Dr.Feelgood
Proud Member
BAHAHAHAHA! Kid Rock = BEST MALE ARTIST! Ain't that funny? _Michael Jackson is hooking up with Pamela Anderson and Kid Rock receives an award for BEST MALE ARTIST.
Mike didn't deserve to win, unfortunately. It was just a remix album anyway, as another member put it.
Based on sales it would've won. But since Thriller 25 hasn't got no genuine new material, they'd rather give the award to someone who has. And Kid Rock certainly recorded new vocals and had a good sales amount.
Makes sense if you ask me.
Mike didn't deserve to win, unfortunately. It was just a remix album anyway, as another member put it.
/QUOTE]
Some of you really mean Kid Rock did deserve it? There are only a few people in the world who deserve to be named as an artist, and Kid Rock is not included. Also, except his first single we heard nothing about Kid's album.
Well, he is constantly high, he'll not enjoy his victory that long.
I always read something like "Michael does not deserve it", still nobody conquered him for almost 26 years, so, who else does deserve it? Michael simply sold more and you say he does not deserve a plain award?Where is your pride, your dignity?
You say (not you, Pinguin) there is a difference between Janet's and Michael's fans. But I don't think so. There is a difference between Jackson fans and other fans. Think about the EMA's and VMA's: Britney fans do not care if she doesn't perform, if she does not sing, if she does anything. They just want her to get as much awards as possible.
Same with Rick Astley (nothing against him): Would the fans say no, he does not deserve it, just because it was quiet around him for 13 years? No, they smiled and said : let's get him an award.
You say MJ (who is one of the less who works) does nothing . You say he, Michael, does not deserve it, while watching people win who do not deserve it.
During the year of 2008, there were no new vocal recordings done by Michael Jackson himself. What made Thriller 25 popular? Might have been the re-released original tracks, but they cannot be classified as "new" songs nor material.
What material on Thriller 25 could we classify as "new"?
1) Remixes done by other artists (Kanye West, Fergie, Will.i.am, Akon)
2) One previously unreleased single (recording date unknown): "For all time" by Michael Jackson himself.
Looking at the above, it's shouldn't be a hard task seeing that the majority of material on Thriller 25 isn't new. What we can consider as "new" isn't even recorded by Michael Jackson.
Assuming that they (the WMAs) were looking for the best male artist by new vocal records including sales count, I think they've done the right thing not to pick Mike.
Whether it was the right decision to pick Kid Rock, I don't know. But I don't think that with the amount of work and new material MJ put into Thriller 25 himself, that he deserves the award for best male artist of 2008.
As far as I know, all recordings on Kid Rocks album are new. Nothing re-released nor remixed by other artists.
And of course, I do agree that if you look at their careers as a whole we all know (including the WMAs) who the best male artist is. And I'm more than positive that MJ will be picking up some awards when his new album comes out.
Mike didn't deserve to win, unfortunately. It was just a remix album anyway, as another member put it.
/QUOTE]
Some of you really mean Kid Rock did deserve it? There are only a few people in the world who deserve to be named as an artist, and Kid Rock is not included. Also, except his first single we heard nothing about Kid's album.
Well, he is constantly high, he'll not enjoy his victory that long.
I always read something like "Michael does not deserve it", still nobody conquered him for almost 26 years, so, who else does deserve it? Michael simply sold more and you say he does not deserve a plain award?Where is your pride, your dignity?
You say (not you, Pinguin) there is a difference between Janet's and Michael's fans. But I don't think so. There is a difference between Jackson fans and other fans. Think about the EMA's and VMA's: Britney fans do not care if she doesn't perform, if she does not sing, if she does anything. They just want her to get as much awards as possible.
Same with Rick Astley (nothing against him): Would the fans say no, he does not deserve it, just because it was quiet around him for 13 years? No, they smiled and said : let's get him an award.
You say MJ (who is one of the less who works) does nothing . You say he, Michael, does not deserve it, while watching people win who do not deserve it.
Get over yourself! Kid Rock is talented, he is just not as talented as Michael Jackson. So what, Kid deserved to win this award. The reason you haven't heard anything about Kid's album is because you don't spend everyday o n a fan forum seeking out any tidbit of news possible as you do with MJ.
Where is my pride and dignity? In accepting the fact that Michael isn't a God and other artists (yes Kid is an artist) are capable of impacting the music scene besides MJ. Isn't it ironic and hypocritical that you complain about other fans that just want to see their artist get awards, but when Michael doesn't win his you freak out. Get over yourself…
Michael did not win EMA 2008 too -.- TokioHotel won bleeeh