These allegations bring up unwanted stories from the past, it's not just Robson and Safechuck, it makes you question relationships that he's had with Brett Barnes and Omer Bhatti.
Even the likes of Terry George or those Mexican boys.
Really? I find both above bolded to be pretty much irrelevant as there is no merit to the accusations other than MJ-haters gossiping about them on a weekly basis discussing in detail what alleged sex acts that might have taken place with the mexican boys if they exist and if MJ ever had any contact with them etc.
FBI Files Support Jackson's Innocence; Media Reports Otherwise
"
MYTH: The FBI file reveals that Jackson was investigated in 1985 for molesting two Mexican boys.
FACT: An FBI officer recorded an allegation that the bureau had previously investigated Jackson in 1985 for the molestation of two Mexican boys. This allegation was made by an unnamed writer who said the story had been told to him during research for a book. The FBI searched its records and could find no evidence that any such allegation had ever been reported to them.
... but the majority of media outlets failed to mention this important fact. A simple oversight, I'm sure..."
---
MYTH: "The FBI found that Jackson had engaged in phone sex with a British boy.
FACT: This story comes courtesy of The Sun.
The FBI file briefly references a newspaper story in which a man called Terry George claimed that Jackson, aged 19, had engaged in phonesex with him when he was just 13.
The Sun was rather proud that this story was referenced in the FBI file because it was the Sun which published it in the first place. As such, the newspaper was quick to toot its own horn with an 'FBI investigates Jackson over Sun's investigation' type fanfare.
In fact, the FBI did not investigate the claim and to date no evidence has been produced to support Terry George's story.
In its story about the FBI file, the Sun repeatedly referred to the phonecall between Jackson and Terry George as a matter of fact, even though no evidence has ever been produced to prove that the conversation ever took place.
George is a man of dubious character to say the least, currently owning a string of smutty phonesex companies. His story doesn't seem to add up, either. Despite Jackson's supposed inappropriate behaviour, George's website carries a photograph of himself with the star more than five years after the phonecall allegedly happened. The two still look like firm friends.
In subsequent interviews George has described how he lost touch with Jackson and resorted to behaviour which could be described as stalking - calling Jackson all the time, hanging around outside his hotels, trying to bluff his way past Jackson's security. More than anything, George's interview with the Sun seemed like an act of jealous revenge by an embittered former acquaintance. Either way, the FBI found no merit to George's claim."
I should begin by saying that the release of Michael Jackson's FBI file was not motivated by any desire to damage his legacy or smear his na...
charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com
---
Are you also questioning the non-existing supposed sex tape with MJ and a boy that Diane Diamond put her reputation as a journalist on?
(Gutierrez was the source of course) Are you also questioning the 1000s of hoax tips that the prosecutions hotline generated in 2005, when the DAs office begged people to contact them with any info whatsoever who could help put MJ behind bars and bolster their weak case. Phone calls poured in but not even the biased Tom Sneddon found anything he could use, pretty telling.
Are you really concerned about random claims made by anonymous sources citing events and unknown people we have no idea if they even exist?
www.youtube.com
