respect77;4184928 said:
^ His allegations are a mixture of VG and Arvizo. I think especially the porn thing is very telling about how both Robson and Safechcuk were creating their allegations from the ones before them.
Yes and they know they have to explain all that hetero porn away somehow since the most obvious explanation
would be that MJ liked adult women and that would not fit their narrative.
Problem is that MJ kept buying those magazines while he was supposedly grooming and molesting Chandler in 1992 93
and he kept buying them even after the Arvizos left the ranch. By that time he had more than 70 such magazines
why did he need the Aug 2003 edition of Barely Legal? To groom the next boy the 1991-2003 July editions wouldn't have sufficed?
Sneddon also questioned Violet Silva about adult magazines which were sent back to MJ from Japan.
27 Q. All right. During the time that you were employed at the ranch, were you ever aware of who 9596
1 was sent out to buy adult magazines for Mr. Jackson?
2 A. No.
3 Q. Did you receive in your office a package of adult magazines that came from Japan?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And those were -- the contents of the envelope were from Mr. Jackson’s luggage that was
8 mailed back to Neverland after he had gone to Japan, correct?
10 A. I don’t know if it was from Japan, but they were left in my office.
12 Q. And they were adult materials, correct?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. And you described them, I think, as very graphic?
16 A. Yes.
How does this support the theory that he needed such magazines to groom boys? Was any boy
with him on that trip? No, if there had been Sneddon would have made an issue out of it.
Some of those magazines and DVDs were found in a suitcase which MJ clearly used while traveling
and at least one of the DVDs was released after Feb 2003. No boy traveled with MJ
after Feb 2003 so why did he have adult magazines and DVDs with him? Well, we know why and so did
Sneddon , he just didn't like the answer.
Also, if Sneddon had really believed his own theory about those magazines he would have taken
the fingerprints of Robson, Culkin Barnes too not just Arvizo's. But he didn't even try to
check for those fingerprints. He knew the result would not support his side of the story.
I always wondered whether that was the reason why they didn't check for DNA evidence
on the mattresses in June's and Evan's homes. They knew it would come back negative.
SarahJ;4184930 said:
Not terribly original are they? V.G. has been involved in almost everything else one way or the other so why not this. **eye roll**.
Dimond and Stacy Brown had some connection to Safechuck (Brown was the one who reported after Robson that two more are ready to come forward and Dimond reported the Safechuck lawsuit before anyone else) Both know Gutierrez very well. I have no doubt that either haters of Brown/Dimond contacted Safechuck after Robson's U-turn and tried to convince him to jump
on the bandwagon. He needed a story so he supplied what he remembered (like MJ handing out money to homeless people or
giving him a globe and the Thriller jacket etc.) Gutierrez then wrote yet another pedo fiction mixing facts with his sick fantasies.
They spent almost a year putting together this story and still couldn't get it "right" like checking whether
there was any testimony by the Quindoys or not. Lame.