callmerose
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 918
- Points
- 0
. are you Dr. Murray?
Indranee, that same question has been in the back of my mind. I just hadn't gotten to the point of asking. Hmmm.
. are you Dr. Murray?
THANK YOU!uhh, excuse me, but Michael can throw money at whomever HE wants. he does not have the "hippocratic oath" governing HIS behavior.
he was in "pain". you profess to be a health practitioner. as such, you should know what sleeplessness can do to a person.
so stop already with the "let's blame Mike" bit. you're not fooling anyone. are you Dr. Murray?
uhh, excuse me, but Michael can throw money at whomever HE wants. he does not have the "hippocratic oath" governing HIS behavior.
he was in "pain". you profess to be a health practitioner. as such, you should know what sleeplessness can do to a person.
so stop already with the "let's blame Mike" bit. you're not fooling anyone. are you Dr. Murray?
Indranee, that same question has been in the back of my mind. I just hadn't gotten to the point of asking. Hmmm.
I don't know Ramona. I used to work in Flatbush Brooklyn and I saw someone stab someone else for a hefty bag of empty soda cans. Could not have been more than a dollar or two.
who knows if someone is paying him "under the table" and this is all just an act to look half innocent... though i must say he fails pretty bad.
Did you just go from advocating compassion for Murray to equating him to someone who would kill for a bag of soda cans?????
Since when is asking someone if they are Dr. Murray "character assassination"? The internet is anonymous so any poster could be Murray, or one of his cohorts, or a family member, or a colleague, or a friend. We just don't know.Please, no character assassination here. You can disagree with someone's opinion without making fun of them. You would not want people doing that to you, so you should extent the same respect to others.
Since when is asking someone if they are Dr. Murray "character assassination"? The internet is anonymous so any poster could be Murray, or one of his cohorts, or a family member, or a colleague, or a friend. We just don't know.
It was a legitimate question, given the things that've been said here.
I get what you're saying Ramona, because I was right there with you in your opinion that it was out of line to blame Kenny and everyone else involved with the show for "killing" Michael. In that case I do believe the accusatory questions towards Kenny, et al. were inappropriate because they pointed a finger of guilt. But here we have ample reason to question the poster, because he/she seems to do nothing but defend Murray, even though Murray ADMITTED giving Michael the fatal dose of propofol.
WHY is Murray still being defended by some people???
I think what I said about the soda cans was misunderstood so let me explain. We were discussing what people will do for money. We were discussing that Murray was being paid 150,000.00 a month to work for Michael (I assume that is the amount that was stated so lets just say thats what he was supposed to have been paid or whatever).
I stated that I had seen a man stabbed for a bag of empty soda cans They are worth a nickel each (five cents) and there was a black plastic bag full of them. So, my point was simply that people do senseless things for money was all. It was not a defense against Murray, but a simple statement meaning that desperate people do desperate things.
It is now known that Murray needed money. I question his motives as well as the next guy. I don't know what this man was thinking or the kind of stress he was uinder in his life. I think he thought he was going to make a lot of money and didn't think things through very well past that. I did not in any way mean to defend his actions, but state a reason for doing this job for the stated amount
Since when is asking someone if they are Dr. Murray "character assassination"? .
But the prosecution has a very compelling and winnable case against Murray:
1) ACUTE intoxication of Propofol, which means there was malice to kill MJ, or gross negligence
2) Organs were healthy - not indicative of any addictive abuse.
So the Jacksons can talk all they want. The DA has the coroner's report which has the real evidence.
What stories have you heard from Dr Murray exactly? He hasn't spoken openly about this to anyone but the police right after this whole thing happened. I think the press keeps changing the story but this man has said nothing.
If we fans really should understand one thing and one thing only is that the press paints the story they want us to see. It is not always the truth.
I'm not saying he isn't guilty, but he has not said anything about the case.
Also if Mike wanted Murray to be his Doc. SOOOO bad, like people are claiming, don't you think he would have signed that contract already? So Murray would begin to get paid? And why didn't AEG do a background check on him? they would have found out that he already killed someone. AEG was the one paying him, not Mike.
If I had been making the rationalizations for Murray that Beachlover has, then the question wouldn't surprise me, especially on a Michael Jackson fan site.I would consider it character assassination if someone thought that I was Conrad Murray.
But I asked the same queston, so I am guilty too!
I do understand the psychology behind it. It gives us back a sense of "control" when we live in a world where a lot of things are just out of our control. And in this situation, (to be more specific,) Michael did play a role, BUT he was relying on the expertise of his doctor, an assumed professional, and that is where Michael went wrong. He trusted an unscrupulous "doctor".From what I had experience, there is a mentality among some people who always feels that the victim played some part in their own destruction.
If a woman get rapes, they always asked; what time was she out, what was she wearing, why wasn't she in populated areas, and so on. Because if any of the above happen, then the girl helped bring this on themselves and should had known better.
If a person in some random shooting gets killed they asked; what time were they out, what were they doing, who was with them, and so on. If they find out that the person in question was out at 12am with some of his friends on the street corner, people would say he brought this on themselves because they should had been inside.
This line of thinking is called Just World Syndrome. It is when the victim is at fault for what happen to them, despite the cruelty of the crime. It makes the person feel that the same thing can never happen to them because they do not live that lifestyle. So if something bad happen, it must be that person's fault.
Which is why some people blame Michael for his own death because he put himself in that situation and it makes them feel better that it would never happen to them.
My pleasure. Just always remember when seeking 'the truth' you have to be very careful because it is very hard when we see something we want to see and take that as fact and then ignore what we don't want to hear. No matter, the truth is the truth and thats always best to stick to.