I'm not trying to argue anything. I'm genuinely interested why people think it is Michael's/his estate/his kids job to help cousins/siblings etc to find job or other means to make living? I have not come across such a thinking any place else, other than here when the talk is about Jac family.
I was thinking Miko Brando the other day, and thought that he wasn't too proud to take a bg job, and later set up his own flower shop, even though he was son of the Hollywood legend. He doesn't have that entitlement thingy in him, which I admire of him. There are millions of other kids/siblings/cousins of famous people and they don't go on like some of Michael's family. I suppose I'm coming from neck of the woods, where people are appreciated for what they have done themselves, and not because they happen to have famous family member.
I wonder, lets say Bruce Springsteen's nephew/cousin/sibling carrying on like 3T or other members, would you still think that same way or would you think he is a loser riding on Bruce coattails?
I understand exactly what you're saying and actually agree with that, although I don't think the nephews are bad like certain people sometimes. I was in the middle of trying to edit my post last night when the web site went down, so I wasn't sure how it came out in the end.
But I went off and was reading a piece on Marlon Brando, ironically, and thought about Miko myself. And also thought about Jimmy Osmond, who single handedly got his family back on their feet and now they're all doing quite well on their own.
I think since I grew up with them, and was a kid with them, and watched them all grow up, get married, etc. etc. I feel an affection for some of them. They gave me some happy days, listening to their records and watching them perform on TV. And I was around when jealousy started to rear its ugly head back in 1984, so nothing they do surprises me at all-I I don't love any of them, except Michael, but I do want them to do well, and I don't want them to do anything embarrassing, or marr Michael's legacy. So I do watch all their shows, and listen to their interviews, etc. Sounds bad to say, I guess, but I think I do that with somewhat of a watchful eye.
My knee jerk reaction to working for the estate, I think, has been based on some of the speculation here, and I'm picturing Michael's kids being pressured and bullied and used, I don't want that for them-they certainly don't deserve that. Somebody here (maybe you?) said they didn't do themselves any favors with the talk of Musical Royalty, carrying on the legacy, etc. And I totally agree with that. I would think they would realize that Michael was a one in a billion talent, that doesn't come around but maybe once in a lifetime, and that's why he was all the more astonishing. And just make peace with that and find their own passion in life.