if you don't understand that Jack Gordon made her do all those things, and controlled her
I'd love nothing more than to believe that Jack Gordon forced La Toya to make those accusations against Michael. But as I was going through her book "Starting Over" last night, there are some parts where it is so obvious that she is lying about how things happened. Take the part about the press conference for example. She says that she had never read the script that Jack gave her beforehand. Yet you can see in the video that at some point she's not even reading from her sheet of paper anymore. So how does her version of events make sense? And why lie about it if she has nothing to hide? It would have been more credible if she had just said that Jack Gordon made her rehearse beforehand. Saying that she had never read the script before is just ridiculous to anyone who has seen the video of the press conference. Also she says that Jack didn't beat her into it. And that he didn't threaten to kill Michael if she didn't do it. By her own admission, she says she just
assumed that he would hurt Michael if she didn't do it, just because he hated Michael so much.
Read this:
Now compare that to the video:
And in this part, she says that before escaping Jack Gordon, she had to ask him to give her her passport. The thing is... she also says she was in New York at the time, so why did she need her passport to escape? Not only that, but she says he gave her her passport when she asked him. Why would he just give her her passport if he was trying to hold her prisoner? And why would she ask for her passport if she was trying to escape without his knowledge. That's like clearly letting him know that you're leaving, which would be pretty dumb if she was really his prisoner. So I guess she wasn't, and she knew she wasn't.
And finally, she mentions so many occasions where Jack let her be alone with some of her family members. She says he let her stay in Michael's hotel room alone with him (with all of Michael's security guards nearby no less.) He also let her ride alone in Jermaine's car, all she had to do was tell him to turn the car around. Why would Jack Gordon let her be alone with them, in situations where it was so easy to escape, if he was truly trying to keep her prisoner? Doesn't make any sense.
I truly believe he abused her by beating her on many occasions, there ain't no doubt in my mind about that. But the whole "he held me prisoner and every single thing I did was against my will"... doesn't make sense...
What's more, now that Jack Gordon is dead, she keeps doing exactly what she was doing with him, except now Michael is no longer the one she's accusing without any proof. In the book, she keeps saying that Frank Dileo, John Branca and other people were doing to Michael what Jack Gordon was doing to her. Seriously now? I don't remember Michael ever complaining that these people were holding him prisoner and beating him into doing things. And when he thought they were getting too controlling, he just fired them. Her new accusations are no different than the ones she did against Michael back in the day.