did what he wanted to do. I am guessing here.
 
Back
Top