oh, that rings a bell. Mike bloody Myers is right. I've seen a few fragments of his work. Could never see the point.@Fuzball i see it now. it is indeed a michael bloody myers bug ... oh come on.
give meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee grit!
hit me
take a shot boy
Watch out babe he will be coming for us in his pretty little hockey mask soon.fs peep round the corner- ooh i'm scaredoh, that rings a bell. Mike bloody Myers is right. I've seen a few fragments of his work.
Exactly my point! lolCould never see the point.
you are not suppose to love on the opponent Darling Ditsy boythat's pretty close to SSG
Ah . I was meaning to get to this post. Fuz is doing me hed in i feel zonked tOK, wend, let's give you a quick run-down on Michael Clark. Here's a beautiful photo from the 80's
He is beautiful ...he's lovely .. hes up my street , i googled him actually and the first picture he has on his wiki, i was again -oh wow ..look at that stare and his make up ----.yeah i like this guy. Thanks for making me aware of his artistry babe its appreciated.
I like this quote and his mindset. You have introduced me to so much art and culture. It's really appreciated.And here's a bit more info:
"A glittering career as a Royal Ballet dancer was all but guaranteed, but the sense of dislocation grew deeper. "I felt like an alien. My future was all mapped out for me and that was so uninteresting. I lost interest [in ballet] and wanted something that I didn't understand."
(emphasis added)
You can see he has the go get him - in him ,Clark dismayed his teachers by quitting the Royal Ballet. He joined the contemporary dance company Ballet Rambert and formed his own company in 1984 at the age of 22. What followed was a series of dance works that were informed by his classical training – "I did try and reject all that, but I couldn't. It was in my body" – but adopted the sounds, aesthetics and spirit of punk and new wave.
I love this"I had to make the two worlds come together," he says.
See , it is out the box thinking. Makes me think more I love tht"The [Sex] Pistols were very theatrical actually – there was a camp aspect to what they did.
He has that vibe.And darkness too which was very attractive."
God i bet i'll love them allThose quotes are from 2018. It got me thinking back to his costumes and props and that is interesting bc I always had mixed feelings about them.
I get excited !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111when they are OTTI loved the OTT aspect and the
Please ! more !crazy theatricality
of it all but it was also problematic bc sometimes the 'stuff' got in the way of the dance, imo. It could obscure things.
Gonna lap that up haha hahaAlso, Michael's sense of humour was incredibly juvenile and boring so that was a pain to sit through.
Ahahaha , He was all child like then , He was pushing the boundaries i would thinkWhat, are you 5 years old, Michael? Gah! So he did push us, in different ways.
God , that is a beautiful expression ! an explosion of colour that has me drooling because i know it will be such -can't take eyes off him/what he is bringing to the stage - artBut that someone could bring together ballet, punk, rock n' roll, wildness, genius, an explosion of colour,
He sounds electric. I liked him soon as you posted he the other day .It is a shame he is not doing it now but doesn't want to . can't force a person.exquisite beauty, pantomime, loudness (his shows were like gigs and he would have a band onstage with the dancers) - all of that in one show. I had never seen anything like it. I had never seen anyone do that. I'm not saying he was 100% original. No-one ever is. But the ballet & punk combination, no-one else was doing it at that time, iirc. I can't think of anyone else who was doing full-length ballets like that. You had classical ballet, contemporary ballet and contemporary dance. And Michael was all of that but also something else entirely. Most of his contemporaries were presenting an evening programme consisting of 2 or 3 short pieces. Which is perfectly fine.
Also when he was speaking , just that mindset .It makes him pretty original for me. He is marching to the beat of his own drum . that's importantBut Michael had other ideas.
Well last night post was the ultimate - it threw me across the wall nearly haha . This post i think highly of , thank You @zinniabooklovergod, I'm rambling which wasn't the intention, lol.
