[Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror / New assult Pg 38

Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Like many people pointed out earlier if the FBI has all this so called evidence that Michael payed off all these kids then why didn't the FBI arrest him and why didn't Tom Sneddon use this as evidence?

I'm still waiting for the usual B.S answer of ''Well the FBI let Michael get away with it because he's a celebrity''
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Not a shock. I am going to quote Roger ( Oh my lord has it come to that) they never bothred to check or did not care to check and when people point out how wrong they are they delete it.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Not a shock. I am going to quote Roger ( Oh my lord has it come to that) they never bothred to check or did not care to check and when people point out how wrong they are they delete it.

You won't even be able to do that anymore. They completely removed their comment section. So no one can even go back in and post anything. They have it completely censored now.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Agree with all the posters, just a pathetic patronising statment from the online team and executors. What do you mean thanks for brining our attention to these fbi articles - that should be THEIR job, monitoring what's going on re mj in the media. They are just incompetent or they don't care. The fact it's a weekend and it's now bedtime for them in la is just irrelevant - they live in a 24 hr media where articles go round the globe in a click of a mouse. Do we have to wait for them to get to the office on a monday morning? They respond quick enough when anyone says mj's will is fake or some noname reporter says thriller didn't sell 100m records. But mj = pedo paying off dozens of boys acc to fbi files - just a 'don't believe everything you read in newspapers' and a 'hey book your tix for cirque show'. It's not fans that need to be told, it's the media with a factual, authorative rebuttal.

Weitzman, the lawyer to the estate, is actually named in the docs published as drawing up a gagging contract to silence some redacted child actor/dancer. MJ fans know coz of roger's articles how that contract is bogus but i guarantee there's not another living soul out there who knows that. It began life in 93 in the globe tabloid as a contract drawn up by bert fields lawfirm but seems to have switched here to weitzman - maybe because bert fields sued the globe for $millions as it was slander. The fact that weitzman hasn't retaliated is astounding. People will see the lack of response and they will take it as a sign of weaknes and will act. Just as the family don't react when pppb's paternity is challenged and so it's open season on them, so will it be open season on mj as pedo allegations.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Sorry, but I disagree this is a good thing. Even if Michael was non-confrontative himself. That was his nature - and in many respects his downfall too. I love him with all my heart but it doesn't mean everything he did was effective. And it definitely does not mean the Estate needs to follow him in this. They need to be tougher. This is not something that is difficult to challene, so they should with a bit more than just say "move on and enjoy MJ ONE".

I agree. It is so disappointing to see a response to slander being turned into a marketing opportunity.
 
FANS of MJ. EMIAL TOM JOYNER about MJ.

Tom Joyner just morning was talking about the UK Sun tabloid story of MJ. ANy information you have on MJ to show TOm JOyner, write him on www.blackamericaweb.com or text tom at 646464
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

They need to be smart. Things like this will continue to damage Michael's image, therefore lowering the earning potential of future products, resulting in less money for them. Regardless, they were supposed to be Michael's "friends". They need to be tough and pro-active.
 
Re: FANS of MJ. EMIAL TOM JOYNER about MJ.

I do not have my phone on me right now but if someone can text Tom Joyner about how this story is Lie, It would be great. His text is 646464. He will read it on air.
 
Re: FANS of MJ. EMIAL TOM JOYNER about MJ.

om/send-us-feedback/?contact-form-id=74436&contact-form-sent=141949&_wpnonce=0ffbf1229e
 
Re: FANS of MJ. EMIAL TOM JOYNER about MJ.

The only place where I am seeing this story is on TOM joyner. I am so mad I can scream. Again fans, get on the ball and start emailing or texting Tom. You can even give feedback on www.blackamericaweb.com
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

If there was one thing about this story that bugs me more then anything is that it is clearly a big fat lie. And if someonee be it the estate be it the family whomever does not try to correct it then that is just not right. But I won't scream and hollar just yet wait and see
 
