Lainy
Proud Member
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here
Oh boy, it's too confusing! my brain is letting me down on this one. :scratch:
Oh boy, it's too confusing! my brain is letting me down on this one. :scratch:
I do not know if you were on last night, but Smooth gave us an update that his source at Sony said that there is another voice on the song, and that sony was meeting today to investigate this. That is why we now know that the song is not 100% Michael. LTD is RIGHT. He was saying this all along, but was asleep last night when the information came out. Many need to read back some posts and you will find this. There has been some developments in this drama. Smooth has always given us good information in the past, so I am going to go with him.
According to Smooth now these tracks will be left off. Also there was only going to be 2 to 3 instead of 5 , but i would not mind hearing these if only Michael, maybe even just a demo as bonus material.
Who is to say that Smooth's insider is right? At the end of the day I think the guy is reliable but I take what insiders say with a pinch of salt.I'm the kind of person who needs proof before I will believe gossip, statements etc. My opinion is that & always has been that Michael just features on the track but will keep an open mind to other possibilities.
My point to my previous post to you was that basically you were saying if people believed that it was just Michael on the track, then they were insulting him, which I thought was harsh.There has been a lot of statements on this board against those who believe it's Michael on the track, if they think he is just part of the song or wholly on the track.Words like stupid, or saying you must be blind etc. Or saying you are not a real fan or you are insulting him/his legacy etc. etc. Just because they don't share the same opinion!
Not everyone in life will agree with you or your opinion. You will have a hard time in life if you always think you are right & insult those who think differently than yourself!
Anyway, hopefully the controversy will soon pass & we can look forward to the new album again.
Peace & love to you!
Like I said earlier in this thread...
Many fans need time to realize Michael wanted to sound differently on this record. That's all and it's not even sth new for MJ. He did not only change his appearance throughout the years (you can't simply ignore this), he also changed his vocal abilities and style from album to album and each time his voice and the way he sung has changed.
Did you hear "This Is It"? Haven't you noticed it sounds like nothing on THRILLER or BAD, but it has been recorded BETWEEN these two albums.
Did you hear "One More Chance"? Back in 2003 many fans first thought it was a completely new song from 2003, HOWEVER it was recorded during the INVINCIBLE recording sessions. His voice however sounded completely different on this recording when compared to other tracks on INVINCIBLE.
Can you remember the release of "We've Had Enough" in 2004? Again some fans thought it was new song from 2004, HOWEVER it was actually recorded in 1999 and post-production took place in 2000. It was even the FIRST collaboration with Rodney Jerkins. Yeah, even before they recorded "You Rock My World".
Did you really expect a 2007 track by MJ with the same INVINCIBLE-era voice, style and pronunciation.
Guys, this is a STUDIO recording with a new production and some new effects on his voice to polish it.
Michael can't sing LIVE like that. He could not even sing "You Rock My World" LIVE the way he did it on the album INVINCIBLE (just take a look at the MSG concerts from September 2001).
But some of you seem to ignore this.
This is a modern production and that's why it's just a teaser to the album. The first single will be a different song, to be premiered soon.
Welcome back to reality. Stop arguing with other fans please and also please stop these ridiculous "Sony is phony. Let's boycott the new album"-projects. How embarrasing is this...
What's wrong with those fans? Can't they accept even Michael liked new ideas and techniques sometimes?
Korgnex, again someone I respect very much. And I know what you're saying. But we can't ignore how these tracks came about. We can't ignore Tarryl's comments about destroyed hard drives and files. Malachi has gone missing. There's something shaddy going on.
All of those facts came AFTER we all already recognized with our own judgement that these tracks were fraud.
Right now it's Sony/The Estate's word VS. us, the family, common sense.
You talk about MJ changing his style. As different as his eras are, NEVER ONCE have we questioned the authenticity of a Michael Jackson track. Not once.
You mean i've been arguing my point all this time when Smooth gave an update stating that last night?
How has this been missed?
That is Smooth's post from last night. Keep in mind he has been right about the album so far.
