Michael - The Great Album Debate

It's not that they don't 'sound like' Michael. It's that they aren't Michael lol. It's like you wearing a blue t-shirt and telling me it was pink :D
 
Here's to Dam2040..:)


happy-birthday-cake-animation-i17.gif
 
Whether they registered them 6 months or 6 years later, people question the songs because they don't sound like Michael. That's really the bottom line.

The point is I don't think there was much pain or grief. So yes I can imagine them coming up with such a plan. If Eddie really cared about Michael he wouldn't have done what he did. Point blank.

Judging others without proof, assuming people are guilty before there's even been a trial... One would think that -- of all people -- Michael Jackson fans wouldn't be like that...

How about helping me file a lawsuit if you're so sure Eddie's evil?
 
Judging others without proof, assuming people are guilty before there's even been a trial... One would think that -- of all people -- Michael Jackson fans wouldn't be like that...

How about helping me file a lawsuit if you're so sure Eddie's evil?

Some people have more proof than they'll ever need. Eddie is guilty. You wont understand that of course and I don't expect you to. Many do however. And no I won't help you with a lawsuit. I have neither the time, the money, nor the right geographic location. If I could help with a lawsuit however, I'd much prefer it not be spearheaded by someone who believes the vocals are Michael's. That's just me being honest.
 
A lawsuit? Really?

I hate these tracks as much as the next person but what will happen? Fans will put in money and time to put together a whole sophisticated reason as to why we're suing Sony Music and for all we know it could get thrown out.

How many times have you heard of a fan community suing a enormous music corporation and winning?
 
If you read, the purpose is to maybe try to gain more evidence, more information on what the hell these tracks are and how they came to.
 
Such a lawsuit would not be limited to be against a multicorporate enterprise or a multi-billion dollar estate, the primary respondent is Eddie Cascio, a civilian.

And back to the facts: there is no proof of any fraud.
 
Judging others without proof, assuming people are guilty before there's even been a trial... One would think that -- of all people -- Michael Jackson fans wouldn't be like that...

u would think that would be the case for MJ fans but the reality is that MJ fans have different standards for Michael and the people they think did not do good by Michael. So fans have no problem with judging anyone without hard proof as long as they they think or they believe their guilt.
 
I can't believe they put those songs in that Itunes compilation.

I can.

If they didn't, it would be an implied admission of guilt, which would lead us to say, "They didn't put them on! So they KNOW they're fake!" And we would get angrier and demand an apology even more than we do now.

Don't get me wrong, I want them removed from MJ's discography just as much as anyone else. But if the compilation included every song the estate released since Michael's death, it would only make sense to include the Cascios until some sort of admission or revelation is made.
 
Thread cleaned. There will be no comparisons made about our members opinions and those who supported MJ was a pedo or infering anyone here works for Sony the Estate, Jacksons etc.. That has been adressed before. further statements or accusations like that will land your account in moderation and or banned. Some of you are already walking on thin ice. Please Discuss the topic with out attcking or insulting each other or you wont be discussing it at all here.
Thank you for your cooperation and as always if you have any questions or concerns PM do not reply or discuss moderation requests on the board.
 
Let's hope its not that conspiracy phone call 5h1t.
That thought didn't strike me...

But it's kind of odd. That Robert Connors guy who talks in the fake video, says he will release all video and audio tapes he has of Michael talking about this conspiracy shit on September 23rd. Tomorrow is 23rd.

However, we know that is not MJ on the phone, it's just some BS. So I'd rather hope this "A Truth Untold" is something else and not some MJ Alive conspiracy BS.

Edit: They have a twitter account as well. Staying tuned for more info:

https://twitter.com/ATruthUntold
 
Last edited:
That thought didn't strike me...

But it's kind of odd. That Robert Connors guy who talks in the fake video, says he will release all video and audio tapes he has of Michael talking about this conspiracy shit on September 23rd. Tomorrow is 23rd.

However, we know that is not MJ on the phone, it's just some BS. So I'd rather hope this "A Truth Untold" is something else and not some MJ Alive conspiracy BS.

It looks WAY too professional for anything that could be related to this idiotic conspiracy theory circulating recently... I'm only guessing, but it could very well be about the new album... it could also be something completely else. Let's hope we know more soon!
 
Maybe someone could find out the source of the URL? Like when it was created etc
 
Maybe someone could find out the source of the URL? Like when it was created etc

Creation Date: 2013-08-11 01:36:55

Why should it be Cascio-related? Because some fan is using the word "truth"? How many "truths" have been made up by fans since 2009?
 
Album
Alive
Cascio

Thinking of what it could be. Either that,murder "proof" or maybe even a book?
 
They just updated, adding a YouTube video. Same teaser stuff. I'm starting to lose hope in it - when site like this tease for a long time with nothing shown, it usually amounts to nothing. However, I HOPE I'm wrong. And if they prove me wrong... I'd be a happy man.
 
Disgusting how he has a picture still of MJ from 30th Ann. 2001 in his studio.
 
Back
Top