They should really go easy with that crown thing. It's kind of corny and it start to feel desperate. Finger crossed for the release.
LOL...I was just thinking the same thing...
Please don't try to tell me what I am looking at. I am imagining the logo in different settings. I don't like the gray. It is unattractive. Yes, it will look better on some backgrounds as opposed to others, but IMO, even on the gray background it looks better but still not good.
I also don't need a lecture or reiteration of how many versions they have. I am stating an opinion based on the one I see. My opinion is not finite just as the product as of now is not finite. Nor will an unattractive logo prevent me from buying the product. It is a conversation stating what I feel. I don't have to try to be convinced to like it when I don't. (Not all of this is meant for you but is a general statement for everyone who thinks everybody should like what is put out and if they don't they shouldn't speak about it here.)
I just hate how sometimes it feels like we have to have a consensus around here and if you don't fit into that consensus, you can't have a voice.
Anyway, I don't want to make this thread about what I don't like so I will leave this as is.
Ehehe, but a huge picture of a facepalm is OK? Seriously, Ivy....was this tone really needed for my neutral and brief informational post?
and I'm okay with people not sharing the consensus opinion. It's just the tone that bothers me such as seeing posts with "dog shit" or seeing replies with unfriendly tone. It's unneeded in my book.
He sure was KING of that BAD tour!! In 1988 I saw Michael in Kansas City and Chicago and there are no words to describe what that was like. They simply must release this so people can see that 25 years later nobody can even come close to Michael Jackson.I like the crown - I think Michael is a BAD Ass King .. kicking butt, The King slayed in BAD concerts and took no prisoners.
Royalty can be BAD ass too... Its just shows WHO's BAD and WHO'S KING. There is bad and then there is KING OF BAD !
If we don't get a second leg BAD Tour concert this year then that will ruin BAD25 for me.
There's.nothing wrong with having Will or kanye or anybody else on the remix. The trouble with t25 was the remixes weren't good. hell, they don't even need to be remixes, just great re interpretations featuring hot artists would be good.anything that impacts radio and the singles chart will benefit the legacy in some way.But, PLEASE no will.i.am or Kanye or Fergie mixes. PLEASE. Oh and if the estate is reading this, can I have access to all of MJs work? (Worth a try )
There's.nothing wrong with having Will or kanye or anybody else on the remix. The trouble with t25 was the remixes weren't good. hell, they don't even need to be remixes, just great re interpretations featuring hot artists would be good.anything that impacts radio and the singles chart will benefit the legacy in some way.
I'm just making this up but what would you prefer?
1. 5 unreleased songs from the Bad sessions. (The album doesn't go to #1).
2. 1 unreleased song from the Bad sessions and 4 remixes of songs in the Bad album with artists: Justin Bieber, Adele, Katy Perry and Kanye West. (The album goes to #1 and the remixes chart in the top 10 singles chart).
In my opinion, number ones are not everything.
Link..?Someone put this on twitter, please god no.
I have been informed that Epic is commissioning remixes for BAD 25th anniversary album. They're soon going to open Westlake studios where the BAD original sessions are stored and all remixers will go work there. This way they will prevent leaks of the tracks on the Web