Actually let me explain what I mean better. Any possible "proof" and counter arguments
Handwritten notes / lyrics
- We know Michael stayed there and as being a nice person he helped them with the lyrics but it doesn't mean he sang the songs.
- Well they forged the signature on the will so they can forge his handwriting as well.
Picture in a studio
- We know that Michael stayed there and hang around the studio. It can be from the time he recorded WBSS back vocals doesn't mean he sang those songs.
- That's e-casanova not Michael.
Work tapes (audio of talking about the songs
- We know Michael stayed there and as being a nice person he helped them with the songs, gave them ideas but it doesn't mean he sang the songs.
- That's Jason. He sang the songs and he faked the work tape audio.
People on the estate statement release comes up with their own statements saying the same thing
- They are wrong, they only worked with Michael but didn't listen to him as much as we did.
- They have monetary gain saying this.
Expert reports released
- They fooled the experts with adlibs etc.
- The test is flawed, they didn't test it against voice impersonators.
- Estate / Sony has all the money in the world, they bought the expert and the reports.
And even a video of Michael singing the songs
- They dubbed the Cascio song audio on that video, it's not real.
and it will go on and on and on. And seriously what proof? and how would it make any difference? Especially now.