Amy Jackson
Proud Member
Re: Jackson's brothers on Larry King monday
Oh thanks tuesday??
I'll see!!
Oh thanks tuesday??
I'll see!!
What happened did it get rescheduled?
How irritating! If these people don't want to go on Larry King they need to tell him no, same with Thome Thome. I won't hold my breath for Tuesday.
Larry said on Twitter that they'll be on tomorrow. Today they'll talk about the Amanda Knox case. But tomorrow, the brothers are on. :yes:
LKL will usually push his schedule around to accommodate breaking stories. This Amanda Knox thing is a pretty popular story for whatever reason and the verdict just came in and bla bla bla so this is probably why they pushed the brothers to tomorrow. I don't think this was their doing, this was a Larry King/CNN thing. Just like when Michael passed LKL was reporting on the story that very night, and I'm sure that night he had to push some already scheduled person to another night because of the breaking news...
The brothers will be on Larry King tomorrow instead as others have pointed out.
I'm sorry I posted out of my emotion. To me Michael's passing and his brother's dealing with it should be the forefront. So what, someone is a murderer or accused of being a murderer and all of a sudden they become famous??? Michael is a mega star. Who is Amanda Knox. Doesn't Larry King realize the Jacksons have other things to do too. Their lives don't revolve around breaking news, except for the breaking news that happened on June 25.
I'm not trying to argue with you by the way. Whatever frustration you or anyone senses in this post is because of Larry King, not you. I know where you're coming from and I certainly understand you.
LKL will usually push his schedule around to accommodate breaking stories. This Amanda Knox thing is a pretty popular story for whatever reason and the verdict just came in and bla bla bla so this is probably why they pushed the brothers to tomorrow. I don't think this was their doing, this was a Larry King/CNN thing. Just like when Michael passed LKL was reporting on the story that very night, and I'm sure that night he had to push some already scheduled person to another night because of the breaking news...
the one who created the intervention story and convinced the other siblings mj was drugged up is absent , the one with the agenda to prove mj was junkie is not part of this reality tv show . none of these brothers participating were accused by MJ in court documents of stealing and conspiring against him , certainly none of these brothers were part of trying to kick Branca and McClian out to replace them . the one whose name was absent from the letter released by the family to deny any intervention is not "selling his brother " , Randy is out so don't worry .
i didn't know this. there was a letter released by the family denying an intervention? then why did Janet Jackson say there was an intervention?
LOL....I know right! But, Janet name wasn't on that letter, though! I guess they didn't want people all up on MJ's business, at that time (if it was true) which I don't think it was!?
LOL....I know right! But, Janet name wasn't on that letter, though! I guess they didn't want people all up on MJ's business, at that time (if it was true) which I don't think it was!?
Janet said there was an intervention-more than one infact. You don't do that for a drug problem, but for a drug addiction.
Randy and Janet were closer to Mike than the other siblings, I believe them over Jermaine any day.
This reality showed was planned and being filmed long before Michael Jackson died. God forbid these brothers try to move forward with the projects they already had planned. After all this is the 40th Anniversary of the Jackson Five..... just saying. I'll be tuning in.
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't follow the Jackson's, but aren't they only getting the opportunity to move forward with this project because Michael passed and the media has a new found and I believe temporary interest in them?
I do agree that they need to recognize the 40th anniversary, but it won't be the same without Michael :no:
i don't think degree of closeness is reliable on something like this. as far as i am concerned, second hand info is second hand to me. so Jermaine and Janet are the same, to me. it's not enough proof for me to believe MJ was an addict. we really don't know what the meaning of 'close' really is in a supercharged accusation such as this.
and no matter how close one human being is to another, i'm quite certain that every human being makes sure he or she has quiet time to him or herself, where another human being cannot interfere. and in that quiet time, every human being has their secrets that no one else knows.
yeah.to be fair this was happening b4 juneI don't know, maybe the "moving forward" part is true, BUT they did start working on this show before Michael passed, in January of this year if I remember right.