The Estate share the full Ghosts short film on VEVO

*sigh*

Ivy, I specifically gave an example of APWNN’s comment section and comments being disabled for Cirque’s APWNN version due to a discussion here. No one is stopping anyone from any method they chose to correct what they feel is an error. I chose to discuss it here and it seems you and others are discussing it here too. If anyone has indeed sent an email or has chosen another more direct method, I believe you have noticed no method has been effective as the typo remains.

I believe you understand Sony is a business and it is not a secret they are seeking profit. The Amazon/Itunes link is the obvious hint in case you missed it. Thriller sells itself at this time of year so no need to point 79M+ FB fans in that direction (although there is nothing wrong with that). Either you are deflecting or not paying attention as I clearly wrote Estate/Sony will not be enriched by those watching the clip and going to YT for the full clip (where no advertising monies await Sony by the way).

You are using your generalization of the characteristics of the casual fan who you believe does not have 40 minutes to watch the full Ghosts short film; not logic or common sense. The fact is Estate/Sony cannot deliver the full short film due to Kingdom’s ownership; that is the reason why Vevo carries the less than four minute version. A MJ fan's supposed time constraints has nothing to do with it.
 
Another problem is that i think is that it's too much of a Disney style childrens movie... nothing as edgy, cool and something for "grown ups" as Thriller. Not a good basis to become "cult".


I disagree with this. I can see nothing more "grown up" in Thriller than in Ghosts. In fact, it's actually the other way around IMO. Thriller is fun and entertaining but there's nothing really in depth in it. While Ghosts does have a message that goes beyond the "fun horror story" thing. To me Ghosts is actually more edgy and cool than Thriller. IMO the reason why it's not so much cult is simply that MJ was not as popular at the time it was released when he was when Thriller was released. For something to become cult the public needs to relate some personal experience to it and it needs to become an integral part of pop culture. Thriller has that factor due to MJ's immense popularity at the time and due to the fact that to the general public he could do no wrong at the time. Ghosts just does not have that advantage, but objectively to me it's a better film. I would even say Thriller is more popular because it's lighter and less deep than Ghosts. Much of the general public liked their MJ to be a fun, entertaining, dancing MJ, not really someone who criticizes society and holds up a mirror in front of it.


You can take it as a no if you like but, you would be remiss in believing there is only one method to reach Estate/Sony.

Well, hoping (but not knowing) that someone from the Estate/Sony would read this thread is not really "a method to reach the Estate/Sony" IMO. Some people here present themselves as really outraged and passionate about the issue, so one would think if it's so important to them they would take 5 minutes of their lives to bring it to the attention of the Estate/Sony, instead of days of complaining here, since none of us can do anything about it. But I guess Ivy is right and that's not really the goal.
 
The first filming goes back to 1993 i think. At least thats when there was supposed to be a Michael Jackson single and videoclip released for a song called "Adam's Groove" for the soundtrack of the second Addams Family film. The single was already in music distributors lists for upcoming releases, but then, when the big scandal hit, it was all cancelled.

The video must have been pretty much finished, as Michael was long away on tour by then.

Rare recently surfaced screenshots from the 93 short film:
qfwo8uzx.jpg


y7x698sr.jpg


I guess that it was much shorter film back then, no 40min.
One can only speculate how much of that original film is left in the Ghosts we know. Most probbably the whole "Too Bad" segment was not a part in it.

Here is an interview with Mick Garris who was the director of the 1993 version:

[h=1]The Cold Case: Director Mick Garris on Michael Jackson's Forgotten Ghosts[/h]






