With as INCREDIBLE as he has been (making up stuff about Mike being sick, posthumous releases, etc.), you would think they would have written this guy off by now! Why do they give this guy room to speak?
Don't have to be accurate at least some of the time to be deemed a credible source????
uke:
I guess not when it comes to MJ.
yep...you answered your own question.
by the way, the media's 'clever' way of saying they report everything is to report in one outlet, something that they don't want spreading like wildfire. and they make sure it's verified, if they like the subject of their report. we've been discussing in other threads how the media likes other music acts better than they like MJ. well...i found out in a free los angeles magazine/paper that one of the members of U2 has started a development on a land. and that development flies in the face of U2's message on environmentalism. the guitarist, the Edge is planning to deface a mountain, as part of that project. he's building homes for himself, and obstructing natural views in the process. when the magazine went to him for a comment, he could not be reached. now here is the kicker...despite all of that, the magazine starts their article by calling the group 'the Supergroup, U2'. right there you know the paper has the group's back. never, once does the magazine editor add to the commentary of disgruntled neighbors of the Edge, over here in cali. the neigbors are mad, but the writer of the article makes no disparaging comments about any of the members of the group. the mag acts totally professional..except for the glowing opinion of the group (supergroup).
now, if this were Michael...the mag would start with that five letter term, and participate with the neighbors, in the disparaging commentary. they certainly would not call him the King of Pop, and if they did, they wouldn't do it without quotation marks around the title. U2 is very big, but that's not enough for the mag to attack them.
So..Michael was right...the bigger the star, the bigger the target.
whether they know it or not, they backhandedly say MJ is the biggest artist in the world, by attacking him the most. and they show their envy. because if it wasn't for me, you wouldn't know about this U2 report. it's proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Edge is doing this project. but the Sun is all it takes for PETA to launch against Michael. and you don't need me to find out about it, because it's not limited to one media source, that is hidden somewhere here in los angeles. by the way, the paper i am talking about is called The L.A. Weekly. and they are a BIGGGG proponent of the environment.
