Tygger
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2012
- Messages
- 2,316
- Points
- 0
and there we have it from AP
Outside the presence of the jury, the judge overseeing the case refused to allow lawyers for Jackson's mother to amend their lawsuit and add a negligence claim based on testimony presented during the trial.
Read more: http://www.ctvnews.ca/entertainment...-anesthetic-for-sleep-1.1435155#ixzz2dZutFTSe
I am fine with that decision as it seemed redundant. I believe the plaintiffs' lawyers were hedging their bet however, their evidence has shown it is more than likely AEG hired the doctor. AEG can show it was more than likely they did not however, they have not and do not seem the slight bit interested in discussing that in this trial. The plaintiffs proved without a shadow of doubt that if there was an alleged hiring, there was negligence.
It is very suspicious that no outlet discussed the conversations between the judge and the lawyers on Tuesday before Levounis testified however, AP is reporting the judge's ruling on Thursday.
As for Lee, she is no more suspicious than any other medical persons in Michael's life in my view. Any treatment she gave Michael did not kill him.
Last edited: