Re: Official Message From The Estate Of Michael Jackson To The Fans
I'll be honest and say that I'm shocked to see how some people responds to this statement.
one day we want to ask the people that Michael worked with what they think about it, the next day when we hear their opinions we suddenly chose to discredit them.
one day we ask Gaz for a statement from the estate, the minute he delivers what we want, we claim it's fake.
seriously people?
so what this statement tells us is actually that we were all correct - it's part Michael and it's not part Michael.
about 3T : I actually like them as a person but still I have some questions.
Yes they worked with Michael but the question is how much? We know that their album had 2-3 songs with Michael on them but how much time they spent in the studio with Michael? Honestly all the other people listed has spent more time working with Michael then 3T.
Plus some people accept what 3T claims to be the absolute undebatable truth but they fail to see that they don't actually provide any solid concrete proof either. They say that "they know their uncle" and that statement is no concrete than any other person's opinion.
About Rodney Jenkins = yes he has worked with Michael and voiced his opinion but is his opinion based on the actual raw vocals or the finished song streaming ? You know that makes a difference.
just to be clear that's still fraud. I know that there's a "sony can do what ever they want and get away with it" belief but that's not quite true. I'll give you the alternative scenario
- someone (such as 3T) sues Sony for fraud (putting fake vocals)
- they ask court to send the materials for independent examination (as sony's own examination could be biased and the judge would agree)
- judge chooses their own random forensic expert and get the results
- if the results do not match that would be fraud on both accounts and falsification of the documents.
If that's the case (that the vocals are fake and sony created the reports) the wise thing would be to take it court not twitter IMO.
Yes I think so too. There's no point in arguing about it IMO. It's just a personal decision now to whether buy the album or not.
I'll be honest and say that I'm shocked to see how some people responds to this statement.
one day we want to ask the people that Michael worked with what they think about it, the next day when we hear their opinions we suddenly chose to discredit them.
one day we ask Gaz for a statement from the estate, the minute he delivers what we want, we claim it's fake.
seriously people?
so what this statement tells us is actually that we were all correct - it's part Michael and it's not part Michael.
about 3T : I actually like them as a person but still I have some questions.
Yes they worked with Michael but the question is how much? We know that their album had 2-3 songs with Michael on them but how much time they spent in the studio with Michael? Honestly all the other people listed has spent more time working with Michael then 3T.
Plus some people accept what 3T claims to be the absolute undebatable truth but they fail to see that they don't actually provide any solid concrete proof either. They say that "they know their uncle" and that statement is no concrete than any other person's opinion.
About Rodney Jenkins = yes he has worked with Michael and voiced his opinion but is his opinion based on the actual raw vocals or the finished song streaming ? You know that makes a difference.
What concrete evidence do we have? Only a MASSIVE corporation with more money than sense, who could easy bribe and create biased reports to dismiss any challenges they face.
just to be clear that's still fraud. I know that there's a "sony can do what ever they want and get away with it" belief but that's not quite true. I'll give you the alternative scenario
- someone (such as 3T) sues Sony for fraud (putting fake vocals)
- they ask court to send the materials for independent examination (as sony's own examination could be biased and the judge would agree)
- judge chooses their own random forensic expert and get the results
- if the results do not match that would be fraud on both accounts and falsification of the documents.
If that's the case (that the vocals are fake and sony created the reports) the wise thing would be to take it court not twitter IMO.
Fans can choose to buy the album, or not buy it. I guess that's where we are now?
Yes I think so too. There's no point in arguing about it IMO. It's just a personal decision now to whether buy the album or not.