Janet is in Chicago. I looked into getting tickets but every show was sold out! I read the review of the show in the Chicago Suntimes yesterday and he recommended it.
He said her tribute to Michael was "fierce"
It looks like such a sweet moment, she blew a kiss up to the sky too.They were talking about it on the radio and listeners said she sang Together Again against a backdrop of photos of them as children, and the listeners said they cried, but the song's up beat kept them all up on the floor dancing. They gave the show high praise.
Will there be these cheaper tickets for Paris shows too?RhythmNation;3286512 said:For those saying its too expensive, the cheaper seats are already on sale in the UK. Starting from £45.
https://secure.ticketline.co.uk/tickets/13255731/janet-jackson/london-royal-albert-hall/2011-07-02
I'm not sure about ParisWill there be these cheaper tickets for Paris shows too?
I'm attending the July 3rd concert in London :wild::wild::wild: :clapping::clapping::clapping: unk:unk:
:clapping: Thats great I'm going to the second, I'll be trying to get tickets to that show too if I can afford it :lol:, so might see you there (BTW your siggy is great, I've never seen that pic before )
Oh and Janet's next 2 shows are in Toronto, Canada guys, she dedicated 'Come Back To Me' to them :yes:
It looks like such a sweet moment, she blew a kiss up to the sky too.
[youtube]xKZ7CmxVP3I[/youtube]
she's been blowing the kiss up to the sky since the Velvet Rope tour when the song was dedicated to her friends that died from AIDs.. Just because she throws a few photos of her deceased brother on the screen doesn't mean the kiss in the sky is for him.
Can the kiss be for both of her deceased friend and her deceased brother?
Why such bitterness? When Diana Ross "threw a few photos" of Michael on the screen during her show, people call it a heartfelt tribute. When Janet does the same, some choose to play down the significance?
I would've hoped that his sister could've done a better tribute than throw a few pics on the screen and sing a song that she had dedicated to her friends 14 years ago. But I guess a little tribute is better than none at all
I would've hoped that his sister could've done a better tribute than throw a few pics on the screen and sing a song that she had dedicated to her friends 14 years ago. But I guess a little tribute is better than none at all
Where you sat?I'm attending the July 3rd concert in London :wild::wild::wild: :clapping::clapping::clapping: unk:unk:
Where you sat?
I would've hoped that his sister could've done a better tribute than throw a few pics on the screen and sing a song that she had dedicated to her friends 14 years ago. But I guess a little tribute is better than none at all
awwww I can feel I'm getting jealous here!!! Lucky you!!!5th row
awwww I can feel I'm getting jealous here!!! Lucky you!!!
Honestly about her tribute to Michael... it's perfectly fine with me... I think it's nice! Her song together again gave me lots of comfort too when my boyfriend passed away.
I think we're all grieving pretty different.
I do not in public... I just feel it no business to others... it's between me and the dead person.
Still can live with everybody dealing different with grief.
But, this is a Janet Jackson concert. She's a very successful artist in her own right. Throughout her career, she's tried hard not to live in the shadow of her larger-than-life brother.
It's not an easy situation for her. I'm sure she wants to honor her brother. But, if she does a elaborate tribute in her shows, people will find it tacky. Some would even think she uses Michael to advertize herself.
Together Again is a wonderful song. I find a new meaning to the song. May be Janet feels the same. Who knows? May be she feels Together Again is the most appropriate song to express her feeling to her brother. There is nothing wrong to "re-dedicate" the song to Michael, IMO.
I would've hoped that his sister could've done a better tribute than throw a few pics on the screen and sing a song that she had dedicated to her friends 14 years ago. But I guess a little tribute is better than none at all
Honestly meme and others... for a fan of any star it always comes over pretty non classy to talk others down like you try it here with Janet.
Michael was in his own class sure.
But I'm always wondering why fans (not only of Michael) can't just enjoy what they have and let others enjoy what they chose to. AND I SURELY DON'T WANT THIS TO BE AN ANALYZE OF FAN BEHAVIOR HERE AGAIN! I just think there is no need to talk others down or even all the time compare them to Michael when you're really happy with your fandom.
Gosh leave Janet alone! She's at least working and having a career on her own!
It's funny how some peope seem to forget that Janet was a star in her own right since the 80's. Out of ALL Jacksons, she is the only one who even comes close to the superstar status Michael had. She worked hard, released singles, albums and videos, and toured the world, and earned everything she has. It's pathetic that some MJ fans are being so hard on her. It makes me feel ashamed. Really.
She worked hard and made tons of money yet her mother and father relied on MJ to take care of them, and now that he's dead they still rely on him to take care of them? Something is wrong with that picture..
Anyway good to see she's enjoying herself and touring again after her last tour outing.
She worked hard and made tons of money yet her mother and father relied on MJ to take care of them, and now that he's dead they still rely on him to take care of them? Something is wrong with that picture..
Anyway good to see she's enjoying herself and touring again after her last tour outing.
She worked hard and made tons of money yet her mother and father relied on MJ to take care of them, and now that he's dead they still rely on him to take care of them? Something is wrong with that picture..