The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and Other Theories

Re: How can I take this seriously???

tnzq.jpg


http://twitpic.com/3vikci

http://www.myspace.com/truenewszone/blog/541920432


Toys in a courtroom? Really? :bugeyed :doh:



:fear:

I always like TNZ MySpace page it's very interesting! That pic ain't no joke just look at the real footage! :yes:


I think someone within the judicial system needs to explain this about the toys.
Funny u say that cause someone left 2 comments to T-MEZ (on his youtube) asking him about this! I have no idea if he responded yet? But, I doubt he will! lol
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

Very strange, huh? :bugeyed Well, I do not think it's normal to see toys in a courtroom is a place that deals with serious questions. Or not? :fear:

Or maybe the people there are so fond of toys and they were put there to be part of the decoration of the courtroom. :scratch: :smilerolleyes: > *Being ironic now....* :girl_whistle:

It would be interesting if someone could explain it, because I really do not understand or maybe I'm too stupid. :fear:

I know, right? I've been considering all sorts of things, like - maybe the case before Murray's was one that involved child witnesses and they just had the toys there to make the atmpsphere less scary...:scratch: Far fetched, I know, and surely they would've cleaned up? I've seen a few courtrooms in my life (for school projects) and never seen anything more than a small ornament on judge's desk. hella strange.

that was a good find btw.
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

I always like TNZ MySpace page it's very interesting! That pic ain't no joke just look at the real footage! :yes:


Funny u say that cause someone left 2 comments to T-MEZ (on his youtube) asking him about this! I have no idea if he responded yet? But, I doubt he will! lol

I saw them, too. He won't respond, at least not on youtube. Mez is brilliant and all kinds of awesome, but he's also a technological analphabet. Shhh! :innocent:
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

I always like TNZ MySpace page it's very interesting! That pic ain't no joke just look at the real footage! :yes:


Funny u say that cause someone left 2 comments to T-MEZ (on his youtube) asking him about this! I have no idea if he responded yet? But, I doubt he will! lol


I left a comment but it hasnt turned up.


I scanned though them now and cant find the ones your referring to, but I saw this comment which is worthy of putting here as a very important and valid point!!!...


What I find totally odd.... that Murray wasn't required to stand when the judge was addressing him or when Murray was responding to the judge. All court hearings/arrignements people/atty's stand when? addressing the judge and vice versa...

MJSONLY 15 hours ago
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

I saw this comment which is worthy of putting here as a very important and valid point!!!...

What I find totally odd.... that Murray wasn't required to stand when the judge was addressing him or when Murray was responding to the judge. All court hearings/arrignements people/atty's stand when? addressing the judge and vice versa...

MJSONLY 15 hours ago
I didn't know that! Hmmm! Thanks for sharing!

I scanned though them now and cant find the ones your referring to

I found them.

I have never been inside a courtroom, but I do? find it very curious that these objects were all over the courtroom on that day. I would appreciate knowing your opinion on this... because though the situation is very grave, it causes many to wonder if this is not actually a hoax!


MsChannigan 1 day ago 2
pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif

Mr. Mesereau... is it customary for a courtroom to have strewn all over the various desks toy animals? Because if you examine the courtroom carefully, on the day Conrad Murray was araigned, you will find: A white toy rabbit (beside the police officer standing behind Murray), a chocolate hippo head, on Judge Pastor's desk, a head in a jar, near judges pastor's desk, a plastic boar, on the court reporter's desk, a teddy bear, a cat, a cow, etc. ?


MsChannigan 1 day ago
The same question twice! But, no answer! But, two people left a thumbs up! lol

U can find the questions under this video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7T-8lsrlRw
 
Last edited:
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

Thanks for that Blue topaz! :)
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

I left a comment but it hasnt turned up.


I scanned though them now and cant find the ones your referring to, but I saw this comment which is worthy of putting here as a very important and valid point!!!...

What I find totally odd.... that Murray wasn't required to stand when the judge was addressing him or when Murray was responding to the judge. All court hearings/arrignements people/atty's stand when? addressing the judge and vice versa...