I see some danger in there babeCanaletto / The Grand Canal, Venice, Looking South toward the Rialto Bridge
Nope. Not child like. Just childish. An irritating d**khead.Ahahaha , He was all child like then
He did push boundaries and sometimes it was interesting and sophisticated and sometimes he was simply a d**k.He was pushing the boundaries i would think
oh, he's still doing his thing but quite low-key compared to the dizzy heights of the 1980's. He is (or was? I'm out of the loop) the resident choreographer at The Barbican. It's kind of interesting looking at his career compared to Wayne McGregor. I have often thought that Wayne McGregor has done things that Michael should have been doing. People find Michael difficult to work with bc he's too much of a perfectionist and it slows things down way too much. Also, he's such a maverick, he just cannot conform in any way, shape or form, he simply cannot do it, and people still struggle with that even though they know that's what they're gonna get.He sounds electric. I liked him soon as you posted he the other day .It is a shame he is not doing it now but doesn't want to
He is a total original.Also when he was speaking , just that mindset .It makes him pretty original for me. He is marching to the beat of his own drum . that's important
zin says it as it is ! . well he was a baby though right?Nope. Not child like. Just childish. An irritating d**khead.
Well i guess he was much too much - take me as you find me and that doesn't translate well for most of the entertainment world, especially the dance world.He did push boundaries and sometimes it was interesting and sophisticated and sometimes he was simply a d**k.
once its there it never goes ,oh, he's still doing his thing but quite low-key compared to the dizzy heights of the 1980's.
I suppose Wayne is more soft. I will do that kind of robot mindsetHe is (or was? I'm out of the loop) the resident choreographer at The Barbican. It's kind of interesting looking at his career compared to Wayne McGregor. I have often thought that Wayne McGregor has done things that Michael should have been doing.
non conformists though , their middle name is - hard timePeople find Michael difficult to work with bc he's too much of a perfectionist and it slows things down way too much. Also, he's such a maverick, he just cannot conform in any way, shape or form,
Now this deserves a heart eyed emoji !maverick
Well they are missing out , He tell them , warns them before hand "hi im an arse this is what you'll get " Can't be any more fair than that hahahe simply cannot do it, and people still struggle with that even though they know that's what they're gonna get.
Thank you though if it was anything like yesterday and a couple week back , i am sure i will get it. Just looking at the thumb nail of the vid i posted - its a YES! YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!He is a total original.
The costumes for his work in the 1980's were all done by BodyMap. I'll try to find some photos to post. Just like Michael's work, I don't think the costumes translate well into photos so you won't get the full idea, imo. But you'll get the gist.
He was a baby and that is important. He had his own company by the age of 22 and it was an instant success. He went mega. He was the rock star of the ballet world. His shows at Sadlers' Wells were always sold out. For Curious Orange in 1988 they had to give him a 3 week run (you would normally only get 2 weeks, even the big companies only get 2 weeks). The 3 weeks sold out super quick. The atmosphere was electric, like a gig, not like a ballet performance. People used to complain about him being an arse as if that was any surprise. Anyone having that much adulation and success (and pressure, he was 22 and the only choreographer for his company and he employed a lot of people) is going to go mental to some degree. People used to tell me what an arse he was as if they expected that to put me off him. I mean, seriously, people? I love his art and him as an artist. I don't really care if he sometimes acts like a spoilt brat (according to you). It's what he does onstage that counts. I never heard anything vicious about him, only stuff about him being irritating. Well, I can handle that, thanks all the same.zin says it as it is ! . well he was a baby though right?
The dance world, ballet in particular, is so conventional.Well i guess he was much too much - take me as you find me and that doesn't translate well for most of the entertainment world, especially the dance world
I wouldn't call Wayne McGregor soft. He's pretty adventurous and boundary pushing, too.I suppose Wayne is more soft
It really is.non conformists though , their middle name is - hard time
I think they are missing out. If they can't find a way to cope with Michael being Michael then shame on them, that's what I say.Well they are missing out , He tell them , warns them before hand "hi im an arse this is what you'll get " Can't be any more fair than that haha
Actually, I've gone off the idea of posting photos of the costumes. They just don't look right in the photos. Wah!Thank you though if it was anything like yesterday and a couple week back , i am sure i will get it. Just looking at the thumb nail of the vid i posted - its a YES! YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!
It is cool .
Absolutely that is the core here. He had an idea , amazing at his craft , outspoken, forward thinker, was thrust into the unknown - at an early age.He was a baby and that is important.
The instant must have been so overwhelming , terrifying , elation ,thrilling, shit your pants scary , just all emotions all for one mind to handle.He had his own company by the age of 22 and it was an instant success.
