Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate
How much of a chance does Robson have of winning that civil lawsuit? How is he going to prove Michael's companies had liability for him to be sexually abuse?
If this nonsense goes to trial the only question on the jury's mind will be whether MJ was a child molester or not.
There is tons of evidence of his innocence including the fact that Robson wasn't even in Neverland between Feb 5-Feb 10 when he now claims he was being abused there.
He contradicts not only his own but his sister's and mother's testimonies too for example he claims now that he was first abused the second night he was in Neverland when his sister didn't sleep in
bed with him and MJ. But his sister said the opposite in 2005 that it was the first night she didn't sleep in MJ's bed and the second night she did sleep there.
So how could any abuse take place when a witness was sleeping in the same bed??
Moreover his sister made it clear in 2005 that they didn't plan it they simply fell asleep on his bed.
Since Robson also claims that
1. MJ had the alarm in the hallway to prevent anyone seeing the abuse
2. it was an unwritten rule that nobody should enter his room while he there with him
he should explain how is it that MJ considered a potential witness in the hallway a problem but not a witness in the same bed!
He also lies about nobody coming in the room while he was there with MJ. His sister and his mother both testified (just like Marie and Karlee Barnes and Mac Culkin and June Chandler)
that they could go in his room at any time of the day whenever they wanted and in fact they did spend the night in his bedroom multiple times.
None of them ever talked about any kind of do not disturb signs on the door -- and it would be stupid for a real molester to put up such a sign anyway only to make himself more suspect.
Robson also claims now that he slept in bed with MJ in the Westwood apartment alone when in reality there wasn't even a bed in that apartment at all!
Just sleeping bags, one person sleeping bags and his mother testified that she and Chantal also slept on the floor with MJ.
He also left out from this complain how and why he and Chantal ended up in MJ's room in the first place.
While he suggests now that it was MJ who invited them in in reality Chantal and Wade asked their parents whether they can stay with Michael.
His mother and his sister both made that clear during their testimonies.
All these and many other details would be shows during a trial, unless the lawyers are idiots not to mention the countless interviews where Robson, his sister and mother
consistently and spontaneously defended MJ. Each and every such occasion would be put on screen and Robson would be asked:
did you understand that you were sexually abused when you said those thing?
If he says yes he would contradict everything he has recently claimed.
If he says no he would insult everyone's intelligence.
The fact that he lied about not knowing about the Estate is also a giant red flag because it clearly proves that he was desperate to get around the SOL
and you don't do that unless you want money -- while he claimed that he is not doing this for money.
And the list goes on. There's just so much bullshit in Robson's story that he could be easily defeated in court assuming that the jury is objective and and not full of idiots
or have scumbags like the 2005 jury where two wanted to profit from a guilty verdict. Fortunately 9 jurors put them in their place.