I’ve been alerted to a story in the British press about Michael Jackson paying off 24 families of children he supposedly molested. Readers of this column must know that I have almost a PhD in Michael Jackson. The story is not true. It’s based on files left behind by a National Enquirer reporter, now dead, called Jim Mitteager. In 2005 I went through tons of Mitteager’s files, re-reporting them. A lot of it was just poppycock. Read this whole column I published back then. I did a lot of work on it. As devil’s advocate, I tried to find someone who would say they were molested by Michael Jackson. No one would because, I think, no one had been.
From March 2005, c2013 Showbiz411.com
Was there a kid who made a deal with Michael Jackson before his first accuser settled with the pop star for $20 million in 1993?
Tape recordings left behind by a deceased National Enquirer reporter would suggest there was, but on closer inspection, it turns out there probably wasn’t.
In fact, the tapes show that there was a zealous push on the part of the supermarket tabloids 12 years ago to find any boy who might have been abused by Jackson.
This will be a disappointment for Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon, who has not been able to produce any other Jackson “victims” so far.
On Monday, Judge Rodney Melville will hold a hearing to determine whether or not Jackson’s “prior” acts can be brought into this trial.
If they are allowed, what could they be and where did they come from? And are they real?
Sneddon is prepared to subpoena every ex-Jackson employee and cop who was involved in the first case, even those who’ve since sold their stories to the tabloids. The result could be a veritable list of the supermarket tabs’ sources and leakers from a dozen years ago.
Like a tabloid Richard Nixon, National Enquirer and Globe writer Jim Mitteager taped most of his conversations about Jackson when he covered the story in 1993-94.
Mitteager, who was later dismissed from the papers for sexual harassment, talks to his sources and his editors very candidly.
The result is a revealing look at how the tabs salivated to get the most salacious story about Jackson, often disregarding the exact truth for kernels of plausible items that could be inflated into screaming front-page headlines.
Mitteager bequeathed the tapes to Paul Barresi, a self-styled investigator, trusting him to “do the right thing with them.” Barresi thought the tapes had value, but could not have guessed what historical importance they would acquire.
Mitteager inadvertently kept a record of much of what is in the news today concerning Hollywood’s underbelly. The tapes include anecdotes about many celebrities and lawyers, as well as incarcerated private eye Anthony Pellicano, who once worked for Jackson.
Barresi has a long history of involvement with the Jackson story.
In 1993, the pop star’s former cook and housekeeper, Philip and Stella LeMarque, asked him to sell their story about sexual abuse at Neverland.
The LeMarques, who were slight acquaintances of Barresi, had only worked at Neverland for about 10 months and left after the first molestation case broke in 1991.
Like many disgruntled former Jackson employees, the LeMarques are now on Sneddon’s witness list. The Quindoys, another couple who also sold their story, are ready to testify as well.
But Barresi realized early on that the LeMarques were probably not telling the truth.
“I concluded that it was all about the money and not about protecting a child from a predator,” he told me.
The couple, he said, began embellishing their story when they came to believe they could get $500,000 for it. In the end, they received nothing.
Barresi wound up turning over his taped interviews with the couple to then-Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti. They are now in the hands of Jackson’s prosecutor.
The coup de grace, Barresi says, happened later, when he listened to Mitteager’s tapes. On one of them, it’s noted that the LeMarques had tried to sell their story of child molestation at Neverland long before the first case broke in 1991.
“They couldn’t get any takers,” recalls Barresi. “But why didn’t they just go to the police?”
Often the Globe printed stories, written by Mitteager, that were based on the flimsiest of evidence.
Mitteager, at least in the case of Jackson, relied heavily on a sketchy stringer named Taylea Shea. Her veracity consequently became integral to a lot of tabloid reporting at the time.
Shea, who seems to have gone by a number of aliases and had a long list of addresses and phone numbers, could not be contacted for this story, despite many tries.
