moonwalker5885
Proud Member
Michael was a very wise man!!!
Executors of the will. the WILL
WE AND CNN...know NOTHING about the Trust.
So lets not be Tabloid Junkies....and CNN can be really Tabloid ALOT.
They made me so furious.
I had to turn off thier channel and turn up Disc 4 in TUC
Ok, CNN is saying Michael's 2 lawyers are the Executors of his will and get control of the estate. This means they can do whatever they want with the estate, money, whatever Jackson has.
jamgirl, the Trust is cash, not personal affects.
Personal affects are things no one would want but close family.
Some stuff will get thrown away socks, undies, old clothes, broken dishes etc.
Other things will get passed down to his kids.
My Grandma had a will with a trust built in it.
I was MAD when I heard it. Michael gave it all away and these people can sell the catalog for one cent and screw everything up. I'm really mad. I'm hopping it's fake. I don't think he would be that:doh: to give the Pieces-of $h!t that kind of control. He can't say not one of his blood worth the trust. These people can do whatever they want, the are gods! Maybe that's what I needed to hear to move on.
Well CNN also said a judge ordered these 2 lawyers and Katherine to come to a hearing, I think, on June 6th to talk about all this mess.
And it was written before that trial mess started so i wouldn't be surprised if he wanted to be buried at his beloved Neverland under his little giving tree where he used to sit and think and write beautiful music.
I've loved Michael and have respected his private decision and all as a human being, a friend. I've been a wise member here since 2004 and never let emotion causing me to be overacted. I must say the following: If Michael's two lawyers are indeed declared Gods and Executors of his will and get full control of his estate to do whatever they want with the estate, money, etc... then Michael should be remembered only for making that decision.
Ok, CNN is saying Michael's 2 lawyers are the Executors of his will and get control of the estate. This means they can do whatever they want with the estate, money, whatever Jackson has.
I hope Michael's mother can fight to get appointed as teh third executor, then she can delegate her responsibilities to Londell.
This way, she gets consulted concerning all business deals, album releases, use of Michael's image rights and belongings
It also ensures Branca SonyATV and other assets.
It's not right that Branca set this up without letting Michael have anyone else have a say about his career management after death, which virtually enables Branca to become "Michael" as the chief executor.
Londell is a good lawyer and can pursue this in court or in negotiations.
Also, they can bring up two things to challenge BRanca
This was drawn up in 2002, but a lot has happened between then and now.
There were those who during the trial sought to force Michael to sell his share of SonyATV, and Michael spoke of this in a sworn deposition, his mother was present.
Michael bought back the 5% given to Branca around the same time in 2006.
Michael fired Branca for reasons Michael is not present to explain in detail.
Michael also spoke up about how he did not trust Branca, which is on record.
Another person is on record saying that they paid Branca, Michael's lawyers behind Michael's back to manipulate him to have a photo of him and his son on OK! magazine in 1997.
When all this is put together and other stuff, Londell can argue in negotiations or in court that a Jackson family member must be part of the executors, especially as Branca had a falling out with Michael at some point and also had a business interest in some of the assets in the Michael Jackson Family Trust, which may be a conflict of interest in his decision making in the future, especially as there will be people who will approach Branca to ask that he sells it.
Again during the trial, TMez mentioned of meetings since 2000 to try and get Michael and Sony together so that some people could buy off Michael's share, but Michael resisted all this.
How then will Branca perform on this crucial issue when he had a business interest in the same?
To me, Janet would have been the person I would think he would leave his children to. She is the youngest and she seems responsible. But maybe Michael didn't want it to be a mess between the rest of the family. You know being jealous or what not.To be fair Michael was clever in giving guardianship to his mother and Ms Ross as Janet he would have thought would want to start her own family, she is younger to him and had other committments.
I've loved Michael and have respected his private decision and all as a human being, a friend. I've been a wise member here since 2004 and never let emotion causing me to be overacted. I must say the following: If Michael's two lawyers are indeed declared Gods and Executors of his will and get full control of his estate to do whatever they want with the estate, money, etc... then Michael should be remembered only for making that decision.
he owns disneyland?