Vanity-Fair: MJ`s Family: Inside Their Desperate Attempt to Oust Estate Executors

"I'm fighting back because these are outright blatant lies, and I want people to know the truth. I'm taking action towards everyone involved," La Toya told the Daily News as she walked a "pink" carpet with Michael's three kids at the launch of the new Mr. Pink ginseng energy drink.


OH PLEASE!

She sounds just like her brother Randy, with his "THIS IS NOT OVER" line.

But before she tackles this problem (LOL), I'm still waiting for her to reveal why she (and some other family members) continued to call Murray the "fall guy." She was all hot and heavy with her so-called investigation, well what happened, what was the conclusion and where is all of the "fall guy" evidence?

Vanity Fair didn't back down from Janet, they certainly are not going to back down for a nobody like Miss LaToya, in my opinion.

That being said, I wish she would sue, so Vanity Fair could get her behind in the HOT SEAT. Hot Seat = Being Deposed Under Oath. Now that I would love to see.
 
]La Toya claims that contrary to reporting in the high-profile piece, she never “demanded" access to the King of Pop’s rented estate in the hours after his death or stuffed valuables into black plastic garbage bags purportedly removed the next morning by van.

She may have never "demanded" access, but she did go there rooting for something to take. It is just a choice of words, Sullivan could have used word "ordered" instead of "demanded". Her purpose there left nothing to imagination, it was to find anything valuable.

"I'm fighting back because these are outright blatant lies, and I want people to know the truth. I'm taking action towards everyone involved," La Toya told the Daily News as she walked a "pink" carpet with Michael's three kids at the launch of the new Mr. Pink ginseng energy drink.

LaToya is fighting against windmills in this. She put herself in that position, by giving interviews right outside of the Michael's house and other paid interviews.

The article’s “reckless and irresponsible” allegations “resulted in our clients’ reputations being trashed in the international media,” lawyer Stephen Moeller wrote in the letter obtained by The News.

Could LaToya's reputation be tarnished any more than it was already tarnished?



http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/la-toya-retraction-vanity-fair-article-1.1181352[/FONT][/COLOR][/QUOTE]
 
Latoya is mental. She did steal from her brother. The threat to sue is just to scare the media and change the minds of the public. Too late for her. What goes around, surely comes around. Like I said earlier, hope the Estate investigates them for theft. They can't let them make away with Michael's valuables that he would want his children to have.

Sick of the Jacksons. Happy their cover has been blown though...
 
Latoya certainly had a good enough root around to find some old weed in a bag stuffed in a drawer which she helpfully offered up to the police as heroin. Oh and all those 'i hate branca' post it notes which unfortunately she turned over to er branca.

Randalll is completely and utterly wrong about janet though in holding up the funeral - i hope she does sue. It's all in court documents, in black and white, it's real easy to understand and took about 10mins to skim through. In mrs j's ex parte application to the court to pay funeral expenses on 31 aug, janet is just one of the payments that needs to be reimbursed. But the reason in making this emergency application (at a cost of $18k) is because the jacksons had just realised that forest lawn needed payment up front for the funeral to take place on sept 3rd - they were looking for around £800k. Mrs j's lawyers did say that if payment wasn't made, the funeral couldn't take place - but it was forest lawn who wanted the money before the funeral cd take place not janet, her $49k was just mentioned as just another item on the miscellaneous expenses that needed paying. Really sloppy work from randall - doesn't bode well for the rest of the book on mj.
 
she won't get the 40%. 40% is put aside to use what is needed to care for her.

Let me make it really clear. Imagine that Michael's assets is 100 Million. 40% means 40 Million. Katherine won't get 40 million. What would happen that 40 Million would be put to an account and Katherine would be paid whatever is necessary for her care and living conditions - let's say $50,000 a month or $600,000 a year. When she dies whatever is left from the 40 Million is going to go to Michael's kids.

Thanks for the clarification, Ivy. So KJ can get a maximum of 40% IF this is necessary for her 'care and living conditions' (which presumably it wouldn't be)? So the payments the Estate makes re house, security,food, lawyers, etc, are part of the 40% (or the 80%, if we add PPB %)? I am curious how the monthly stipends, for KJ and PPB, which are in addition to paid living expenses and care, are determined. Does KJ as Co-Guardian in charge of the stipend amounts need to present any accounting of the expenditures?

Just wondering. Thanks.
 