Exhausted by endless replays of Thriller? Fed up with CNN treating Michael Jacksons's "ghost" as actual news ? This week, a special edition of The Cold Case talks to Mick Garris about 1997's Ghosts, the all-but-forgotten 38-minute film he created with Michael Jackson, the late Stan Winston and horror legend Stephen King.
In the 24/7 media meltdown that surrounded Michael Jackson's untimely death, it appeared that every clip of the superstar was unearthed, dusted off and replayed over and over. Even so, somehow, every story or tribute package led to 1983's Thriller, that game-changing 14-minute horror short that remains the highest-selling music video of all time. We should probably be grateful that the networks didn't have a working VCR and a copy of 1997's Ghosts, lest we be subject to an immediate overload of TV talking heads' endless analysis of what it meant and, God forbid, what it predicted.
To be fair, this 38-minute short film, not so much a sequel to Thriller than an operatic bookend, lends itself to such discussion. In it, Michael Jackson depicts himself as a misunderstood monster who's persecuted by those who love and hate him -- led by himself. The singer messes with his face, turns white, dies, is resurrected and moonwalks as a skeleton. Most poignantly, Jackson asks his fans and followers whether they've been scared and whether they've had fun. The answers are yes and yes.
Early in his career, Mick Garris, creator of the Masters Of Horror TV series and director of Stephen King adaptations such as The Shining and The Stand, and his wife Cynthia donned zombie make-up for Thriller. A decade later, Garris became part of the team that put Ghosts together. He spoke with Movieline recently about developing the project, working with his formidable creative partners and how Jackson battled monsterdom both onscreen and in real life.
First things first: How did you come to be a zombie in Thriller?
John Landis had already been a friend for several years. We actually met when I was a receptionist for the original Star Wars at an off-lot office at Universal. John's office was next door to mine when he was prepping Animal House. And Rick and his wife at the time, Elaine, had been very close friends and neighbors to me and Cynthia. So when they invited us, we came running. I was a hopeful writer then, doing publicity for studios and the like, just starting to get screenwriting jobs.
Was there the sense that you were seeing pop-culture history being made?
We knew we were doing something special, but had no idea just how special. We knew it was a much bigger scale than music videos at the time had been, and so much different than the usual 1980s performance things. But watching Michael come alive on that first night I was there was electrifying. I became a fan right there.
Did you become friends with Michael Jackson then?
We did not become friends at that point. Later on, when I was shooting The Stand, Stephen King and Michael put together a script for another scary music video -- one with huge scale, even compared to Thriller. King recommended me for it, and that's where I really met Michael on a one-to-one basis. We became friends through that experience.
What did you think Michael wanted to achieve with Ghosts?
Michael wanted to make the biggest, scariest music film ever. Well, I don't know that that's what happened; you can't really be scary in this context, but it's huge, the music and dancing are great, and it's quite the spectacle. And it definitely got its point across. That theme of the outcast stranger that he and King created was important, and stayed the focus through various incarnations.
How did you get involved, and how did the collaboration between you, Michael, Stan Winston and Stephen King work?
I was actually the original director. It was begun in 1993, and I worked with him throughout pre-production and two weeks of production. It shut down for three years before resuming under Stan Winston, who was doing the effects work when I was directing. I recommended him to finish shooting when it resumed, as I was about to shoot The Shining. So yeah, I was on set a lot. But I was not there when the production continued in 1996. I'd get midnight calls from Michael, who was so passionate about finishing it, making it special. He and Stan had become friends way back when they did The Wiz together.
In the beginning, he and Steve did the script together, and I wasn't really privy to what went on then. It was when it was greenlit that Michael and I and Stan would get together for hours on end, planning the complicated effects as well as the music and storytelling. But it started as something completely different. Nobody knows this, but it was originally going to be a video to promote Addams Family Values. In fact, Christina Ricci and the boy who played Pugsley were both in it. We shot for two weeks and never got to the musical numbers. It was very expensive and ambitious. And when the first so-called scandal happened, it was when we were shooting. Suddenly, Michael was out of the country, and the studio no longer wanted him to help promote that film.
What does it mean to you now that Stan and Michael are both gone?
It's incredibly sad, of course, and really tragic. Stan was a very talented and funny and friendly man. But I was closer to Michael, spent more time with him. It really breaks my heart to see what happened to him. He was always very fragile, had lots of trouble sleeping. He reminded me a lot of Don McLean's song about Vincent Van Gogh. The world can be mean, and Michael didn't have a mean bone in him. Very vulnerable and sweet. And what most people don't realize is how smart he was and especially how funny he could be. A very witty, explosively talented guy.
Did Michael hope Ghosts would break out as big as Thriller?
Michael always seemed to hope to make something that would be huge. He thought big, because his whole life seemed to be surrounded by magnitude. I don't know what his hopes were in terms of comparing it with Thriller, but I know he thought it would be very special.
Ghosts and Thriller see him as a charismatic, playful "monster". Do you think he kept having fun with that reputation, even when the media turned on him?
He was very playful with that image, though as the press got meaner, he was definitely hurt by it, and pulled back and became more reclusive. But though we were friends, it wasn't like I saw him all the time. A couple years could go by without seeing or speaking with one another, but when we did, we always had a good time.
Where were you when you heard he'd died? What did you immediately think and feel?
I was driving in my car when I heard on the radio that he'd been found unconscious and had been rushed to the hospital. I was stunned, of course, like everyone. Then, about an hour or so later, when I heard it rumored that he had died, I just couldn't believe it. It took a couple of days for it to sink in. Maybe it was inevitable, I don't know. I just know that he was fragile, sensitive, and an incredibly sweet and generous guy. It broke my heart, just like it broke the world's. And I really felt for his kids, who are terrific and unspoiled in a way you wouldn't imagine. At least, they were when I last saw them a couple of years ago.
As someone who knew him, what's your reaction to the 24/7 speculation and media coverage?
I don't know, I hate to speculate. I know he had his demons, fears, fragility. I really wasn't exposed to the drug usage or any of that stuff. It was not that intimate a relationship. All I know is that he was someone I liked a lot, and was privileged to know and work with, and I miss him. Even though I hadn't seen him in a couple of years, it always seemed like we'd be getting together again soon to talk about movies, and laugh and joke and have fun. It makes me so sad that it won't ever happen again.
Did you see the loneliness and sadness claimed to have been his constant companion?
One of my earliest meetings with him was in New York, where he had a penthouse apartment in the Trump Towers. He was so very lonely. He'd take me to the window and point down at Fifth Avenue below and tell me he'd give anything to be able to just walk down there and go into the shops, but he couldn't. I went out to visit him in Orlando, and was surprised to find that I was the only one, other than staff, that was around with him. There was nobody but us for a couple of days. I don't think he had a lot of close friends, people who didn't want something from him.
Your enduring memory of him will be...?
Making him laugh. When Michael laughed, when you got to him for more than just that giggle behind the hand, it was a sight to see. He just loved to laugh, and it was fun to tease him gently. Maybe one of my favorite memories was on the set of Ghosts; we'd finish a take, and if I wanted another, I'd put on Bullwinkle's voice and say, "This time for sure!" The first time, he just laughed and laughed and laughed. Then he'd keep asking, even after the good takes: "Mick, do Bullwinkle!" That's how I like to remember him.
Will Ghosts get a DVD release now?
I hope so. It was hugely expensive, and never released in the United States. He paid for it out of his own pocket, too. So I don't know who owns it. But I think people would love it. It changed a lot from the time that I worked on it to the time it was finished, but it's quite an accomplishment. I'd love to see it available. The only copy of it I have was one I came across in a music store in Hong Kong, on the old VCD format. It deserves better. ?

http://movieline.com/2009/07/14/the...-garris-on-michael-jacksons-forgotten-ghosts/
 
Michael's fb details says this:
Description
This is the official Michael Jackson Facebook page monitored and managed by the Estate of Michael Jackson with support of Sony Music Entertainment. Fans are encouraged to express the memories, join the conversation and express their thoughts and opinions in good taste and in accordance with respect for Michael Jackson and other fans alike. We strive to maintain a friendly atmosphere that is welcoming to all community members. That means keeping conversation on topic and within the scope of Michael Jackson as an entertainer and philanthropist. Profanity, degrading comments, off topic conversations will be removed and users subject to being banned.

In order to get past this massive ordeal, here is some contact details for people who wish to contact them to fix this problem:
https://twitter.com/MichaelJackson
https://twitter.com/MJonlineteam
Send message to michaeljacksonVEVO
http://www.youtube.com/user/michaeljacksonVEVO/about

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...-submit-messages-to-Estate-via-MJ-Online-Team



PS, I was thinking if estate or Sony has lurkers here, especially on this thread, I bet their reaction is something like this

images
 
I disagree with this. I can see nothing more "grown up" in Thriller than in Ghosts. In fact, it's actually the other way around IMO. Thriller is fun and entertaining but there's nothing really in depth in it. While Ghosts does have a message that goes beyond the "fun horror story" thing. To me Ghosts is actually more edgy and cool than Thriller. IMO the reason why it's not so much cult is simply that MJ was not as popular at the time it was released when he was when Thriller was released. For something to become cult the public needs to relate some personal experience to it and it needs to become an integral part of pop culture. Thriller has that factor due to MJ's immense popularity at the time and due to the fact that to the general public he could do no wrong at the time. Ghosts just does not have that advantage, but objectively to me it's a better film. I would even say Thriller is more popular because it's lighter and less deep than Ghosts. Much of the general public liked their MJ to be a fun, entertaining, dancing MJ, not really someone who criticizes society and holds up a mirror in front of it.

Well said. I too think that Ghosts is more for adults with message, whereas Thriller is more family fun with very famous dance sequence. Ghosts deserves more attention and should be another favourite halloween mini-movie along with Thriller. Maybe in the future, those two are released with making of footage around halloween?
 
I disagree with this. I can see nothing more "grown up" in Thriller than in Ghosts. In fact, it's actually the other way around IMO. Thriller is fun and entertaining but there's nothing really in depth in it. While Ghosts does have a message that goes beyond the "fun horror story" thing. To me Ghosts is actually more edgy and cool than Thriller. IMO the reason why it's not so much cult is simply that MJ was not as popular at the time it was released when he was when Thriller was released. For something to become cult the public needs to relate some personal experience to it and it needs to become an integral part of pop culture. Thriller has that factor due to MJ's immense popularity at the time and due to the fact that to the general public he could do no wrong at the time. Ghosts just does not have that advantage, but objectively to me it's a better film. I would even say Thriller is more popular because it's lighter and less deep than Ghosts. Much of the general public liked their MJ to be a fun, entertaining, dancing MJ, not really someone who criticizes society and holds up a mirror in front of it.


You're right. There are more levels of depth to Ghosts than to Thriller ...IF one is ready to see them. But looking at it unreflected like the masses do, Ghosts foremostly appears as soft childrens entertainment. All the close up shots of the "scared" kids etc... they seem to be the center of the whole piece, and that's nothing too sexy for average adults.

Of course that's just one factor of several in the lack of success of this short film. I agree that the momentum factor is the more important one. It always plays a major role when comparing anything post-Thriller to Thriller.


Here is an interview with Mick Garris who was the director of the 1993 version:
http://movieline.com/2009/07/14/the...-garris-on-michael-jacksons-forgotten-ghosts/


Great read, thanks! So the 1993 film wasn't finished at all.
 
Last edited:
The first filming goes back to 1993 i think. At least thats when there was supposed to be a Michael Jackson single and videoclip released for a song called "Adam's Groove" for the soundtrack of the second Addams Family film. The single was already in music distributors lists for upcoming releases, but then, when the big scandal hit, it was all cancelled.

The video must have been pretty much finished, as Michael was long away on tour by then.

Rare recently surfaced screenshots from the 93 short film:
qfwo8uzx.jpg


y7x698sr.jpg


I guess that it was much shorter film back then, no 40min.
One can only speculate how much of that original film is left in the Ghosts we know. Most probbably the whole "Too Bad" segment was not a part in it.

The 1995 40min Version is pretty much the same as the later officially released. Biggest difference was the audio track... that only included "Too Bad" in a super extended version (beats) all through the film. That was a little boring, so it makes sense that they edited the songs "Ghosts" and "Is It Scary" into it.


Man i love this topic... so many question-marks lol ...this and the unreleased 22min version of the TWYMMF short film. :D Mind-boggling...

Thanks for the info. But in that photo he looks different to me than in the released film (his hair is different, clothes and he's skinnier). I think they re-shot all of his parts in 1995.

So, you are saying that the video was completed in 1995? So that would be after he finished filming Scream? Guessing based on the length of his hair.
 
I wonder what was the main storyline like in 1993 since in the final version the Sneddon-ish mayor is an essential part of the movie. Here's your in depth grown up theme, btw. It has a lot of saying, criticism and a message in it. If you can't see it you totally missed the point of Ghosts.
 
I wonder what was the main storyline like in 1993 since in the final version the Sneddon-ish mayor is an essential part of the movie. Here's your in depth grown up theme, btw. It has a lot of saying, criticism and a message in it. If you can't see it you totally missed the point of Ghosts.

Probably the Sneddon-figure was not yet in it but like Mick Garris said:

That theme of the outcast stranger that he and King created was important, and stayed the focus through various incarnations.

So I guess the theme of society's superficial judgement and fear of anything different was already there in 1993.
 
Yeah that's what I thought cause that's what Ghosts is all about - after all Michael was facing the "society's superficial judgement" as you so smartly put it, way before the allagations (Leave Me Alone\Why You Wanna Trip On Me, etc) but still, my guess is that the Ghosts as we know it is a bit more edgy and sharp. Don't you think?

btw- did it say if Michael played two roles in the early version too?
 
If anyone has indeed sent an email or has chosen another more direct method

I don't think anyone sent an email, I sure didn't and won't. This thread has been filled with "if you have an issue, contact them - yourself".
 
I think the ~40min length is also part of the problem. Too long for a egular play in music TV (with commercials, that would be like a 1 hour MJ special), too short for regular TV which are used to show full length movies. So it always can only drop only into the special interest slots.*

Another problem is that i think is that it's too much of a Disney style childrens movie... nothing as edgy, cool and something for "grown ups" as Thriller. Not a good basis to become "cult".


--------------------------

yeah thats some good points. im gonna get shot here but some of it is pretty cheesey.

germany was always a big support base for mj. back during and pre history we had the early stages of sky t.v in the uk and you would get the german channels such as ZDF etc. there was alot of mj things shown promo and what not. the munich shows etc so im not surprised ghosts got alot of promo. it just seemed to me to be a waste but as u say it does fall into a difficult bracket. i just wished more of the gen public got to see it as the dancing and special effects look amazing almost 20 years later. my comment earlier about the mtv v.j kinda some it up to me.
 
btw- did it say if Michael played two roles in the early version too?

I only know what I copied and pasted here in that interview. He did not mention anything about two roles. If there wasn't a Sneddon-like figure initially what would be the other role? On the other hand the Addams Family kids were in it, so I guess it had a different plot.
 
OnirMJ;4053901 said:
So, you are saying that the video was completed in 1995? So that would be after he finished filming Scream? Guessing based on the length of his hair.

It couldn't have been be finished in 95 because Debbie testified during AEG trial this"
Chang then showed a photo of Jackson, in makeup for his short film “Ghost,” riding on the back of her Harley-Davidson motorcycle. Rowe said she told Jackson and he was so excited, he ran onto the tarmac of the airport where they were filming “Ghost.” (AP) Chang showed Rowe and MJ in a Harley motorcycle, he was with make-up on. He always had crews with him to document stuff, Rowe said. She took him for a ride and took him to a tarmac and said I need to talk to you. "I said you're going to be a dad," Rowe said, sobbing. "He was so excited, he ran out in the tarmac screaming."

Ps, photo of MJ in his costume 96
http://s989.photobucket.com/user/orthodiva/media/MJ/debbiemjdisguiseonbike.jpg.html

Note, Junior was born in February 13, 1997, so you can calculate it was around mid 96 and they were still filming it.
 
