michaeljackson&lisamarie
Proud Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2012
- Messages
- 740
- Points
- 0
Thanks for that info Barbee0715. Oh brother this jealous idiot can just go sit down somewhere.
I made it through the first seven minutes of this more than an hour long review. One impersonator cutting down another.
Nah...I just cannot justify that. This scenario typifies that Michael was under the influence of drugs/narcotics. Which the autopsy report clearly shows Michael's organs were strong, not scar tissue, which a regular drug user would have. The autopsy don't lie!
Another thing the movie got wrong is that the bodyguard said Michael never saw Elizabeth again. I don't know if it's also mentioned in the book or it just was purposely changed in the movie but Michael was living in LA again in 2008 and went to visit her in October.
Did the bodyguards portrayed themselves as friends and saviors in the book? Karen Fake, Bush and Tompkins were working for him for dacades and MJ didn't see them as friends.
Another thing the movie got wrong is that the bodyguard said Michael never saw Elizabeth again. I don't know if it's also mentioned in the book or it just was purposely changed in the movie but Michael was living in LA again in 2008 and went to visit her in October.
Did the bodyguards portrayed themselves as friends and saviors in the book? Karen Fake, Bush and Tompkins were working for him for dacades and MJ didn't see them as friends.
^They just can't accept the Jacksons still are preying on Michael like a kettle of vultures waiting what they can get or steal from him. The more I knew what they were or still are capable of doing, the more I think they love more his money than they loved Michael. Even his mother is corrupt and greedy.
I made it through the first seven minutes of this more than an hour long review. One impersonator cutting down another.
Yes but remember this was probably way before june 2009 so maybe mike did take something that made him a little erratic and we cant deny michael didnt have dependecy on drugs from time to time. I mean he didnt go to rehab in 93 for nothing as much as we love mj we cant ignore it like it wasnt there cuz it was
Dr. Allan Metzger, a lupus specialist and rheumatologist, had been treating Michael Jackson since 1983. He was aware of what Michael took and what doctor's, usually at different hotel's, when out of town of Los Angeles. Debbie Rowe would let Dr. Metzger know if she had concerns.
I know that Michael can't sleep when he is creating , or after he was creating, he always wanted to make it better, Dr. Metzger recalled
http://www.teammichaeljackson.com/archives/9807
This always bothers me when I see Michael being depicted within this context. Then the one telling the story proceeds to give the appearance of Michael being a small child depending upon said storyteller.
An Evening of Love, Light and Laughter to Benefit Lupus LA and Lupus Research (10/2003)
Dr. Allan Metzger and Michael gave a speech together at this public function.
The thing is i think he felt like he was still that young boy in the jackson 5 days who was hurting and was still hurting in his adults days. Im not saying he was a dumb immature idiot but the were things from his past i dont think he ever really dealt with and didnt know how to deal with it as he didnt like confrontation. Then 1993, 2003-2005 happened and that completey changed him in way that he was never gonna be the same again
That is basically what was being said in the Man in the Mirror documentary that aired on March this year. They talked about how Michael never really learned how to handle adulthood and even though he gave it a good shot considering his life and the people around him, I believe he felt safest and most himself around kids.
The problem with people around Michael including these bodyguards is that no matter who you talk to they will always spin the story so that they come out as the good guys. Funny how Michael had so many 'good guys around him yet he was incredibly lonely and couldn't trust anyone.I think he felt safest around kids but mostly PPB and if what bill & javon say is the truth i think HE FELT SAFEST I MEAN REAL SAFE AROUND THEM. Problem is with baine and all those idiots around him they knew how to misled him and the saddest part is SO DID HIS FAMILY!
No actors look or act exactly like the REAL thing-back in the old days Bette Davis didn't look like Elizabeth I, Henry Fonda didn't look like Abe Lincoln, now Jessica Lange doesn't look like Joan Crawford, or Al Pacino look like Phil Spector. Or does Judy Davis actually look and act like Judy Garland or Madonna look and act like Eva Peron? No! But they got it right.I was one to say before this movie was even made, the only person I can see pull this off is E'cas. and Yes he would have done a great job.. That said I can't take away from navi the good work he did. I can say he stepped up to the plate, put in the effort and did a good job. We can sit here like critics and say this or that is not the same as Michael.. Well, he's not Michael...
There are biopics release constantly and we can say fairly 'so and so did a great job' when in actuality they did not look very close to the real life person because we can appreciate the work put into it. But because we are an MJ fan base we dissect Navi's every move, every gesture and look for the holes. That's unfair.
Does Chadwick Boseman really look like James Brown? no, not really .. Joaqin phoenix look like johnny cash, nope.. And if we were super fans of either of them we would spot out beyond so many 'wrongs'. But we let things go cuz we don't hold onto the portrayals under a microscope the same way.
Navi yas spent more years studying Michael than most actors that we've praised for portrayals in movies, I can say without a doubt navi put his full effort, and did his homework.
If I remember correctly, from reading here and on a Facebook fan page I'm on, Navi attacked Earnest Valentino because of the scenes in the movie, NOT his portrayal. Way too much sinister overtones and stuff. Did NOT see anything even remotely like this in this movie.This is exactly what Navi did to Earnest Valentino after his movie was released in March, then went on to make this disastrous movie. :doh: His comments were nasty, below the belt and arrogant. I'm sure these impersonators find this to be a good way to promote themselves but I find it rather pathetic. If you're so great let your actions speak louder than your words.
No actors look or act exactly like the REAL thing-back in the old days Bette Davis didn't look like Elizabeth I, Henry Fonda didn't look like Abe Lincoln, now Jessica Lange doesn't look like Joan Crawford, or Al Pacino look like Phil Spector. Or does Judy Davis actually look and act like Judy Garland or Madonna look and act like Eva Peron? No! But they got it right.
You just have to get the resemblance close enough, and mannerisms, voice enough, so the viewer can visualize the actual person, and then sit back and view life through that person's shoes. I think his gripe is all the people that say he is the spitting image of Michael Jackson, or he IS Michael Jackson. Well, no, he's not.
Wendy, for example, is a fool if she really thinks that, and I don't value her opinion anyway.
Yeah, you're never going to have someone who looks EXACTLY like Michael Jackson. For a decent amount of the film, I thought Navi actually nailed the look. There were times when he didn't as much, but I feel it was more his inconsistent acting and voice that distracted me.
Tina Turner also did not shoot him for nothing. Randy does have violent tendencies.