Neighbors at the Los Angeles address at which she lived the longest do not remember her fondly. They recall a hustler and con woman who was always on the take.
“She should be in jail, if she hasn’t been already,” one former friend and neighbor said.
On one tape, Shea reads what sounds convincingly like a legal document drawn up between Jackson and a 12-year-old boy named Brandon P. Richmond, who is represented by his mother, Eva Richmond.
Brandon, according to the document, received $600,000 from Jackson. He and Jackson would no longer have any contact with each other.
Shea read the document, which is dated July 1992, to Mitteager the following year.
This would have been a blockbuster, if true, because it would make Brandon, not the differently-named boy who settled with Jackson in 1993, the first of Jackson’s accusers.
Shea also says on the tape that the legal document came from the offices of famed Hollywood lawyer Bert Fields, Jackson’s attorney at the time.
No reason is given why Jackson and Brandon Richmond should be separated. The implication, however, is clear.
The Globe published the story without using names. Over time, it was assumed that Brandon P. Richmond was in fact Brandon Adams, a boy who had appeared in Jackson’s “Moonwalker” video.
Discussions on the tapes indicate that the tabloids also believed the two Brandons were one and the same. But there’s a problem with Shea’s story: Nothing adds up.
For one thing, a source close to Fields says the document uses language uncommon to their usual agreements.
Then there’s the actual family.
According to the Adamses, whom I met in January, they don’t know an Eva Richmond.
Brandon Adams’ mother is named Marquita Woods. And Brandon’s grandmother assures me she knows nothing of a $600,000 payment. The family has lived in a modest home in Baldwin Hills, Calif., for 30 years.
Brandon Adams, who is now 25, is a struggling actor. He appeared in “D2: The Mighty Ducks” and the indie film “MacArthur Park,” and is currently working on building a music career.
“I wish I had $600,000,” he said. “I’m broke.”
The Adamses pointed out that Brandon never visited Neverland, just the Jackson family home in Encino.
For a short time they were friendly not only with the Jacksons, but with Sean Lennon and his mother Yoko Ono, who were also part of “Moonwalker.” But the relationship seems to have ended well before Taylea Shea’s big scoop.
Was Shea simply lying to Mitteager to collect a big fee? It would seem so.
On the tapes, Mitteager tells an editor that Shea also has “shocking” material about David Geffen and Keanu Reeves, among others. None of it would turn out to be true, but all of it was tabloid fodder that spread to more mainstream publications for a short time.
Curiously, nobody I spoke with who worked at the tabloids could remember Shea. And her own alleged main source — an attorney then associated with the office of Larry Feldman, the first accuser’s lawyer — insists vehemently that she did not know Shea and had little knowledge of the case anyway.
Suddenly, the value of the Mitteager tapes takes on a new meaning.
Barresi, a sometime investigator and tabloid source in the past, is aware that he’s in possession of materials that demonstrate how the supermarket tabloids operated in their heyday — the era of O.J. Simpson, Jackson and other scandals.
But one tabloid editor still in the business cautioned, “Don’t paint all of us with the same brush. We did a lot of excellent work on Simpson.”
Indeed, though it’s hard to separate them in our minds, the Globe — then under a different owner — had a much lower standard of proof than did the Enquirer in the early 1990s. And Mitteager came from the Globe’s mentality, according to sources with whom I have spoken.
At one point, in running down lists of kids who’d spent time with Jackson, Mitteager rattles off the name of a boy with the conviction that Jackson, who had befriended him, must have also acted inappropriately with him.
But it was only wishful thinking on the part of a tabloid reporter.
It turns out that the boy was 9 years old in 1993 and died shortly thereafter from leukemia. He’d met Jackson through the Make-A-Wish Foundation.
Even Jackson’s staunchest critics would agree that it is hard to fathom how this boy could have been the object of the singer’s romantic interests.
Read also: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/04/11/*****-major-domo-lied-about-cashing-in/
and this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/04/07/former-proteacutegeacute-vouches-for-*****/
21e5ba9a17931f5b774c4f9755d50a7c