Korgnex, again someone I respect very much. And I know what you're saying. But we can't ignore how these tracks came about. We can't ignore Tarryl's comments about destroyed hard drives and files. Malachi has gone missing. There's something shaddy going on.
All of those facts came AFTER we all already recognized with our own judgement that these tracks were fraud.
Right now it's Sony/The Estate's word VS. us, the family, common sense.
You talk about MJ changing his style. As different as his eras are, NEVER ONCE have we questioned the authenticity of a Michael Jackson track. Not once.
Who is to say that Smooth's insider is right? At the end of the day I think the guy is reliable but I take what insiders say with a pinch of salt.I'm the kind of person who needs proof before I will believe gossip, statements etc. My opinion is that & always has been that Michael just features on the track but will keep an open mind to other possibilities.
My point to my previous post to you was that basically you were saying if people believed that it was just Michael on the track, then they were insulting him, which I thought was harsh.There has been a lot of statements on this board against those who believe it's Michael on the track, if they think he is just part of the song or wholly on the track.Words like stupid, or saying you must be blind etc. Or saying you are not a real fan or you are insulting him/his legacy etc. etc. Just because they don't share the same opinion!
Not everyone in life will agree with you or your opinion. You will have a hard time in life if you always think you are right & insult those who think differently than yourself!
Anyway, hopefully the controversy will soon pass & we can look forward to the new album again.
Peace & love to you!
I take it some of you will be boycotting sales of all Michael's albums that contain vocals that are not 100% his? i.e - 'Off The Wall', 'Thriller', 'Bad', 'Dangerous' etc? After all, other people sang vocals/backing vocals on these albums. If you're obsessed that everything has to be 100% MJ, then you better burn all your albums.
YOU ARE HELPING DESTROY MICHAEL'S LEGACY - NOTHING GOOD WILL COME OF THIS!
If you get your wish, and this album is a flop, there will never be another album release with new material. Sony will give up on promoting Michael's Legacy, sales o his old album will flop, and he will, eventually, be forgotten for the genius he was. IS THAT REALLY WHAT YOU WANT - JUST TO HURT SONY?
You fools do not realise what you are doing, and I will be so sad to see Michael's Legacy destroyed - but the dogs must have their pound of flesh I suppose.
You try and destroy Sony with your hatred, and you will destroy Michael's Legacy - MARK MY WORDS!
I have never known ANY posthumous release by ANY artist where it was considered acceptable to hire phonies to fabricate their voice.
A different version!?!? Seriously listen yourselves digging for every last detail. This is getting daft now.
This whole issue could be resolved if Sony released the original track as it was delivered. But is it even worth it? Wouldn't it be easier to just pull the questionable tracks? "Breaking News" isn't even that good.
Can we collate a list of who has given their opinion?
So far, the following have said it's not Michael:
Taj Jackson
Taryll Jackson
TJ Jackson
Latoya Jackson
Jonathan Moffett
Rodney "Darkchild" Jerkins
Who else?
LOL, same here. I even listened to LNFSG today and enjoyed his sweet, beautiful voice
Chucky Kaplow (TII dancer). He hasn't said it isn't MJ but he said "I just listened to "Breaking News" once more and I take back what I said earlier. It's not a total mess. It's worse... Whoever got Michael to do the backing vocals on their new single is my hero!" on his Facebook page.
Hi, you are mixing me up with someone else. You did not respond to me, but to LTD. I saw what you wrote to LTD and then sent this message that you quoted above. Therefore, Petrarose,did not comment about peoples opinions. Don't forget to put the right username when you say "you." Love you, Me.
Chucky Kaplow (TII dancer). He hasn't said it isn't MJ but he said "I just listened to "Breaking News" once more and I take back what I said earlier. It's not a total mess. It's worse... Whoever got Michael to do the backing vocals on their new single is my hero!" on his Facebook page.
Has he?
I recall a post from Smooth where he said his source had heard the song and it was incredible, never any doubt of Michael then.