Jermaine's book is filled with thoughts from the follower fans, Michael's hairdresser, and various people. He admitted with the rest of his family that they had not spoken to Michael in a long time and that people kept Michael away, although they did see him briefly for the anniversary when Michael looked well, was happy, and excited. He knows nothing about Michael's life at the end from his own personal experience.
He knows a lot about the early Michael prior to 83, especially during the 70s and about Michael's comments about the trial when they were in the hospital. Anyone who does not know this should read some more facts, read some more threads here, or ask those who were around during and prior to Word to the Badd.
The problem people are having with the book is that Jermaine flip flops several times in his comments about his brother. When he is mad with him, he attacks him publicly by playing into the negative stereotypes and lies the media and public believe about Michael, e.g, Word to the Badd and the contents in the book he wrote with Brown. Further, he does these horrible things for money. Now he writes a more positive book, so someone here feels fans should throw praises all over Jermaine, when based on his history many cannot tell what is truth or lies.
Every person he introduced to Michael was a detriment to Michael's peace of mind, finances, and reputation, e.g, Thome and the Moonies. After Michael's death Jermaine was pushing for burial to be at Neverland, and then we remember that his friend Thome has one of his friends, Barak, as a minor shareholder of the property. The big question is whether Barak promised Jermaine some cash to have the family bury Michael there, so he could make some more money off the property.
Jermaine has a tendency to engage in questionable deals and when it gets too hot he backs out and leaves the others holding the bag, e.g., the book with Brown and running out of the granny snatching coup after things got too hot. Remember the aim of that coup was for all members to gain control of Michael's money. There is no need to thank Jermaine for that book. All the readers have to do is contact the people who told him the information and thank them instead.
How does he reconcile writing this 'positive" book about his brother, and then the next year, tries to take his brother's money which he left for his children?