smoothlugar
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- Messages
- 484
- Points
- 0
Re: Open General discussion - Katherine Jackson vs AEG (daily threads merged)
Firstly, thank you to all of you for the updates and for the discussion.
I agree completely!
I get your point and I agree about the overused word d.a. used by his family and lawyers (BO) for the last 4 years (particularly while the criminal process was on), however i don't agree with the words in bold: EVEN IF what you say would happen, STILL that expression in bold would denote inhumanity and insentivity to a serious suffering, (particularly that BUT).
P.S: Sorry if my last point is not well explained, but when I read the last bolded words, I felt strong anger, because it made me remember EXCELLENT human beings I knew that died due to that, and I would never never say of them that, if any, I would complain of the enablers.
Firstly, thank you to all of you for the updates and for the discussion.
Addiction is brought on by the Jacksons to say that AEG should have suspected the doctor because of Michael's past problems, and because of AEG's experience of "doctors feelgood" on tours.
I'm not so sure addiction is the central part of the trial, it's a part of it, and we'll see how "central" it becomes. It certainly is the most "spectacular" for certain media.
I think the point is was AEG negligent in hiring Murray, and were they supposed to supervise him, and if so why, how, when (particularly when they saw weird symptoms the last week IMO...).
It's not denying it, from my point of view anyway. I agree that it is very common and not shameful at all. My problem with all this addiction talk in this thread is that I don't think it was the case in 2009, at least before Murray came into the picture. (...)
Murray , and maybe other doctors, lied to him and betrayed their patient. This can't be taken out of the picture, it's essential, and that is one of the important issue of this trial, not really Michael's past addiction and how he dealt with it. Murray is the doctor and he lied to everybody, probably including Michael and AEG.
Back in 2008, I don't think AEG would have made a deal with Michael if they had suspected anything. I think the point is how they reacted when they saw something was wrong, and when they should have suspected that something was wrong IMO.
I agree completely!
His so called family is painting Michael as helpless addict that couldn't do anything to himself, using drugs since 90's etc. I can only imagine the future books written (re R Sullivan) about MJ, and this so called family happily provides ammunion to those books. It would be useless to fight these future's Sullivan's as they will say, "but family said it is true".
Yes sure he was great entertainer, or the greatest, but he was junkie.
I fear that is what we are going to read from history books.
I get your point and I agree about the overused word d.a. used by his family and lawyers (BO) for the last 4 years (particularly while the criminal process was on), however i don't agree with the words in bold: EVEN IF what you say would happen, STILL that expression in bold would denote inhumanity and insentivity to a serious suffering, (particularly that BUT).
P.S: Sorry if my last point is not well explained, but when I read the last bolded words, I felt strong anger, because it made me remember EXCELLENT human beings I knew that died due to that, and I would never never say of them that, if any, I would complain of the enablers.