Do you realize that none of your posts is about Michael's professionalism or perfectionism when talking about his songs? It all comes down to your personal liking of the Cascio songs without slightest questioning of his either vocals, lyrics or melody compared to all of his other songs.
With such arguments you can also say that Aqua has better songs than Michael Jackson, only because YOU like them (hypothetically speaking).
Where is the slightest critical opinion of yours other than "because I like it" or "because I don't like it"?
You like MJ's melodyned, autotuned, messed up vocals finished by other producers and supported by the vocals of amateurs such as James Porte singing nonsense lyrics, fine for you, it's your right to love it. But don't come around saying as a fact it's Michael's best work on that album, because it clearly isn't, as there are many things that lacks Michael's prints. Your posts sound as someone's who has just discovered Michael and has no clue about how hard he would prepare himself, how hard he had worked and what kind of lyrics he would sing.
Here, I have a "chef d'oeuvre" up to the Cascio standards you might like. At least no doubter doubts the vocals.
[youtube]KF8DAIi4YoA&feature=related[/youtube]
and a remix of it:
[youtube]ES3XSXQ0LSg&feature=related[/youtube]
