elusive moonwalker
Guests
by randy going on about the spellings/versions of the kids name on the will hes basically saying that mj would not have left money to his own kids. otherwsie whats he trying to imply? it makes no sense at all as normal.
Madoff was a crock stealing money from his clients. BP appears to not give two craps about the mess they made how can you put AEG in that category? AEG is a multi billion dollar company they had no reason to force Michael to do anything. Go take a look at what they own they dwarf Michael. They would have no reason to force Michael to do anything. When you think about it AEG gave Michael a chance and from what we saw and from we know he was making the most of it. All Joe and others have is a lot of empty words. I go by what I see and what I know show me proof that AEG was doing this. Words are just that words without proof we know that from 05. I think that people just are having a hard time with the fact that Michael was killed because of someone else's errors. If we were to find out others were involved in how Michael died it would somehow make us feel better. However the facts right now are someone screwed up and it cost Michael his life
by randy going on about the spellings/versions of the kids name on the will hes basically saying that mj would not have left money to his own kids. otherwsie whats he trying to imply? it makes no sense at all as normal.
I don't get what Randy is trying to say. That because the kids names are wrong that means someone else wrote the will or what?
your opinion is your opinion...especially about the part where you say AEG dwarfs Michael. sometimes i think there is more preconceived notion than fact stating.
if u wanna see AEG the way you see it..that's u. but that's ur opinion.
i don't think u knew about Madoff till he was revealed. and BP was, and still is a giant. obviously, that means nothing.
if Randy Jackson ends up saying it, will you believe? no. you have your ideas about AEG, and nothing can change them...even if it turns out like you don't want.
And this also goes to you
Exactly Sloride. From what I can gather in some quarters (and I know this is probably not the forum for this), the errors in the children's names and the NYC/LA discrepancy are being used to promote the idea that not only was the will/trust written by Branca (and possibly McClain) but they inserted themselves as executors and are thus now profitinghandsomely from the currentsituation. In other words the decision
to leave the money to MJ3, Katherine & charities isn't being questioned so much as
the choice of who was going to control this
vast empire, surprise surprise
:smilerolleyes:
and who else MJ could gave chose? It's not like MJ would have picked anyone in his family.
by randy going on about the spellings/versions of the kids name on the will hes basically saying that mj would not have left money to his own kids. otherwsie whats he trying to imply? it makes no sense at all as normal.
Basically the issue relating to the conpiracy theorists is not MJ wouldn't leave the children his money, it is that he would not have Branca as executor controlling his Estate, because he sacked him...
I don't subscribe to this conspiracy theory but I think I have the feel of what they 'believe' (anyone who follows that theory feel free to correct me)..
I think the conpiracy theory being implied is that because of the mistakes such as the childrens' names, and the error in the location (LA when he was actually in NY on that date) the 2002 Will is fake, written by someone else - the Branca/executors (idk?) and has been in the hands of Branca. This is why we have Oxman with his letter from MJ which sacks Branca and asks him to return any documents, so (I think?) they're saying he couldn't have had the 'real' Will.
Then they say there should be a more recent Will as Michael updated it every 4 or 5 years (I don't know where this information came from)...they believe this 'missing Will' had different executors named (as Branca had been sacked) and has been destroyed.
Basically the issue relating to the conpiracy theorists is not MJ wouldn't leave the children his money, it is that he would not have Branca as executor controlling his Estate, because he sacked him...
Oxman has been going on about when Michael hired a private investigating firm to investigate Branca (and others) and some offshore accounts to see if he was stealing money along with Motolla (apparently the reason MJ sacked Branca is not because he was sure of any money stealing but a precaution because of the offshore accounts, and I think because he was representing Sony too which isn't allowed).
Though I don't really see what difference it makes, because from what I can see the executors can't just take Michael's money.. except for their wage. Unless they believe there is illegal activity going on.
Again, I don't believe this, just trying to explain the 'conspiracy' theory.
If this isn't allowed here mods can delete it.
June 17 (or 16 - I do not remember the day but was in June.), 2009. Strange that the document hiring Branca, not leaked...... yet.And from what I understand, MJ rehired Branca a few weeks before he died.
June 17 (or 16 - I do not remember the day but was in June.), 2009. Strange that the document hiring Branca, not leaked...... yet.