Latest on MJJC

Autopsy Results 'Indefinitely Delayed'

I heard rumours that someone stole his brains... But I dont believe that can be true, how could it be!?
 
wow um...they didn't steal his brain. they'retesting it to see the extent of drugs in his life. the brain can tell if the person has every overdosed, how many times, and how much or little they've used a certain drug.
 
marjieN said:
imho.......the net is widenng.

According to the chef, the doctor didn't come down @10am for breakfast as he usually did. To me it is obviously because Michael was already dead and Murray spent the next 2 hours in a panic trying to figure out what the hell to do about it...thus he called for Prince as a witness to his botched up CPR, turned the heat up.......conveniently forgot the address so he couldn't make 911 call etc..........

Meanwhile all this happens just a week or so before Michael was due to arrive in London for his concerts........and just after AEG had on tape a "brilliant" rehersal that they could release on DVD.............

.........more evidence needed?................
Click to expand...

prince wasnt a witness he didnt go upstairs according to the chef. i do find the whole timeline thing strange. been going through it in my head. if the two women who went to the lockup did cause murray rang them that means for at least 3 hrs murray knew mj was gone. did staff hear ppl walking about upstairs during that time? is the house so big u couldnt tell. what the heck was he doing for 3 hours.thats pretty creapy.im kinda finding that hard to believe that he was upstairs for hours b4 putting the show on of running to get help. or did the women have nothing to do with what was happening to mj. so then u have the idea of murray falling alseep and not waking up till say 11am (as he didnt come down to get breakfast for mj around 10 as normal) found mj and realised he had been gone for hours and knew the autopsy would give a time so comes up with the whole waiting for 30 mins b.s just to add abit of time on interms of the time mj was gone.

but then he messes up by saying he had a pulse and changing his story.was this done cause mj died cause murray left the room so he needed to make it look like he was gone for 2 mins and then found mj like that cause if he gave mj the diprovan at 1am approx yet then finds him at 12 with a slight pulse its a big coincidence that something only happened to mj just b4 he was due to awaken after being under for 10 hours.and his doesnt come down for normal to get mjs breakfast cause he was asleep
 
For fans who have raised questions about Michael keeping all this secret, he did not. Mesereau brought it up in the trial and anyone who took the time to examine would know that Michael took prescriptions for various ailments



Q. Now, the prosecutor asked you questions
about Mr. Jackson appearing intoxicated, okay?
A. Right.
Q. Now, you never saw him drinking, right?
A. No, I didn’t.
Q. And were you aware that there were times
when he had a prescription drug problem?
A. Yes, I -- yes, I was.
Q. And he had gotten a lot of injections from
various physicians?
A. That is correct, yes.
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; foundation.
THE COURT: Sustained.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Did you know Michael
Jackson had -- excuse me, let me rephrase. Did you
know whether or not Mr. Jackson at various times had
a prescription drug problem?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. And did you know he was treated for that?
A. Yes.
Q. When you saw him appearing intoxicated, you
don’t know what the cause was, correct?
A. That is correct, yes.
Q. You knew he had suffered severe burns on his
body, didn’t you?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Foundation;
relevance.
THE COURT: Foundation; sustained.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Did you know whether or
not, during one entertainment event, Mr. Jackson
suffered severe burns all over his body?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Ob -- I’ll --
THE WITNESS: Yes.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Did you know he was being
treated for that?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; vague as to
time.
THE COURT: Sustained.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Did you know whether or
not Mr. Jackson was being treated by physicians with
medication because he’d been badly burned?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; vague as to
time.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: At any time?
A. Yes.
Q. That was common knowledge at Neverland, was
it not?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: I’ll object and move to
strike the last answer. Still vague as to time.
THE COURT: Stricken.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: During the year 2002, were
you aware -- excuse me. During the year 2002, do
you know whether or not Michael Jackson was being
treated by various physicians for health problems?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection. Vague as to
"health problems."
THE COURT: Overruled.
You may answer.
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: I’ll object as to
foundation.
THE COURT: The answer -- the question calls
for a "yes" or "no" answer. You may answer.
THE WITNESS: Yes.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: And during the year 2002,
were you aware that Mr. Jackson --
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection to the form of
the question. "Were you aware" assumes facts.
THE COURT: You have to let him finish the
question.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: During the year 2002, were
you aware -- excuse me. During the year 2002, did
you know whether or not Mr. Jackson was taking
medications for a broken leg?
A. Yes.
Q. During the year 2002, did you know whether
or not Mr. Jackson was taking medications for a foot
problem?
A. Yes.
Q. And during the year 2002, did you know
whether or not Mr. Jackson had recurring problems
because he had been badly burned?
A. Yes.
Q. During the year 2002, did you know whether
or not Mr. Jackson had back problems?
A. Yes.
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: I’m going to object as to
foundation.
THE COURT: Sustained.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: During the year 2003, did
you know whether or not Mr. Jackson was taking
prescription drugs for a leg problem?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; foundation.
THE COURT: Sustained.
Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you know whether or not
Mr. Jackson took prescription drugs in the year 2003
while you were working there?
MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Objection; foundation.
THE COURT: Overruled.
THE WITNESS: Yes.
Click to expand...
 
Soso Deaf said:
wow um...they didn't steal his brain. they'retesting it to see the extent of drugs in his life. the brain can tell if the person has every overdosed, how many times, and how much or little they've used a certain drug.
Click to expand...

No, I mean I know that, but I heard rumours someone stole his brains from those investigators..?
 
iv read that michael was wearing a nose prosthesis .. ;S i don't know if its true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top