Tygger
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2012
- Messages
- 2,316
- Points
- 0
Galactus123;4070607 said:Actually Michael got married again during HIStory Tour and his first child was born. So I don't think he was sad during the tour.
That is what I meant here:
Tygger;4070542 said:- had to accept a failed marriage,
- was starting his own family in a manner that may not have been his ideal,
serendipity;4070663 said:Um, did I say he wasn't? I'm obviously talking about the general public - isn't that why most of you are afraid of? That the general public wouldn't like it if he lips? I happen to think most of the general public would want to see him dance and put on a show and would not care much if he's singing live or lipping.
A lot of the times his singing has taken a back seat to the choreography and the show and the general public never seemed to mind it. So I'm not sure why all the complaining.
MattyJam;4070692 said:I don't see the need to gloss over the HIStory tour as if it's some kind of dirty secret in MJ's career. The show was a wonderful spectacle and deserves to be seen. Do I wish he'd done more live vocals? Of course. And I understand and to some extent agree with a lot of fans frustrations about MJ's lack of live vocals on this tour. But we can't change history (pardon the pun). MJ himself came very close to releasing the HIStory tour on VHS, so he obviously didn't feel the need to hide it.
Will he get some shit for lip-syncing? Perhaps, although I do think it's being exaggerated somewhat. But like it or not, the HIStory tour is now a part of his legacy so there's no point in glossing over it.
Very true. This is why I said the previous statement below:
Tygger;4070542 said:As the years went on, Michael continued to be known as an extraordinary performer. However, his performances were becoming more known for the spectacle than the artistry which is the unfortunate effect of being an other-worldly talent relegated to pop star status. The King of Pop label had its privileges and its curses.
It could be some fans were not aware of it but, that is how it happened, Michael was obviously aware of it, and made the artistic choice to support what the public expected, a.k.a, spectacle from the greatest entertainer. Fans can look at any performance from that time to see it is true.
I am unsure why M25 BJ performance is being discussed here but, that performance actually proves audiences were more interested in Michael as a performer who gave dance performances no one had ever seen before. Same with 95 VMAs. That does not mean no one was interested in Michael as a singer; it means audiences were more interested in Michael’s performance as a dancer and the spectacle only he possibly deliver which made him the greatest entertainer. And yes, the History tour was successful and yes, it was already broadcasted on television in Europe several times.
MattyJam;4070702 said:Many concerts by legendary acts are now getting low-key cinema releases and it's always a small handful of showings in selected cinemas and then straight to DVD. I don't think it'd be any different with the HWT. Perhaps if they made it more into a documentary and included behind the scenes footage etc then that might broaden its appeal amongst the fanbase.
Agreed.
Zakk;4070701 said:It depends on advertising, they're not going to release something to theaters and guarantee a big loss in profits. They should promote the hell out of it!
Bad25’s was released in NY/LA U.S theaters for Oscar nomination purposes only. It was mostly promoted to online fans. My U.S. friend saw an ad in a local paper and I believe she did read a review of it at the time. No other promotion was done and from what I understand from NY/LA, U.S. fans, the attendance was rather low due to the promotion and that an abbreviated version was to air nationally on U.S. television. Estate/Sony cannot be trusted in regards to promotion; only others working in conjunction with Estate/Sony have been successful in that task.