Under-rated? Yes
A fan favourite? Yes
Poorly promoted? Yes
But, a great album? It's mostly not for me, except a few tracks (Unbreakable, Heartbreaker, 2000 Watts, Threatened and Whatever Happens). It's far too long and has so many ballads - most pretty weak, IMHO. As a review when it was released stated, it is over twice as long as Thriller and has less than half the effect.
I do listen to some tracks time-to-time, but it's not a classic.
I know I'll get attacked by people saying it is an amazing album full of heartfelt ballads etc., but there we go...
no attacks...
there is an irony though...how come 50 % of the threads in this section are about Invincible? lol
i don't want to be a lightining rod either...
but maybe media had a little influence on the highly critical nature of the criticism of this album, because there is a lot of interest in this album...so..maybe its not so underrated after all..
but people might get mad at me for saying this, but i think media has a little influence on thinking...
i think if the albums were reversed, thriller would be thought of as underselling, and overcritcized, when in reality it would probably still sell as it was reported..
in conclusion, i think the media is lying about Invincible sales..the bias against Michael was extreme..and, if i had said the media was that biased against Michael, and nobody saw the evidence..people wouldn't believe me..
because there's something subliminal about the media...
not that this is a subject comparison, but, it's a media comparison..
it's sorta like alchohol..
it's popular...there are crashes due to drinking and driving, but because of the cool beer commercials(and government allowing it)...alchohol is still popular..
anyway, it's strange for me to say i don't like an album that i listen to constantly, and bought with my own money, and download, constantly, since 2001..so...i guess i love Invincible..lol