victorytour84
Proud Member
Re: Do You Believe Breaking News is an authentic MJ track
Not MJ!
Not MJ!
Ah, the conspiracy theorists saved 'the big guns' until the end!
We can't argue with someone as 'reliable' as La Toya can we!?
It's bloody laughable it really is. The evidence against MJ singing on this song is offered by;
An unreliable sister.
Some nephews who had a short career in the 1990's.
A bitter ex-employee of Sony.
Some fans who hate Sony and/or The Estate (and believe everything that supports their views.
That would all get laughed out of court when pitted real evidence!
"It doesn't sound like MJ to me" (says La Toya Jackson) just won't 'cut it' in court I'm afraid.
Sony KNOWS MJ is singing on this record - IT'S EVEN BEEN PROVED - and so do most people without a hearing problem. The only question open to debate is, how much is MJ? And my answer to that is, "enough for me".
Acapella sounds abit more like him??.........
Go listen Malachi songs on youtube and you'll have reason to believe it isn't MJ.Ok here's what I think; It's not a great track, like not one that hits you instantly. It might grow on me in time like TII did.
In regard to whether I think it's Michael or not, put it this way, had there been no hype beforehand about it not being him, I would have had no reason not to think it was him. But because there was hype, I listened to it more critically BUT I still can't honestly say that I don't think it's him. My boyfriend is also a long time fan and he said the same thing; he thinks it is him.
I wonder if people, because of the hype, were looking for it not to be him and are merely picking up on vocal changes, something that in all honesty happened with every new album anyway if you think about it.
One thing I would ask everyone to consider is what if 2000 Watts hadn't made Invincible and was released now? My feeling is everyone would jump up and down and swear blind it wasn't him, but as we know it was him maybe what we need to do is acknowledge he had an amazingly huge vocal range, and not think the worst unless it's proven.
I have texted this to a number of upset fans today (including some from here so sorry if you're reading the same thing again) and a couple of people are troubled by what seems to be being called "the name dropping" (he says his own name in the song) and that they think Michael wouldn't do that. The way I see it is it's not meant to look smug or egotistical, he's saying he's tired of people wanting a piece of "Michael Jackson" the name, the stage persona, the scandalous story and the money instead of wanting Michael the person, the good, kind hearted, loving human being. That's how I interpreted it anyway.
Thanks!oops sorry removed link
go to youtube type in accapella Breaking newas
Alright everyone, look...I think it might be Michael....here my points why I think so...
1. 2000 Watts and Shout don't sound like Michael, but they are, would you be doubting these songs if you never heard them?
2. Why would Sony Pay 250 Million Dollars and use fake vocals? Does that really make sense? People would find out, and they would lose not only a ton of money, but lose so much credibility as a company. Sony wants to make money, I'm trying to wonder why they would purposely try to lose it.
3. Michael recorded this in 2007..His voice was different as he got older IMO.
4. Michael could be singing in a different manner, maybe it was "Experimenting" in a way..but Michael had it in him to sing in many ways.
All this is very disturbing, the fact they would release a song that would make us question the validity, puzzles me..I do hope things get sorted out soon..
If you are a real fan you will buy the album and that is it. If we fans don't buy the album who will??
It's clearly a fake, get real! Do you OWN any Michael Jackson records?
1. 2000 Watts and Shout sound as much like him as any others of his :mello:
3. Yet he got his normal voice back for TII?