Bubs;3723933 said:
Vanity Fair has made correction of Janet part in their article:hysterical:

Michael Jackson’s burial was delayed due to wrangling between Janet Jackson and her brother’s estate, a detail revealed in a November Vanity Fair–exclusive excerpt of Untouchable, Randall Sullivan’s Michael Jackson biography, which will be published next month. According to Sullivan, Janet put up the $49,000* deposit at Forest Lawn to secure a spot for Michael but refused to let the funeral take place until the money was repaid.

* A previous version of this blog post reported that the amount of Janet Jackson's deposit was $40,000. Records released last week indicate that the amount was $49,000.

That made me :lmao:
I wonder if Janet's pr person is going to issue another statement and demand correction?

Ha! :toofunny:
 
Thanks for the clarification, Ivy. So KJ can get a maximum of 40% IF this is necessary for her 'care and living conditions' (which presumably it wouldn't be)? So the payments the Estate makes re house, security,food, lawyers, etc, are part of the 40% (or the 80%, if we add PPB %)? I am curious how the monthly stipends, for KJ and PPB, which are in addition to paid living expenses and care, are determined. Does KJ as Co-Guardian in charge of the stipend amounts need to present any accounting of the expenditures?

Just wondering. Thanks.

well we know that MJ Estate earned over $400 Million. Assuming there was no debt, and that half of it goes to taxes and expenses and we are left with $200 Million you'll see that Katherine doesn't need $80 Million dollars for her care. But yeah if necessary she can get it all such as how they gave her $6 Million to pay her debt to the Koreans.

As Estate currently in probate and still has the debts they aren't paying anyone the 40% or the 80%. Estate is not closed and the beneficiaries aren't paid yet. Estate is paying them allowances and covering their living costs. This actually doesn't make any difference. Katherine like I said isn't supposed to get all of the 40% and MJ's kids are supposed to be on an allowance until they are 21. So probate or not, debts or not, as of now what they are supposed to be paid now is only an allowance.

As for the expenses yes there's an accounting and a reason for the amount that she's being paid such as her expenses, salary of her assistant, accountant, lawyer, money given for clothing and cash spending money and so on.
 
They all should be grateful for what Michael has been provided for them. The ones not in the will should be grateful for what Michael did for them ALL HIS LIFE and respect what he wanted now.
 
Funny article about LaToya's sticky fingers:D

La Toya Jackson Stole From Michael Jackson’s Estate After Death, Vanity Fair Claims

Did sticky fingers La Toya Jackson loot from Michael Jackson’s house after he died? Vanity Fair seems to think so. I thought those Jackson men were crazy pants but these Jackson women are giving them a run for their Michael’s money!
Oh but not so fast says La Toya! According to TMZ, Michael’s sister is threatening to sue the magazine over allegations that she went to Michael’s Carolwood mansion shortly after his death and loaded plastic bags filled with cash into a duffel bag. La Toya is asking for a retraction because she thinks “the article describes her visit as a ‘mad scramble for money’ — strongly insinuating she stole large sums of cash from MJ’s house.”
That’s exactly what the story’s insinuating La Toya! And if I threw a boulder in the middle of Times Square I wouldn’t be able to hit someone who doesn’t believe it. The Vanity Fair except comes from the upcoming Michael Jackson biography written by author Randall Sullivan and currently titled Untouchable: The Strange Life and Tragic Death of Michael Jackson.
It states: “Grace Rwaramba [former nanny to MJ's kids] described Michael’s standard practice of hiding his cash in black plastic garbage bags and under the carpets. [The security guard] describes seeing La Toya and her boyfriend loading black plastic garbage bags into duffel bags and placing them in the garage. (La Toya would insist that nearly all of Michael’s money was gone by the time she arrived at the Holmby Hills house).”
So is La Toya saying she tried to steal money but nothing was there by the time she got there? Is that supposed to be any better? Oh you Jacksons! The skeletons never stay long in your closets. It was Janet Jackson last week and now it’s La Toya’s turn. Janet is threatening to sue over allegations from the same story that she delayed Michael’s official burial for three months until she got reimbursed for fronting the cash.
I know Janet’s always got off easy as the sane Jackson but after recent events I’m beginning to think otherwise. If I believe La Toya acted the fool over the money I have to assume Janet did the same. I know deaths bring out the worst in people but this is ridiculous! I’m super excited to read that story. If I know the Jacksons, these allegations are just the tip of the iceberg!
Do you think La Toya will sue or is she just bluffing? Do you believe La Toya stole from Michael?
http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/20...s-estate-after-death-vanity-fair-claims-1011/
 
sd that the title of the book? he couldnt be anymore tacky if he tried!
 
You will not see any lawsuits from Janet, Latoya or anyone else for that matter, anybody can issue a cease and desist notice.....the thing is are they willing to open themselves up to further scrutiny? 'cause that's what would happen if any lawsuit is launched. more damaging stuff could come out that they are'nt prepared for. So all this huff and puff is just for show.

So ironic, that so many more people are now seeing Janet for the true character she is.
 
I read the Oct 14, Article in Vanity Fair and was not impressed. Randal Sullivan's has written, ""A bandage covers his nose so cut away that, without a prosthetic, it looked like little more than a pair of slightly ridged nostrils." That is false and the autopsy never stated Micheal's nose was cut away. "The Publication date for Untouchable: The strange and tragic life of MJ is November 6th. Interestingly that is the same release date for Michael Bush's Book THE KING OF STYLE: Dressing Michael.
 
I read the Oct 14, Article in Vanity Fair and was not impressed. Randal Sullivan's has written, ""A bandage covers his nose so cut away that, without a prosthetic, it looked like little more than a pair of slightly ridged nostrils." That is false and the autopsy never stated Micheal's nose was cut away. "The Publication date for Untouchable: The strange and tragic life of MJ is November 6th. Interestingly that is the same release date for Michael Bush's Book THE KING OF STYLE: Dressing Michael.

He obviously didn't read autopsy report, but he is not the first author of book about Michael that has not being researched and it won't be the last one either.

Michael Bush's book is out Oct 30th.
Michael Bush, THE KING OF STYLE: Dressing Michael Jackson, which will be published by Insight Editions and available October 30, 2012.
 
Oh and all those 'i hate branca' post it notes which unfortunately she turned over to er branca.

Hold up i just noticed this now........she found "i hate branca notes" and actually gave those notes to mr branca....LMAO now that wasnt very smart now was it la toya :doh: :toofunny:
 
^^We can't believe anything this guy writes, if he writes this trash about Michael's nose. He has no evidence that LaToya gave Branca anything. He is just throwing out what he was told and what he made up, and since these people do not have to reveal a source they can say anything.

Really, is there nothing we can do about people who write lies? Even though I am not happy with Janet and company, I am hoping that in some way she can sue Vanity and this guy. She must have some proof about something that she can use.
 
His books sounds like a collection of national enquirer stories. Might aswell just ignore as frankly everything we have heard so far sounds about as belivable as the n.e.rather that than someone trying to act credible with a half decent book
 
True ^^, but so many curious fans like to buy such things. I guess they will be a significant number of the audience.
 
Randall Sullivan has another article this time in daily mail

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-fabulous-wealth-life-took-vanload-death.html


Curse of Michael's millions: How Michael Jackson's family preyed on his wealth and took it by the vanload after his death
New biography expose how the Jackson family used the King of Pop for his money
By RANDALL SULLIVAN

PUBLISHED: 17:00 EST, 10 November 2012 | UPDATED: 17:00 EST, 10 November 2012
Comments (3)
Share

In the late summer of 2001, Michael Jackson’s family were after him again. It was two days before his scheduled departure for New York, where his 30th Anniversary concerts were to be staged at Madison Square Garden.

Performers would include Destiny’s Child, Ray Charles and Whitney Houston, and friends Elizabeth Taylor and Marlon Brando had been recruited to deliver televised speeches.

Michael wanted his family in New York as well; his brothers to perform a medley of hits from their days as the Jackson 5, while his parents sat in special box seats. The Jacksons insisted that they should receive appearance fees and it was agreed that family members would get honorariums of $250,000, even those who would just be there to watch the show.


Pride and joy: Michael Jackson, pictured with his two oldest children Prince and Paris in 2001, was used by his family for money, something which continued after his death

Just days before the first concert, though, Jermaine Jackson read an article that said his brother would be making as much as $10 million from the two shows and convinced his parents that Michael should pay the three of them another $500,000 apiece.

Jermaine and his father Joe drew up a contract and, with mother Katherine in tow, chased Michael around California to try to get him to sign.

Michael took refuge for several days at the house of his friend Marc Schaffel, co-producer of the event, then made a dash north to Neverland Ranch. He and his two young children, four-year-old Prince and three-year-old Paris, had barely set foot inside the house when Joe, Katherine and Jermaine appeared at the gate.