Yeah that babe mmHe went mega.
Wow . I love this . for me babe , His idea and artistry is one of a kind.He was the rock star of the ballet world. His shows at Sadlers' Wells were always sold out. For Curious Orange in 1988 they had to give him a 3 week run (you would normally only get 2 weeks, even the big companies only get 2 weeks). The 3 weeks sold out super quick. The atmosphere was electric, like a gig, not like a ballet performance.
Mm people and their complaints- people don't give do they , they take take takePeople used to complain about him being an arse as if that was any surprise. Anyone having that much adulation and success
The big one . it's this that is the basis to arseholio ness lol(and pressure,
absolutely agree with youhe was 22 and the only choreographer for his company and he employed a lot of people) is going to go mental to some degree.
that's their weak argumentPeople used to tell me what an arse he was as if they expected that to put me off him.
he is an instant win with me tooI mean, seriously, people? I love his art and him as an artist.
They can't pigeon hole him can they ? so then he must be bad (according to em) They don't know his story and they don't care to knowI don't really care if he sometimes acts like a spoilt brat (according to you).
Love the guyIt's what he does onstage that counts. I never heard anything vicious about him, only stuff about him being irritating.
Exactly right . i am glad you enjoyed his art and took time to explore him.Well, I can handle that, thanks all the same.
I like that babeI didn't love everything he did - I never do with my people - but when I watched his work I understood it. I felt seen.
Well when i googled Wayne he was like Wayne Sleep or something ....[i am not hating on sleep or mcgregor they are fine, well sleep is ok but they are not too interesting to me I don't know just regular. ] So , just something about Michael and probably the rebel punk aspect and for me the drama aspect but Mike is real so , I enjoy the realness. It is refreshing. Also the fact he made the shows like gigs - unheard of to me.The dance world, ballet in particular, is so conventional.
I wouldn't call Wayne McGregor soft. He's pretty adventurous and boundary pushing, too.
They like people to fit into a category so, a ballet dancer 'should' be meek , and mild , whiny , white tights and 24. 7 camp / Dot Cotton GAY vibes you know ? it is all stereotype .It really is.
I think they are missing out. If they can't find a way to cope with Michael being Michael then shame on them, that's what I say.
No it is fine babe i will google ...I will see what pin can offerActually, I've gone off the idea of posting photos of the costumes. They just don't look right in the photos. Wah!
The correct answer, of course, is… ?I knew it. I knew he'd called it wrong. Unless it was deliberate, of course, but does he have the brain power for that? I doubt it.
You did, lol.i had alot to say lol im excited
He was being trained and prepared to be the prime male ballet star for the Royal Ballet for the 80's and 90's. He would have had a solid, safe career, everything mapped out, couldn't fail. Would have been brilliant, would have had the pick of roles, dance partners, choreographers to work with. The critics would have swooned over him. For Britain to produce a male ballet star of that calibre is not guaranteed. We can produce star ballerinas easily enough, male ballet stars not so much. Michael was beautiful, his line was truly exquisite, he was a superb dancer, his technique was flawless. He had it all, he just could not fail.Absolutely that is the core here. He had an idea , amazing at his craft , outspoken, forward thinker, was thrust into the unknown - at an early age.
ooh, hard disagree, doll. Imo, you are mixing up two different things. For the general public, I think this is still how they see male ballet dancers. But the dance world itself, no, no, no, this is not how they think at all. They know this is not true. I think the dance world, even the ballet world, can cope with mavericks. It's a world full of artists, after all. But ballet is also very, very rigid in many ways. And there is a ... hm, submissiveness might be the wrong word but, certainly, I think the dancers are meant to suppress their autonomy and individuality to some extent.They like people to fit into a category so, a ballet dancer 'should' be meek , and mild , whiny , white tights and camp / Dot Cotton GAY vibes you know ? it is all stereotype .
