144000
Proud Member
it is assumed that he didn't destroy his works, because he wanted someone else to take over writing them.
the safer assumption is that he didn't destroy his works because he was always writing and he wanted sojmething to come back to, to work on. while he may have feared for his life, he lived in the moment. he said he was always writing. if there's nothing left..what's there to write?
the safer assumption is that he didn't destroy his works because he was always writing and he wanted sojmething to come back to, to work on. while he may have feared for his life, he lived in the moment. he said he was always writing. if there's nothing left..what's there to write?