Michael told the security guards to tell his family he wasn’t there. Joe Jackson, though, refused to budge. ‘I’m his father,’ Joe told the guards. ‘I need to use the bathroom. His mother needs to use the bathroom. Let us in.’

Frantic, Michael phoned Schaffel. If they got through the gate, his family would hound him to sign this contract, he explained. But he couldn’t keep his mother locked outside when she was pleading just to use the bathroom.

He told Schaffel he would instruct the guards to tell his family again that Mr Jackson was not on the premises, but to admit them so that they could use the facilities.

But as soon as Joe and Jermaine were through the gate, they drove to the main house and pushed their way inside. ‘They literally ransacked the place,’ Schaffel remembered.

Michael retreated with Prince and Paris to a hiding place concealed behind a secret door at the back of his bedroom closet and phoned Schaffel from there. He was in tears, literally whimpering into the phone.

Sisterly love: Michael Jackson, with sisters and Janet, right, and LaToya who allegedly ransacked his home for cash and valuables
‘You see what they do to me? Do you understand now why I don’t want anything to do with my brothers, why I hide from them and refuse to answer their phone calls?

‘I’ve supported my brothers, supported them all,’ Michael cried. ‘I’ve put their kids through school. But they still come after me, still wanting more. It never ends. And my father’s worse than they are.’

Michael choked up, Schaffel recalled, and then sobbed: ‘The worst part, the part that kills me, is that I have to lie to my own mother. Do you understand, Marc?’ Michael asked. ‘Do you understand now why I am the way I am? How else could I be?

For someone who so often professed his loneliness, Michael Jackson spent a remarkable amount of time avoiding people. He wore disguises, broke off relationships, and changed telephone numbers, but still paparazzi, delusional women, and desperate men pursued him. The saddest part, though, was that the people Michael took the greatest pains to elude were the members of his own family.

Guardian: The three Jackson children with their grandmother Katherine who has been giving money she received from her son to other members of the family

Until the time he found a way to live off his sons’ talent, his father Joe had worked the four-to-midnight shift as a crane operator amid the blast-furnace heat of the Inland Steel Mill, in Gary, Indiana. He earned barely enough to sustain the family home – a tiny aluminium-sided cube in which 11 people shared a bathroom.
Michael’s memories of early rehearsals all centred on the father/manager who bellowed at them constantly, smacking his sons or throwing them into walls if they made a mistake.
When the band signed to Motown, Michael was quickly singled out as the star. Jackie and Tito possessed only modest musical talent and Marlon had none at all. Jermaine had an adequate singing voice.
Such was Michael’s talent that just one year after signing with the label, the group delivered a debut record, I Want You Back, that shot to the top of the Billboard Hot 100.
In February 1970, the Jackson 5 released their second single, ABC. And with The Love You Save and I’ll Be There, they became the first group ever to send their first four releases to the top of the charts.
Between tours, Joe and his sons returned home to a five-bedroom, six-bathroom mansion in the Los Angeles enclave of Encino. There was an Olympic-size swimming pool, sports facilities, luxury cars and servants’ quarters.

Reunited: His brothers, including Jermaine, left, hounded Michael over fees for appearing at the King of Pop's 30th Anniversary shows in 2001
By the mid-Seventies, the Jackson 5 were in professional decline – in sharp contrast with Michael, the true star of the group.
His brothers had wanted to work on the Off The Wall album with him, but Michael refused, even when his mother attempted to convince him that he owed them. Released in 1979, it sold nearly seven million copies worldwide.
Then came the release of Thriller in December 1982, which turned him into, as Rolling Stone put it, ‘quite simply, the biggest star in the pop music universe’. Off The Wall had already made him wealthier than the rest of his family put together, now he would earn more than $200 million from sales of the Thriller album.
No longer his manager, his father was as calculating as ever. He knew that playing the boys against one another was a winning strategy. What a great idea it would be, he suggested to Jackie, Tito, Marlon, and Randy, to capitalise on the success of Thriller by including Michael in a ‘reunion tour’.

Michael resisted. He was tired of touring, he said, tired of all the attention, tired of travel and hotel rooms. Tired of his family, period.
The brothers first tried using guilt to sway him. Marlon was going through a divorce and couldn’t even make his mortgage payments. Maybe he should sell up and buy a smaller house, Michael suggested. The brothers then called a meeting at which they showed up with a life-size poster of Michael and told him they were going to put it onstage in his place. Michael wouldn’t relent. It was time to play their ace in the hole.

