Dan Reed has never claimed Robson was butt-raped on a regular basis. Dan Reed of course is a weasel, he alternates between the boys being in love with MJ to explain why the boys never said anything, why they took so long to disclose the alleged abuse etc. Then Reed sometimes goes on the attack with "Michael Jackson raped those kids", like it was a violent assault. Reed just uses what is most convenient for him at the time.
Of course its statuatory rape to have sex with a child, regardless if its soft, gentle and consensual sex, but thats not how Reed is spinning it sometimes, it sounds as if MJ physically forced himself on the boys etc.
---
Note: Robson did not change his story in Leaving Neverland to reduce questions about whether he had been abused 100 of times - because Leaving Neverland was already finished and screened when Robson and Safechuck FIRST claimed they were "abused 100s of times". They made that statement after the broadcast of Leaving Neverland.
To prevent further confusion, you can always read the court transcripts from the Robson allegations, in case you have not already done it.
Btw, just to be clear: I do know all about Guiterrez and what happened in 1993 inside out. But you still have to discredit the story presented by the crooks, since there are experts saying these kind of boy/adult relationships do exist, even if rare etc.
I just want to make sure the fans chooses a higher ground and stick to only facts. We already made the mistake of spreading false stories about Safechuck saying it was one way glass in the rooms for disabled people in the film-theater at neverland, and that Safechuck spent the "honeymoon" at disneyland Paris before it existed - when he were with MJ at disneyland Florida. We must pay attention to the details and dont sink to the lows of the opposing side.
uke: