Jackson Unreleased 69
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2023
- Messages
- 123
- Points
- 28
And I will paid the restSi 5 personnes paient 50 $, cela fait 250 $ et non 450 $.
And I will paid the restSi 5 personnes paient 50 $, cela fait 250 $ et non 450 $.
At this point in time, only a true wav or flac of the Bernie CD would be worth that much.$450 for a song that has already leaked, how pathetic lmfao. I would get that if it was for an unheard song but this is just greedy and unreasonable thinking.
I wouldn't pay more than what I would pay for a single single track (lossless) at Qobuz storeAt this point in time, only a true wav or flac of the Bernie CD would be worth that much.
From all the story, nope. It's the mp3 file people were circulating in its glorious 60kbps quality.Would it be a higher quality version than the one leaked?
So basically the leaked file quality except it in the normal speed and full song?From all the story, nope. It's the mp3 file people were circulating in its glorious 60kbps quality.
Kinda, yes.So basically the leaked file quality except it in the normal speed and full song?
what do you mean by kinda?Kinda, yes.
From what I could understand of the situation, the leaked file (besides being cut and sped up) was reconverted from this mp3 file. If that's true, the mp3 should be slightly better.what do you mean by kinda?
Non, c'est la vraie version Mp3 qui était sur Ebay in HQD'après ce que j'ai pu comprendre de la situation, le fichier divulgué (en plus d'avoir été coupé et accéléré) a été reconverti à partir de ce fichier mp3. Si c'est vrai, le mp3 devrait être légèrement meilleur.
Il n'y a pas de mp3 HQ. De nombreuses personnes ont affirmé que le fichier mp3 proposé sur eBay était un fichier de 60 kbps.Non, c'est la vraie version Mp3 qui était sur Ebay in HQ
We're getting it soondon't we already have the song? What more do we need from this record in particular?
Kinda is but the leaked version is in awful audio quality.I get headache hearing it…especially with headphones.$450 for a song that has already leaked, how pathetic lmfao. I would get that if it was for an unheard song but this is just greedy and unreasonable thinking.
Nope it is 96kbpsIl n'y a pas de mp3 HQ. De nombreuses personnes ont affirmé que le fichier mp3 proposé sur eBay était un fichier de 60 kbps.
Still, 96kbps is LQ, not HQ.The mp3 version is 96kbps Kai have the files
What counts as HQ?Still, 96kbps is LQ, not HQ.
If you ask me, original true lossless.What counts as HQ?
Can’t you use AI to improve/ enhance the audio quality? Has anyone tried this on the original leak? Might be a better option than spending $450, just sayin’If you ask me, original true lossless.
Being fair, I'd say any mp3 from 256kbps to 320kbps should be good enough.
Well, the claim people are using to support this whole thing is real: the leak is missing a minute of the song. Better to stick with the best reconstruction.Can’t you use AI to improve/ enhance the audio quality? Has anyone tried this on the original leak? Might be a better option than spending $450, just sayin’
Really like 30-40 secsWell, the claim people are using to support this whole thing is real: the leak is missing a minute of the song. Better to stick with the best reconstruction.
I guarantee you in April the track will be leaked uneditedWell, the claim people are using to support this whole thing is real: the leak is missing a minute of the song. Better to stick with the best reconstruction.