During a private meeting Katherine requested with Michael, she implored him to join his brothers on the tour. They needed the money, she told her son. Finally, when all else failed, she pulled out the big gun: ‘For me, Michael, please?’

Legacy: Michael Jackson, on stage during the Dangerous Tour, left his children everything

It was a choice between the only two things Michael had, his mother’s love and his career. He chose his mother’s love, of course.
At the first stop in Kansas City, Jermaine told a reporter: ‘Even though Michael is very talented, a lot of his success has been due to timing and a little bit of luck. It could have been him, or it could just as easily have been me.’

Michael distanced himself from his brothers as the tour progressed, refusing to stay on the same hotel floor with them. He insisted his attorneys be present at the business meetings that, within the first few dates, became the only conversations he had with his siblings. The other Jacksons insisted upon collecting their payments immediately after each show.

No one in his family, though, was prepared for the shout-out Michael gave on December 9, 1984: ‘This is our last and final show. It’s been a long 20 years and we love you all.’
Michael looked at the shocked expressions on his brothers’ faces and couldn’t suppress his smile.
Now established as one of the most famous families on the planet, life among the Jacksons was becoming a soap opera, and a sordid one at that. Michael was determined to distance himself.
The public humiliations seemed endless. In 1983, Jackie’s affair with Los Angeles Lakers cheerleader and future television talent-show judge Paula Abdul blew up his marriage. In March 1987, Jermaine showed up for Marlon’s birthday party carrying his three-month-old son by a woman named Margaret Maldonado, while his wife looked on with an expression of bewilderment.
During their divorce, Jermaine’s wife Hazel would allege that her husband had attempted to rape her.
By 1990, Michael had moved to Neverland, his personal amusement park in Santa Barbara County, California.
He made no comment when newspapers reported that Randy’s wife Eliza was accusing her husband of beating her throughout her pregnancy. The Jackson brothers were all just like Joe, Eliza told a reporter, except for Michael.
Though they depended on his money, usually dispensed through their mother Katherine, his siblings weren’t averse to criticising their brother in public.
Michael’s relationship with his sister La Toya was shattered in December 1993, when she responded to the Jordan Chandler scandal by holding a press conference in Tel Aviv, at which she declared her belief that the accusations against her brother were true.

