Michael Jackson feat. 50 cent - MONSTER - its the real deal says 50 -READ!

I'd like to hear MJ's voice in this thing, unfortunately all I hear is a (very bad) impersonator, I'm fan since 1983 I have the experience and it is clear that this is not MJ In this song, but I must admit that it's a great chartbuster not like breaking news, all I need, or keep your head up that are very bad!! Monster is very very good (despite it's not MJ)
 
This'll be my last post on the matter of their authenticity as I don't wanna start a big war/discussion/argument.

By that logic, this entire album isn't worth it, because MJ isn't involved in the production of it. We as fans can't expect the next "Dangerous", "Bad" or "Thriller" in these albums, it's impossible to reach their levels of greatness. MJ's voice is not finite, so we have to take what we have, even if said voice isn't up to scratch. In fact, I'd go as far to say that the Cascios have gold with their MJ recordings, as I'd imagine they're some of, if not his very last studio work, so I'm excited to hear them, what he was working on.

This whole album is not his "vision" because he has nothing to do with it. It's a different kind of Michael Jackson album, and I fully expect to love all 10 tracks, but they won't be comparable to his earlier work because he was COMPLETELY involved. Now, all that's left is his wondrous voice, and no amount of people proclaiming it to be fake will not affect me, because I know it's him and no-one can ruin it for me, it only ticks me off that FANS are trying to deliberately hurt other fans. When people comment about how fans are "stupid" and "not real fans" for believing the Cascios to be genuine, it's really hurtful, moreso than you'd think. At least have a clear and concise argument before proclaiming "FAKE!!!! IT'S JASON MALACHI!!!!! $ONY IS THE DEVIL!!!! THE CASCIOS ARE TOO!!!!!"

Jeez, it's like Sonic the Hedgehog fans sometimes.... It's nice to get that out of my system.


I don't want to hurt the fans. You tell me why the most of us hear that it's not Michael while the others are and the last couple of leaks on youtube. You do hear the difference right? no attacks please.
 
Wow sounds great, one of Michael's best "club" friendly tracks in a decade. Great stuff.
 
Re: Monster [Fully leaked without 50Cent] DISCUSSION

Could someone plz PM? :)
 
guys.. it is michael... :) I made an acapella and I pitched it down... and I got a clear MJ voice.. all the problem of this is, that Mj vooce ic badly edited and really pitched hup, and it sounds like it is singing some 20yrs old guy.. and not mj.. but just pitched it down.. and it is ok :) ghod I love this song...

ps: WHERE ARE THE SAMPLES FROM THREATENED, ON THE LINE AND UNBREAKABLE?
 
guys.. it is michael... :) I made an acapella and I pitched it down... and I got a clear MJ voice.. all the problem of this is, that Mj vooce ic badly edited and really pitched hup, and it sounds like it is singing some 20yrs old guy.. and not mj.. but just pitched it down.. and it is ok :) ghod I love this song...

ps: WHERE ARE THE SAMPLES FROM THREATENED, ON THE LINE AND UNBREAKABLE?

Can you upload that youtube? I would love to hear. :)
edit: Sorry for the double post
 
The demos on The ultimate collection are way better then this overproduced pop crap
michael never worked on this
 
The song is ok at best. Don't start me on the vocals. People need to stop twisting what everyone is saying by implying they are attacking Michael himself. People are going to have differen't opinions on this subject, We need to accept that. People who don't like the songs are perfectly entitled not to and there is nothing wrong with that, and those that do and think it's michael, if it makes them happy then thats great, again, there is nothing wrong with that. Constructive critisism is not a bad thing, positivity can't exist without it's negative counterpart. Personal attacks or foul or abusive behaviour is obviously not acceptable though. My last point, is that we are all fans of Michael and a community, the 'who's the biggest fan' competition needs to stop now.
 
I heard the little snippet a few weeks ago of 'Monster', and I haven't listened to the full version this time, as it didn't sound like him the first time, for me......I wish this would all go away...I mean, even if his voice is in there somewhere...just don't :censored: use these songs that were clearly in such an unfinished state...had they used their brains and NOT use these songs, none of this doubt would be happening for a lot of us...
 
I don't want to hurt the fans. You tell me why the most of us hear that it's not Michael while the others are and the last couple of leaks on youtube. You do hear the difference right? no attacks please.

In response to this, it looks to me that it's not "most" of the fans that hear that it's not him, but roughly half, according to various polls I've seen around the internet. I hear some differences in his singing, but I've heard those differences in other demos, he's not giving it his all. Watch the film "Ghosts" and listen to the Mayor, that should give you an idea of his vocal range. Are you seriously saying that there is NO chance whatsoever that it's him? NO chance? I initially had doubts after reading this stuff on "Breaking News", but after listening to the a capella, those suspicions went away. I'll agree that the background vocals are not just him, at least. But I feel that the lead vocals are him. The ad-libs from other songs are for padding, not to make it "more believable". I personally think it's partly psychological. The idea of a fake MJ song was introduced to us, and the idea that the Cascio songs were fake was brought into that. As a result, our natural instinct is to listen to it intently to try and listen to any inaccuracies, and any abnormalities with his voice, despite that it's a built-up demo, makes us instantly think it's not him. I'm over the suspicions and I definitely think it's him. There's most likely more background vocalists introduced, but I sternly believe that it's him on main vocals, because I have no reason to believe otherwise. The Estate and SONY have mentioned who had confirmed that it's him, and they're all extremely trustworthy. SONY has a lot to lose if it was fake, it's not logical. If there was CONCRETE, concise written evidence that has been verified by someone like an audiologist, then I'll admit I was duped, but these officials, along with people who worked with MJ believes it's him, and it sounds exactly like him to me, therefore I have no real reason to believe for a second that it's not him

That whole thing about hurting other fans wasn't aimed at you, but I've seen quite a few comments from various people on here saying stuff to that effect.
 
Really great tune - better than when I first heard it through snippets.
 
Could I get the PM to the a capella as well, please?
 
this is pure shit, thank u very much, well done Sony
 
I've just tried toning it out down, but it's still nothing like MJ. Nothing is going stop him sounding like a goat.
 
Lol it's funny why people are blaming Sony for this! It's Michael's song, what has Sony done wrong by releasing a Song Michael created, it's no different from "Much Too Soon" or any other song released on the album for that matter.
 
Back
Top