Last edited:
Here is an interview with Mick Garris who was the director of the 1993 version:



http://movieline.com/2009/07/14/the...-garris-on-michael-jacksons-forgotten-ghosts/

This article proves that it's impossible that in 1995 were any screenings or any 1995 version. Like he said "But I was not there when the production continued in 1996." So the new version is filmed in 1996, like I thought so.

Also about 1993 version - "We shot for two weeks and never got to the musical numbers." They never got to musical numbers - so it's just acting, no dancing, singing, no Ghosts the song. It was far away from being completed, like someone here suggested.
 
Last edited:
Respect77, Ivy, I and others spoke our grievance and you replied with your complaints about the nature of the posts. I would say those complaints are not particularly effective. You also glossed over instances where complaints voiced in MJJC threads were heard and resulted in action by Estate/Sony. That is a positive for the forum.

Ivy, please pay attention to the “if” operator that starts the fragmented sentence you posted. Neither of us are aware of what any fan has done outside of this thread regarding this. What we do is there are MJ fans who will voice their issues using whatever platform is available to them which fortunately, includes MJJC threads. I personally support that regardless of who the fault maker is or how minor one considers the error. I would also say it is a positive that Estate/Sony lurkers frequent MJJC threads as compared to other fan forums. That is the larger view. You may feel otherwise and that is fine.

Good to know the reasoning behind the four minute clip is not being challenged anymore.

respect77;4053872 said:
IMO the reason why it's not so much cult is simply that MJ was not as popular at the time it was released when he was when Thriller was released. For something to become cult the public needs to relate some personal experience to it and it needs to become an integral part of pop culture. Thriller has that factor due to MJ's immense popularity at the time and due to the fact that to the general public he could do no wrong at the time.

I disagree. I am unsure where this information came from but, it is not true.
 
Last edited:
I've heard it was supposed to be on the Adam's Family soundtrack, but never knew they actually started filming it with Christina Ricci etc. So sad it had to be cancelled, thanks to nasty greedy people.
 
Where can I find that version of Ghosts with just 2 Bad in it? Is it available in 2000 Watts? Any links to share? Thanks!
 
OMG, they misspelled Ghosts?!?!?! What are we gonna do now?!?!? :bugeyed

Ha ha- when I read they misspelled "Ghost" I literally went back to see if they had maybe transposed letters or something I didn't realize until later that it just needed an "s" at the end. You can always count on drama here - Now if they finally officially release this in blu-ray/dvd and the title is GHOST, then we have a reason to gripe, but this.... . :smilerolleyes:
 
That was a GREAT interview with Mike Garris, the original director. Confirms a lot of what I thought about Ghosts. Here in the States, all I saw was a few news shows and pix in the paper of Michael and Stan at the Cannes Film Festival and then poof gone. Never saw it at the theatres. Never saw it for sale. Never saw it on TV. I'm actually more than a little jealous that people abroad actually got to see this film on TV and theatres, and buy it too.

So I guess when they said selected cities in the US, they meant LA and New York-probably in December, in order to qualify for Oscar consideration. Like they did with Thriller, like they did with Spike's doc, and with so many films here.

Finally found it a few years ago on You Tube. And just happened to watch the dance routine a few days before this Facebook post.

What I would like to see them do with "Ghosts" one day is sign a deal with a major network and show it every year around Halloween-a la "It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown." And these days, there are so many commercials in 60 minute shows, the 40 minute movie is just right. I'd make it a 90 minute special with the behind the scenes. But all of that needs its own thread.
 

Thanks!

from Steven King's article:
It's 1993, ...

The film shot for three weeks, then shut down for three years.

Filming on the Michael Jackson Ghosts video recommenced as abruptly as it had stopped. Mick remembers getting a call from Michael in 1996: ''Mick, it's gonna happen! We gotta believe it's gonna happen!''


Ok, so it was 1996. (1995 was just a vague memory on my part... it's a long time ago i was into the details of all this stuff, and whether it was 95 or 96 wasn't that important to me.)