MJSONLY 15 hours ago

Actually, I've sat in hearings where both attorney and client sat, adressing the Judge. Same with the D.A.
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

Actually, I've sat in hearings where both attorney and client sat, adressing the Judge. Same with the D.A.
^ oh okay good to know too! lol I guess it all depends on how one runs their courtroom?!

Thanks for that Blue topaz! :)
No problem! And u spelled my username the way it should be spelled! LOL @ myself for putting an E instead of an A long ago! But, hey, makes it a lil different, like me! :p
 
Last edited:
Re: How can I take this seriously???

This video :horror .... also has some interesting things:


[youtube]DHY2_YnBHkw[/youtube]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHY2_YnBHkw



:fear:





I always like TNZ MySpace page it's very interesting!
:yes:

TNZ always makes me think of TMZ. LOL :fear:




That pic ain't no joke just look at the real footage! :yes:

Yes.... :fear:




I know, right? I've been considering all sorts of things, like - maybe the case before Murray's was one that involved child witnesses and they just had the toys there to make the atmpsphere less scary...:scratch: Far fetched, I know, and surely they would've cleaned up? I've seen a few courtrooms in my life (for school projects) and never seen anything more than a small ornament on judge's desk. hella strange.

that was a good find btw.

Or maybe before the hearing they were having some kind of fun with these toys. :D > Hey, I'm kidding! :fear:
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

Actually, I've sat in hearings where both attorney and client sat, adressing the Judge. Same with the D.A.

Thanks for letting us know, I have never been in a court so I have no idea.

As a fairly serious case I am still wondering why he didnt have to stand. Perhaps it will come to that further down the track?
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

^ oh okay good to know too! lol I guess it all depends on how one runs their courtroom?!

Yes and with all those animals it is certainly one interesting courtroom all up! LOL


No problem! And u spelled my username the way it should be spelled! LOL @ myself for putting an E instead of an A long ago! But, hey, makes it a lil different, like me! :p

Isnt that funny I had never noticed that!..now it is gonna stand out to me! hehe

I am slightly vision impaired folks so often I miss things and my spelling is terrible at times. :bugeyed
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

Actually, I've sat in hearings where both attorney and client sat, adressing the Judge. Same with the D.A.

uhm.:yes: it's actually more common than people realize. some judges require ppl to stand up when they're being addressed, but most don't as it just creates unnecessary noise and disruption.
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

Or maybe before the hearing they were having some kind of fun with these toys. :D > Hey, I'm kidding! :fear:

could be that they have adult witnesses that have to cuddle a teddy bear and suck on their thumb for a while before they can get up on the stand and testify... hey, it's a scary experience! :lol:
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

could be that they have adult witnesses that have to cuddle a teddy bear and suck on their thumb for a while before they can get up on the stand and testify... hey, it's a scary experience! :lol:

Heck yes!! Always better when the client is scared out of their mind, unable to say a thing. Better than somebody suddenly jumping up, loosening up their tie with that expression in their face that indicates that 'you ain't seen nothing yet'- to clarify what went wrong the last 30 years in precisely that marriage!
:D

"Get this party started!!" :bugeyed
 
Re: How can I take this seriously???

uhm.:yes: it's actually more common than people realize. some judges require ppl to stand up when they're being addressed, but most don't as it just creates unnecessary noise and disruption.

Seriously... in most court room you don't have enough space to get up and push your chair back into the 'gate' without causing some serious ripple effect!

I do recall sitting down once in the wrong chair. Oops. 'Will the earth please open up and swallow me hole??? :bugeyed'
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

Those pictures of toys in the courtroom are shocking for me....honestly.
I never saw anything like that in my life. It looks like a circus.
Absolutely f****** strange.
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

^^^
I am wondering too...
Sometimes...I think all those theories are too good to be true and that all of it is just my wishfull thinking.
But when I look at things from another perspective ( look ouside the box - like Michael said ) , then is suddenly hits me and I think : Michael is alive !
Sometimes everything makes sense...all the strange things that were noticed and there are so many, nobody can deny that.
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

Sometimes I think the researchers are looking to deep into things and we see what we want to see...
I've been taking some steps back from the hoax recently. I hope we will find out what did happen on June 25th.
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

^Same here. Mainly the numerology some fans use to prove everything is just too farfetched for me. I really do not think Michael would be busy calculating all the dates and compare them to say the 2040 on the space ship of the HIStory tour, because 25+6+2009=2040. What would be the purpose of that? Also the illuminati are just a stretch too far. I don't think there is such a secret society trying to take over the world while Michael tries to save us all from them like some superman who had to 'die' first to escape them. These things that some hoax forums dwell on just make me think: yeah right, that's just desperation right there, and guilability. They make me believe less in the hoax actually.