Golden boy: It became clear early in their career that Michael was the one in The Jackson Five (left to right: Tito, Marlon, Jackie, Michael and Jermaine) who had true talent
‘I can’t remain silent,’ she squeaked into a bank of microphones. ‘I will not be a silent collaborator in his crimes against small, innocent children.’
[Jordan was a 13-year-old boy whom Michael has been accused of sexually molesting. The claims, which Jackson always denied, resulted in a payment of more than $18 million to the boy’s family. He would later describe the decision to make a deal with the Chandlers, his lawyer said, as ‘the worst mistake of his life’.]
In 2003, when Michael’s world was collapsing all around him, amid his arrest on further child molestation charges, of which he would be acquitted two years later, Jermaine had gone to New York publishers with a ‘tell-all’ book proposal.
The Jacksons viewed youngest brother Randy as the most conniving among them. He was a chip off the old block, far more like Joe than any of his brothers, visitors said – and that wasn’t intended as a compliment.
Joe Jackson had been hiding from creditors since 1987. He was living mostly on hand-outs from Katherine (who divvied up the $25,000 cheque Michael sent to her each month among needy family members) and was incessantly looking for opportunities to draw his most famous son into business deals.
THE JARFUL OF STICK-ON NOSES
In his closet at Neverland, Jackson kept a big jar of fake noses of various shapes and sizes, surrounded by tubes of stage glue.
‘He told me they were for disguises,’ recalled Adrian McManus, one of his staff at the ranch. At this point, Michael was disguising the result of at least six rhinoplasty operations: a pair of nostrils surrounded by a rim of shrivelled, shrunken, discoloured cartilage.
The singer had been a skilled make-up artist since his teens, and in 15 minutes at the mirror could create an appearance that fooled most people.
Plastic surgeons had been speculating on TV since as early as 1990 that the tip of his nose had been replaced by a prosthetic of either bone or plastic.
By about 2001, the way his nose changed from year to year, sometimes from week to week, had given him away.
But he managed to salvage something from this personal disaster: at least he could now have the nose he had always wanted – Bobby Driscoll’s. The most famous child star of the late Forties and early Fifties, Driscoll had for years been an icon of Jackson’s to rival Shirley Temple.
There is footage from 2002 of Jackson standing amid an enthralled crowd outside the Virgin Megastore in Times Square, New York, his Bobby Driscoll nose raised to the sky as if to declare: ‘I am Peter Pan.’
‘They all looked to Michael as an ATM machine,’ observed the Los Angeles attorney and radio host Leo Terrell.
Within hours of Michael’s death on June 25, 2009, the battle over the estate began. The King of Pop was going to be worth a billion dollars, maybe two billion, maybe more. The women of the clan initiated what became a week-long occupation and search of the Carolwood Drive chateau in Los Angeles where he died.
The first night, La Toya Jackson and her boyfriend Jeffre Phillips demanded to be admitted to the house. Three hours later, Katherine went inside after them.
It was mid-morning in London when Michael’s children’s former nanny Grace Rwaramba received a call from Katherine.
According to Rwaramba, Katherine began the conversation: ‘Grace, the children are crying. They are asking about you. They can’t believe that their father died. Grace, you remember Michael used to hide cash at the house? I’m here. Where can it be?’
But security guards said it was La Toya, along with her boyfriend, who loaded black rubbish bags filled with cash into duffel bags and placed them in the garage. La Toya would later insist that nearly all of Michael’s money was gone by the time she arrived at the house.
It did not become obvious that the Jacksons intended to remove whatever valuables were inside the house until the next morning, when Janet Jackson arrived at the front gate and demanded that it be opened to admit the moving van behind her.
A couple of hours later the van left with La Toya’s boyfriend Phillips at the wheel.
Katherine and her daughters made it clear they wouldn’t be leaving any time soon. ‘They camped out for most of a week,’ the head of the security firm recalled, coming and going ‘whenever they felt like it.’
Michael’s will came to light about a week after his death; its executors were to be a lawyer, an accountant and a former record company executive named by Michael. It stipulated that 40 per cent of his estate was to be held in trust for Prince, Paris, and his third child Blanket. Another 20 per cent would be assigned to various charities; the remaining 40 per cent would be used to support Katherine, who would be guardian of Michael’s children. After Katherine’s death, her share would revert to the children.
In the meantime, the executors had ‘absolute discretion’ to decide how the money from the Katherine Jackson Trust would be distributed. There was no provision for Michael’s father or siblings.

Moneygrabbing: LaToya, pictured with Paris, and her boyfriend allegedly drove to Michael Jackson's house after his death and stuffed binbags with cash
Over the next two years, the clamour among Katherine’s children to collect their mother’s share of the estate grew ever more threatening. For some time, almost nothing was left over for Katherine’s children; according to the executors, Michael had made it clear that he did not intend to provide for his siblings.
Even when Katherine’s monthly stipend was increased to $8,000, several of her children demanded that she challenge the estate’s administration.
The opening act of the craziest Jackson family drama since Michael’s death began on July 14, when Katherine, 82, was flown to a spa resort in Tucson, Arizona, without the knowledge of her grandchildren, but accompanied by a group of her children.
Within a few days, the media were reporting on a letter that had been signed by five of Michael’s siblings – Randy, Janet, Jermaine, Rebbie, and Tito – demanding that the executors of Michael’s will resign and stating that the will itself was ‘fake, flawed, and fraudulent’.
[The American courts have upheld the will. Yet the allegations, dismissed by the executors as wrong and defamatory, surfaced again last month when David Gest, a longtime friend of Michael, spoke out in support of the siblings’ claim.]
The adults responsible for Michael’s children, including his nephew TJ Jackson, became convinced that Michael’s brothers and sisters intended to gain a conservatorship [a legal form of control in America] over Katherine, possibly by demonstrating her incompetence to serve as the guardian of the children. The money, as everyone knew, would follow those three children.
Still more outlandish, though, were the events of Monday, July 23. Shortly after 1pm, Prince and Paris were in an SUV returning home to the Calabasas estate through the double gates when another SUV, loaded with passengers, pulled right up to its bumper.
Randy Jackson was at the wheel of the tailing vehicle, which made it to the inner gate just as the barrier was coming down.