The "Black & White" MJ magazin at some time during HIStory era reported that there had been a few screenings of Ghosts together with Steven Kings movie "Thinner" in the USA. But that it all went down without big attention.

edit... i just had another look. It was in the January 1997 issue.
They reported that Ghosts had been running for one week "until 31. October" (1996) in combo with Thinner, and that everyone wondered why there was no promotion for it at all, barely any fans knowning about it etc. HIStory promo in the USA had already pretty much died at that point i think, so this fits in. As barbee0715 suggested, these rather secret Ghosts screening might indeed have also been just as alibi for potential Oscar nominations. Something that could only work in pre-internet and pre smart phone times. :)

The version shown there was definitly the "Too Bad"-only version. First time i saw the film was a shaky hand camera recording from one of these screenings.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info. But in that photo he looks different to me than in the released film (his hair is different, clothes and he's skinnier).

Well, thats the exciting thing about it. :)
These are, to my knowledge, the only images released/leaked from the 1993 version so far.


So, you are saying that the video was completed in 1995? So that would be after he finished filming Scream? Guessing based on the length of his hair.

I meant 1996.

But his hair lenght doesn't always tell much anyway. He worked a lot with extentions / artificial hair etc. For example, shortly after he was shooting TDCAU in brazil with the partly short-cut "hair", he appeared in Prague for the start of the HIStory tour with his classic long hair.
 
Last edited:
I meant 1996.

But his hair lenght doesn't always tell much anyway. He worked a lot with extentions / artificial hair etc. For example, shortly after he was shooting TDCAU in brazil with the partly short-cut "hair", he appeared in Prague for the start of the HIStory tour with his classic long hair.

Yeah, I would say Ghosts was filmed after They Don't Care About Us and before Stranger In Moscow. Because in the Making Of Ghosts his hair looks similar to TDCAU. He probably wear some kind of hair extensions during the actual filming of Ghosts and during HIStory Tour. During Ghosts rehearsals his hair is shorter and straight.
 
This was funny:

"On another occasion, he called my wife, wanting the phone number for wherever I was that day. She gave it to him. Michael called back five minutes later, on the verge of tears. He hadn't had a pencil, he said, so he'd tried to write the number on the carpet with his finger, and he couldn't read it. My wife gave him the number again. Michael thanked her profusely...but never called me."
 
That was a GREAT interview with Mike Garris, the original director. Confirms a lot of what I thought about Ghosts. Here in the States, all I saw was a few news shows and pix in the paper of Michael and Stan at the Cannes Film Festival and then poof gone. Never saw it at the theatres. Never saw it for sale. Never saw it on TV. I'm actually more than a little jealous that people abroad actually got to see this film on TV and theatres, and buy it too.

So I guess when they said selected cities in the US, they meant LA and New York-probably in December, in order to qualify for Oscar consideration. Like they did with Thriller, like they did with Spike's doc, and with so many films here.

Finally found it a few years ago on You Tube. And just happened to watch the dance routine a few days before this Facebook post.

What I would like to see them do with "Ghosts" one day is sign a deal with a major network and show it every year around Halloween-a la "It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown." And these days, there are so many commercials in 60 minute shows, the 40 minute movie is just right. I'd make it a 90 minute special with the behind the scenes. But all of that needs its own thread.
It played in 10 theaters in the USA. I saw it at a theater near Washington DC.
 
It played in 10 theaters in the USA. I saw it at a theater near Washington DC.

How did you learn about it back then? Or did you just stumble over it?
Do you remember if there was any promo (posters or anything) at the cinemas? Anything special?
Still got the cinema ticket maybe? :)
 
How did you learn about it back then? Or did you just stumble over it?
Do you remember if there was any promo (posters or anything) at the cinemas? Anything special?
Still got the cinema ticket maybe? :)
I learned about it from a website. I believe the MJIFC. Michael Jackson internet fan club. I was so happy to see that it was playing in a theater near me. If I didn't have internet access I never would have known about it. At the theater there wasn't a poster for it. However there were flyers at the theater advertising it. I still have a few of those flyers somewhere. I'm not sure if I still have the ticket. It was a long time ago but I'm thinking maybe the ticket didn't say Ghosts on it so I just threw it away. I'm not sure on that!
 
Back
Top