Latest on MJJC

Randy Jackson pays for little girl's life-saving treatment

janena said:
Who knows what the story is behind the bear....mayby we should just ask Randy instead of jumping to conclusions...

I have to admit that the 2 pictures (of the bear in the hospital and at FL) made me do :bugeyed:doh::blink::hysterical: for a moment though (lol, sorry...my sence of humor is a bit off).
Click to expand...

My sentiments exactly! Thank you! :clapping:
 
I just have to say a few things in this thread.
As mentioned in the Forest Lawn thread, the $3 charge is not something new. It has always been there and it is for any gift left for any person buried there. So the idea they are making extra money off of MJ is not well founded.

Alot of people here must be lovers of Robin Hood. The idea that "there are so many gifts there so I'll just take this one and give it to someone who doesn't have one" doesn't make the one who took it any less of a thief simply because of who he gave it to.

Thirdly, it doesn't matter if it was going to be dumped. Let's say you have a TV that you are going to dump and buy a new one. you come home from work and the TV is gone. The thief leaves a note saying "You were going to throw it away anyway so I prematurely relieved you of it". Are you not still going to be pissed. UNTIL you threw it away, it is still yours and no one has the right to come and take for any reason.

Lastly, the gifts at Forest Lawn are meant for MJ. They are a testament to his fans' love for him. Why do you think it was an issue that his mausoleum not be bare. And why so many ordered flowers to put there when they thought it was empty. The gifts are not only for Mj to enjoy but for fellow fans to enjoy and to let all of us understand and remember how much we love Mj and he loved us. Who knows how many fans saw that bear and were uplifted seeing it sit there as a testament to MJ. The fan who put it there was giving of themselves and their money as a physical testament to how much they loved MJ. Who is anyone to take it from that place prematurely?

You can spend $60,000 on a surgery, but you cannot shell out another $10 to buy the girl a bear. But you have to take it from your dead brother's mausoleum???? And some people are not outraged by this. But try to reason that it was garbage??? I'm sorry. But the garbage is in the back. What is in front and visible is still Michaels'. I find this disgusting.

Let me also say this. My sister is buried in a place that comes through regularly and cleans up the flowers people leave for their family members so the place always looks fresh. I would be PO'd if I found out someone took some flowers I left for her to give to someone else just because they would eventually be thrown out. And any of you here, know very well, you would be upset also.

Why is it different with MJ?? And why are people coming down on fans who take issue with this? I am truly sickened.
 
Well I agree it seems tacky on the surface but we don't know the details.
 
there is nothing to know about there is nothing to defend, even hypocrisy and defending should have a limit, the repeated behavior displayed is indefendable, no matter which way ppl spin it, point blank.
 
ginvid said:
I just have to say a few things in this thread.
As mentioned in the Forest Lawn thread, the $3 charge is not something new. It has always been there and it is for any gift left for any person buried there. So the idea they are making extra money off of MJ is not well founded.

Alot of people here must be lovers of Robin Hood. The idea that "there are so many gifts there so I'll just take this one and give it to someone who doesn't have one" doesn't make the one who took it any less of a thief simply because of who he gave it to.

Thirdly, it doesn't matter if it was going to be dumped. Let's say you have a TV that you are going to dump and buy a new one. you come home from work and the TV is gone. The thief leaves a note saying "You were going to throw it away anyway so I prematurely relieved you of it". Are you not still going to be pissed. UNTIL you threw it away, it is still yours and no one has the right to come and take for any reason.

Lastly, the gifts at Forest Lawn are meant for MJ. They are a testament to his fans' love for him. Why do you think it was an issue that his mausoleum not be bare. And why so many ordered flowers to put there when they thought it was empty. The gifts are not only for Mj to enjoy but for fellow fans to enjoy and to let all of us understand and remember how much we love Mj and he loved us. Who knows how many fans saw that bear and were uplifted seeing it sit there as a testament to MJ. The fan who put it there was giving of themselves and their money as a physical testament to how much they loved MJ. Who is anyone to take it from that place prematurely?

You can spend $60,000 on a surgery, but you cannot shell out another $10 to buy the girl a bear. But you have to take it from your dead brother's mausoleum???? And some people are not outraged by this. But try to reason that it was garbage??? I'm sorry. But the garbage is in the back. What is in front and visible is still Michaels'. I find this disgusting.

Let me also say this. My sister is buried in a place that comes through regularly and cleans up the flowers people leave for their family members so the place always looks fresh. I would be PO'd if I found out someone took some flowers I left for her to give to someone else just because they would eventually be thrown out. And any of you here, know very well, you would be upset also.

Why is it different with MJ?? And why are people coming down on fans who take issue with this? I am truly sickened.
Click to expand...
This is a EXCELLENT post!!.:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
ginvid said:
I just have to say a few things in this thread.
As mentioned in the Forest Lawn thread, the $3 charge is not something new. It has always been there and it is for any gift left for any person buried there. So the idea they are making extra money off of MJ is not well founded.

Alot of people here must be lovers of Robin Hood. The idea that "there are so many gifts there so I'll just take this one and give it to someone who doesn't have one" doesn't make the one who took it any less of a thief simply because of who he gave it to.

Thirdly, it doesn't matter if it was going to be dumped. Let's say you have a TV that you are going to dump and buy a new one. you come home from work and the TV is gone. The thief leaves a note saying "You were going to throw it away anyway so I prematurely relieved you of it". Are you not still going to be pissed. UNTIL you threw it away, it is still yours and no one has the right to come and take for any reason.

Lastly, the gifts at Forest Lawn are meant for MJ. They are a testament to his fans' love for him. Why do you think it was an issue that his mausoleum not be bare. And why so many ordered flowers to put there when they thought it was empty. The gifts are not only for Mj to enjoy but for fellow fans to enjoy and to let all of us understand and remember how much we love Mj and he loved us. Who knows how many fans saw that bear and were uplifted seeing it sit there as a testament to MJ. The fan who put it there was giving of themselves and their money as a physical testament to how much they loved MJ. Who is anyone to take it from that place prematurely?

You can spend $60,000 on a surgery, but you cannot shell out another $10 to buy the girl a bear. But you have to take it from your dead brother's mausoleum???? And some people are not outraged by this. But try to reason that it was garbage??? I'm sorry. But the garbage is in the back. What is in front and visible is still Michaels'. I find this disgusting.

Let me also say this. My sister is buried in a place that comes through regularly and cleans up the flowers people leave for their family members so the place always looks fresh. I would be PO'd if I found out someone took some flowers I left for her to give to someone else just because they would eventually be thrown out. And any of you here, know very well, you would be upset also.

Why is it different with MJ?? And why are people coming down on fans who take issue with this? I am truly sickened.
Click to expand...
Im truly amazed by this post of urs and agree totatlly
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top