Hm, well, you do have a wild imagination, girl. I don't think any of this is what happened, lol. There hasn't ever been a witch hunt against Michael. Just the usual ballet incomprehension - 'wah! what do we do with this wild, outspoken person? wah!'. The ballet world didn't really know what to do with Michael or with Sylvie Guillem but they are both loved, thankfully.Michael is wild , ballsy and a forward thinker. So they automatically think . "Oh , because he is not like any of that , well .. he can't be a ballet dancer ! Who is he then ? Grrrrr " Then a witch hunt occurs - and immediately any of his actions or ideas get their backs up
you're missing the point. She was never gonna go for J.Bond / DC. THAT is the point.The correct answer, of course, is… ?
I'm in love. For All Time!
I know ! It is so cool . I just can't with the energy of this . !!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111111I'm in love. For All Time!
But there’s only one correct answer, regardless of whom I ask!you're missing the point. She was never gonna go for J.Bond / DC. THAT is the point.
If you want to know which of those guys she would pick, ask her.
Nope. You're STILL missing the bleedin' point and I am too tired to explain. I've had the fortnight from hell so I'll leave you two to do your thing.But there’s only one correct answer, regardless of whom I ask!
I went a bit too overboard i think babe hahaYou did, lol.
I think he will have turned ballet around...dance ,He was being trained and prepared to be the prime male ballet star for the Royal Ballet for the 80's and 90's.
But.................................................. he would have been on my wall that is for sure-He would have had a solid, safe career, everything mapped out, couldn't fail. Would have been brilliant, would have had the pick of roles, dance partners, choreographers to work with.
Oh , i could see the titles zin. And all the excitement all the saturday night tv showsThe critics would have swooned over him.
For Britain to produce a male ballet star of that calibre is not guaranteed. We can produce star ballerinas easily enough, male ballet stars not so much. Michael was beautiful, his line was truly exquisite, he was a superb dancer, his technique was flawless. He had it all, he just could not fail.
Yep. he just didn't feel it in his heart.And Michael couldn't stand it.
Everyone missed outHe wanted out.
He is realHe was a punk and a rebel and he had to go and do his thing.
I'm getting all protective over him hahaooh, hard disagree, doll.
The word rigid makes me wince babe lolImo, you are mixing up two different things. For the general public, I think this is still how they see male ballet dancers. But the dance world itself, no, no, no, this is not how they think at all. They know this is not true. I think the dance world, even the ballet world, can cope with mavericks. It's a world full of artists, after all. But ballet is also very, very rigid in many ways.
Yeah i agree . Its suppressed maybe ...suppressed creativityAnd there is a ... hm, submissiveness might be the wrong word but, certainly, I think the dancers are meant to suppress their autonomy and individuality to some extent.
in him . Then he will get a bad rep i guess.individuality
If you look at Sylvie Guillem's story you can see it clearly. She was very assertive and so they nicknamed her 'Mademoiselle Non'
Good.meaning she didn't do what she was told.
Bloody good on her.They would tell her they wanted her to do such and such a role and she would refuse.
Because she went against them and had a mind and a mouth ....Oh , I like her !Well, it's her flaming career, why shouldn't she speak up if she's not happy with the roles being offered her or the partners they want her to team up with? She's the one making money for them, getting the punters in and getting loads of press coverage. Why shouldn't she have a say in her own career?
My lips are sealed LOLHm, well, you do have a wild imagination, girl.
No i guess but i guess i meant that they didn't understand his art, or him.I don't think any of this is what happened, lol.
To me , thats a bit of a hunt though. They tried to tame him , keep his ideas down , Sort of block his ongoing creativity so he kind of went ah fk it , and i don't want to be told this , this this . got angry, more-so frustrated and misunderstood and people then say . "Oh hes too much ! Can't have him doing his thing!"There hasn't ever been a witch hunt against Michael. Just the usual ballet incomprehension - 'wah! what do we do with this wild, outspoken person? wah!'.
Good. Good. Goood Loved but maybe stopped in some ways.The ballet world didn't really know what to do with Michael or with Sylvie Guillem but they are both loved, thankfully.
Mmm . See , I really liked Andy. Oh god. hey i am thinking about him and Andy what work they could have created , the imagery and the danceCan't remember which critic it was - don't think it was a British one - but someone once described Michael as the Andy Warhol of the ballet world.
What makes you think that I’m missing the point?Nope. You're STILL missing the bleedin' point and I am too tired to explain. I've had the fortnight from hell so I'll leave you two to do your thing.
oh . for f i cant breathe