Legend lost: Michael Jackson left his billion dollar estate to his children, but members of his family are still trying to get their hand on the money
‘He just drove through and broke the arm off,’ recalled Sandra Ribera, an associate of Katherine’s lawyer, who was watching from the pool house. ‘All of a sudden the doors open and there’s this swarm of people pointing cameras all around.’
Ribera said the people in the driveway were Randy Jackson, Janet Jackson, Jermaine Jackson, and several of Prince, Paris, and Blanket’s cousins. It was friendly at first, with hugs all round.
But Katherine’s security team, who were guarding the house, quickly realised that the other Jacksons were there to take Michael’s children. Janet went for her niece Paris, while Randy approached Prince and Jermaine engaged the guards, all three of them still using their cell phones as video cameras. When Janet and Randy told Paris and Prince they were coming with them, both teenagers flatly refused to go.
Prince turned his back on Randy, but Jermaine pulled the boy aside and told him this was something that had been in the planning for three years and that it was important for him to join in with the rest of the family.
Prince shrugged off Jermaine and continued walking toward the house. Paris, meanwhile, made it clear to Janet that she wouldn’t be leaving.
The TMZ entertainment website would initially report, based on anonymous sources, that Janet told Paris she was a ‘spoiled little bitch’ and that Paris answered: ‘This is our house, not the Jackson family house. Get the f*** out!’
When security guards blocked his way, Randy, who had been smiling up until then, began to snarl warnings about not interfering in a family matter.

Caught up: Michael Jackson's three children Blanket, Paris and Prince Michael have had a difficult relationship with their aunts and uncles since the death of their father
One of the guards suggested perhaps he should leave the property and Randy became enraged, cursing in the man’s face, which was when Trent Jackson, a cousin and a member of the security team, grabbed him. The two grappled, then the bull-strong Trent put Randy in a headlock.
The scuffle ended when Trent withdrew with Prince and Paris into the house. Those who were staying at Calabasas would say later that the saddest thing about the entire scene was the way Jermaine had used his sons.
‘Jermaine is cursing as bad as you can curse in front of these kids and fighting and doing all this stuff, and he’s telling his kids to videotape it,’ Ribera recalled. ‘And Jermajesty [Jermaine’s son] . . . is just sobbing. His face is covered in tears. He’s taping, but he’s sobbing.’
A sheriff’s car answering an emergency call arrived at the front gate and everyone froze. The sheriff’s deputies persuaded Randy, Janet, and Jermaine and their group to leave.
‘Gotta love fam,’ Paris tweeted to her followers shortly after they were gone.
On July 26, Katherine was finally brought home. That series of clumsily plotted scenes left her brood more divided than ever. But it was a comfort to her to know that, in the end, they would all be together again.
Katherine’s deal with Forest Lawn Cemetery to acquire Michael’s crypt in the Sanctuary of Ascension had included the purchase of 11 other burial spots. In death, Michael Jackson would be surrounded by the family he had tried to keep at a distance for most of his life.
Untouchable: The Strange Life And Tragic Death of Michael Jackson by Randall Sullivan is published by Grove Press, priced £18.99.
To order your copy at £16.99 with free p&p, call The Review Bookstore on 0843 382 1111 or go to mailshop.co.uk/books


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...th-life-took-vanload-death.html#ixzz2BsIgaVFf
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
^^What is that bit of nonsense that we heard before? Didn't that guy see that the information about Janet and Paris cussing each other was retracted by the paper as false? This is a good read for tabloid buffs. It reads like a hodgepodge of gossip and jumps around from one disconnected tabloid tidbit to another.
 
I wonder if the part with the fake noses is in the book and if he really did an interview with Mc Manus.

If there is a fake nose story, how could he not milk it. I dismiss all the fake nose stories that are taken for the truth. First, I heard that when Michael moved from Neverland they had to burn tons of boxes of fake noses. Then we heard that his nose went missing during the autopsy and the tv picked it up even though this was all lies. This guy has to have his nose story, his surgery story, and his allegations story for him to have a complete Michael story--at least in the eyes of the media.

What I find strange with people is why would they buy a book with tit bits that they find in their newspapers and magazines? By now everyone knows these stories printed above. So are the main buyers of books like this people who never heard the stories before. This book seems to be very expensive too.
 
yes it's in the book as well as mention of the plastic surgeries.
 
Why include this fake nose BS when it has nothing to do with the article's content?
 