References in songs and strange things that happened after June 25th do make me wonder though. But it seems no new clues have appeared for a while now. While stuffed animals in a court room are a bit wacky, there could be a reasonable explanation for it (like a children's case in the same court room just before this case) and again I don't feel like Michael would plant stuffed animals in a court room to show us he's alive (or that the case is bogus for that matter). Hardly anyone is picking up on these things as they are not out-of-this-world remakable. So hoaxers are grasping at straws I'm afraid. I'm still not 100% convinced Michael is dead, but something significant has to happen during the court case (Murray not being convicted for one) to make me keep the faith. I don't feel like waiting for MJ's return or a sign of life until 2040 (which is the equivalent of the time some Elivis fans have waited for their idol to come back). It's not healthy to do so. Again, I hope this will all unfold to be some grand stunt to put the media and all haters in their place, but I'm very much afraid reality is just way harsher and that MJ is indeed dead :( Sorry to be such a downer today...
 
Last edited:
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

^Same here. Mainly the numerology some fans use to prove everything is just too farfetched for me. I really do not think Michael would be busy calculating all the dates and compare them to say the 2040 on the space ship of the HIStory tour, because 25+6+2009=2040. What would be the purpose of that? Also the illuminati are just a stretch too far. I don't think there is such a secret society trying to take over the world while Michael tries to save us all from them like some superman who had to 'die' first to escape them. These things that some hoax forums dwell on just make me think: yeah right, that's just desperation right there, and guilability. They make me believe less in the hoax actually.

References in songs and strange things that happened after June 25th do make me wonder though. But it seems no new clues have appeared for a while now. While stuffed animals in a court room are a bit wacky, there could be a reasonable explanation for it (like a children's case in the same court room just before this case) and again I don't feel like Michael would plant stuffed animals in a court room to show us he's alive (or that the case is bogus for that matter). Hardly anyone is picking up on these things as they are not out-of-this-world remakable. So hoaxers are grasping at straws I'm afraid. I'm still not 100% convinced Michael is dead, but something significant has to happen during the court case (Murray not being convicted for one) to make me keep the faith. I don't feel like waiting for MJ's return or a sign of life until 2040 (which is the equivalent of the time some Elivis fans have waited for their idol to come back). It's not healthy to do so. Again, I hope this will all unfold to be some grand stunt to put the media and all haters in their place, but I'm very much afraid reality is just way harsher and that MJ is indeed dead :( Sorry to be such a downer today...

As a matter of fact,Illuminati does exist lol:ph34r:
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

^Perhaps. But their influence in this matter is questionable.
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

While stuffed animals in a court room are a bit wacky, there could be a reasonable explanation for it (like a children's case in the same court room just before this case)

But so many toys scattered around the room? Each toy in one part of the room? Seriously, I do not think this is normal. Or there were many children in the room? Or those people love toys and they are part of the decor of the room. :smilerolleyes: Anyway, it's still strange to me and inexplicable. :bugeyed Or maybe I'm very donkey to understand that. :fear:
 
Last edited:
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

^^^
That is indeed strange and I never saw a courtroom turned into a playground even if children were there....but I also think if children need to testify for some reason...they would rather use video-link. Have no idea....
 
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

Maybe there are toys in the courtroom for all the members of the cast to relax and play with them between the takes.
 
Last edited:
Re: The Hoax Theory - Discussing Errors, Inconsistencies, Observations and other theories

Um...I know this might be a lil` offtopic but which were MJ's last words before he died?
 
Back
Top