What about the claim that Katherine, Joseph, and Jermaine wanted $750,00 a piece to attend the MSG 2001 30th anniversary show? And that they basically broke into NL and Michael hid in the secret room off his bedroom while they tore the place apart? Also, the claim that Latoya et al ransacked Carolwood for cash etc? He says that Jermaine's kids (Jermajesty) were at the Calabasas incident in July. I never heard that before. Is it true?
 
jamba;3736230 said:
What about the claim that Katherine, Joseph, and Jermaine wanted $750,00 a piece to attend the MSG 2001 30th anniversary show? And that they basically broke into NL and Michael hid in the secret room off his bedroom while they tore the place apart? Also, the claim that Latoya et al ransacked Carolwood for cash etc? He says that Jermaine's kids (Jermajesty) were at the Calabasas incident in July. I never heard that before. Is it true?

probably about as true as this below
THE JARFUL OF STICK-ON NOSES
In his closet at Neverland, Jackson kept a big jar of fake noses of various shapes and sizes, surrounded by tubes of stage glue. ‘He told me they were for disguises,’ recalled Adrian McManus, one of his staff at the ranch. At this point, Michael was disguising the result of at least six rhinoplasty operations: a pair of nostrils surrounded by a rim of shrivelled, shrunken, discoloured cartilage.

The singer had been a skilled make-up artist since his teens, and in 15 minutes at the mirror could create an appearance that fooled most people. Plastic surgeons had been speculating on TV since as early as 1990 that the tip of his nose had been replaced by a prosthetic of either bone or plastic.

By about 2001, the way his nose changed from year to year, sometimes from week to week, had given him away.
But he managed to salvage something from this personal disaster: at least he could now have the nose he had always wanted – Bobby Driscoll’s.

The most famous child star of the late Forties and early Fifties, Driscoll had for years been an icon of Jackson’s to rival Shirley Temple. There is footage from 2002 of Jackson standing amid an enthralled crowd outside the Virgin Megastore in Times Square, New York, his Bobby Driscoll nose raised to the sky as if to declare: ‘I am Peter Pan.’

Its hard to say what truth is in his stories. For the most part It is a bunch a crap based on real events but he embelishes it with old tabloid sensationalism. - We have to take it all with a grain of salt. We cant just say all the negative he says abot Jaxns is true and the neg he say about MJ is not. Im sure there is some truth hidden in his book but it must be compaired to prior documentation and who the source for the stories he tells is. Myself I wouldnt quote anything fron him as being truth.
 
I wonder if the part with the fake noses is in the book and if he really did an interview with Mc Manus.

I have the impression that many of Sullivan's stories are copy-and-pastes from newspaper articles. So maybe he just dug up some old interview with McManus that he used.

It's an indication that unfortunately like so many other journalists, Sullivan did not do his homework on the allegations. If he had ever read the court transcripts he would not quote someone like McManus as a credible source.
 
Last edited:
What about the claim that Katherine, Joseph, and Jermaine wanted $750,00 a piece to attend the MSG 2001 30th anniversary show? And that they basically broke into NL and Michael hid in the secret room off his bedroom while they tore the place apart? Also, the claim that Latoya et al ransacked Carolwood for cash etc? He says that Jermaine's kids (Jermajesty) were at the Calabasas incident in July. I never heard that before. Is it true?

I think at least the part about Jermaine wanting more money to attend MSG might be true.
At the end MJ end up paying more in order to Jermaine to show up.
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=103470&page=1#.UJ9utqXrGLU
There are more articles about this + Jermaine's statement is out there too if you like to google it.

About Jermaine's kids being in Calabasas. That too could be true as there were articles at the time in which some cousins were mentioned but not named, so it could have been Jermaine's kids.

As for La Toya ransacking Carolwood, it is true. She would loved to deny it but she can't. She gave interviews right outside of the house, and said that there were no money left. If she didn't runback the house, how would she know there were no money? She obviously ransacked=searched the house.
 
probably about as true as this below


Its hard to say what truth is in his stories. For the most part It is a bunch a crap based on real events but he embelishes it with old tabloid sensationalism. - We have to take it all with a grain of salt. We cant just say all the negative he says abot Jaxns is true and the neg he say about MJ is not. Im sure there is some truth hidden in his book but it must be compaired to prior documentation and who the source for the stories he tells is. Myself I wouldnt quote anything fron him as being truth.

I think he took it from old tabloids articles, and probably from Victor Gutierrez book.
 
Didnt david guest confirm the whole jermaine threatening to pull out unless he was paid more. not surprised the filth at the mail are promoting this they need a new tabloidarelli seeing as he wrote many trashy pieces for
them. i guesd they have to keep
the brainwashing of the masses
going.

Rather strange senario considering sulivan is pally eith mann and saunders yet erites such a book.no surprise he trashes mj but the family aswell. kinda says what saunders and mann really think doesnt it?
 
Back
Top