Even Roger knows the truth.
 
I’ve been alerted to a story in the British press about Michael Jackson paying off 24 families of children he supposedly molested. Readers of this column must know that I have almost a PhD in Michael Jackson. The story is not true. It’s based on files left behind by a National Enquirer reporter, now dead, called Jim Mitteager. In 2005 I went through tons of Mitteager’s files, re-reporting them. A lot of it was just poppycock. Read this whole column I published back then. I did a lot of work on it. As devil’s advocate, I tried to find someone who would say they were molested by Michael Jackson. No one would because, I think, no one had been.
From March 2005, c2013 Showbiz411.com
Was there a kid who made a deal with Michael Jackson before his first accuser settled with the pop star for $20 million in 1993?
Tape recordings left behind by a deceased National Enquirer reporter would suggest there was, but on closer inspection, it turns out there probably wasn’t.
In fact, the tapes show that there was a zealous push on the part of the supermarket tabloids 12 years ago to find any boy who might have been abused by Jackson.
This will be a disappointment for Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon, who has not been able to produce any other Jackson “victims” so far.
On Monday, Judge Rodney Melville will hold a hearing to determine whether or not Jackson’s “prior” acts can be brought into this trial.
If they are allowed, what could they be and where did they come from? And are they real?
Sneddon is prepared to subpoena every ex-Jackson employee and cop who was involved in the first case, even those who’ve since sold their stories to the tabloids. The result could be a veritable list of the supermarket tabs’ sources and leakers from a dozen years ago.
Like a tabloid Richard Nixon, National Enquirer and Globe writer Jim Mitteager taped most of his conversations about Jackson when he covered the story in 1993-94.
Mitteager, who was later dismissed from the papers for sexual harassment, talks to his sources and his editors very candidly.
The result is a revealing look at how the tabs salivated to get the most salacious story about Jackson, often disregarding the exact truth for kernels of plausible items that could be inflated into screaming front-page headlines.
Mitteager bequeathed the tapes to Paul Barresi, a self-styled investigator, trusting him to “do the right thing with them.” Barresi thought the tapes had value, but could not have guessed what historical importance they would acquire.
Mitteager inadvertently kept a record of much of what is in the news today concerning Hollywood’s underbelly. The tapes include anecdotes about many celebrities and lawyers, as well as incarcerated private eye Anthony Pellicano, who once worked for Jackson.
Barresi has a long history of involvement with the Jackson story.
In 1993, the pop star’s former cook and housekeeper, Philip and Stella LeMarque, asked him to sell their story about sexual abuse at Neverland.
The LeMarques, who were slight acquaintances of Barresi, had only worked at Neverland for about 10 months and left after the first molestation case broke in 1991.
Like many disgruntled former Jackson employees, the LeMarques are now on Sneddon’s witness list. The Quindoys, another couple who also sold their story, are ready to testify as well.
But Barresi realized early on that the LeMarques were probably not telling the truth.
“I concluded that it was all about the money and not about protecting a child from a predator,” he told me.
The couple, he said, began embellishing their story when they came to believe they could get $500,000 for it. In the end, they received nothing.
Barresi wound up turning over his taped interviews with the couple to then-Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti. They are now in the hands of Jackson’s prosecutor.
The coup de grace, Barresi says, happened later, when he listened to Mitteager’s tapes. On one of them, it’s noted that the LeMarques had tried to sell their story of child molestation at Neverland long before the first case broke in 1991.
“They couldn’t get any takers,” recalls Barresi. “But why didn’t they just go to the police?”
Often the Globe printed stories, written by Mitteager, that were based on the flimsiest of evidence.
Mitteager, at least in the case of Jackson, relied heavily on a sketchy stringer named Taylea Shea. Her veracity consequently became integral to a lot of tabloid reporting at the time.
Shea, who seems to have gone by a number of aliases and had a long list of addresses and phone numbers, could not be contacted for this story, despite many tries.
Neighbors at the Los Angeles address at which she lived the longest do not remember her fondly. They recall a hustler and con woman who was always on the take.
“She should be in jail, if she hasn’t been already,” one former friend and neighbor said.
On one tape, Shea reads what sounds convincingly like a legal document drawn up between Jackson and a 12-year-old boy named Brandon P. Richmond, who is represented by his mother, Eva Richmond.
Brandon, according to the document, received $600,000 from Jackson. He and Jackson would no longer have any contact with each other.
Shea read the document, which is dated July 1992, to Mitteager the following year.
This would have been a blockbuster, if true, because it would make Brandon, not the differently-named boy who settled with Jackson in 1993, the first of Jackson’s accusers.
Shea also says on the tape that the legal document came from the offices of famed Hollywood lawyer Bert Fields, Jackson’s attorney at the time.
No reason is given why Jackson and Brandon Richmond should be separated. The implication, however, is clear.
The Globe published the story without using names. Over time, it was assumed that Brandon P. Richmond was in fact Brandon Adams, a boy who had appeared in Jackson’s “Moonwalker” video.
Discussions on the tapes indicate that the tabloids also believed the two Brandons were one and the same. But there’s a problem with Shea’s story: Nothing adds up.
For one thing, a source close to Fields says the document uses language uncommon to their usual agreements.
Then there’s the actual family.
According to the Adamses, whom I met in January, they don’t know an Eva Richmond.
Brandon Adams’ mother is named Marquita Woods. And Brandon’s grandmother assures me she knows nothing of a $600,000 payment. The family has lived in a modest home in Baldwin Hills, Calif., for 30 years.
Brandon Adams, who is now 25, is a struggling actor. He appeared in “D2: The Mighty Ducks” and the indie film “MacArthur Park,” and is currently working on building a music career.
“I wish I had $600,000,” he said. “I’m broke.”
The Adamses pointed out that Brandon never visited Neverland, just the Jackson family home in Encino.
For a short time they were friendly not only with the Jacksons, but with Sean Lennon and his mother Yoko Ono, who were also part of “Moonwalker.” But the relationship seems to have ended well before Taylea Shea’s big scoop.
Was Shea simply lying to Mitteager to collect a big fee? It would seem so.
On the tapes, Mitteager tells an editor that Shea also has “shocking” material about David Geffen and Keanu Reeves, among others. None of it would turn out to be true, but all of it was tabloid fodder that spread to more mainstream publications for a short time.
Curiously, nobody I spoke with who worked at the tabloids could remember Shea. And her own alleged main source — an attorney then associated with the office of Larry Feldman, the first accuser’s lawyer — insists vehemently that she did not know Shea and had little knowledge of the case anyway.
Suddenly, the value of the Mitteager tapes takes on a new meaning.
Barresi, a sometime investigator and tabloid source in the past, is aware that he’s in possession of materials that demonstrate how the supermarket tabloids operated in their heyday — the era of O.J. Simpson, Jackson and other scandals.
But one tabloid editor still in the business cautioned, “Don’t paint all of us with the same brush. We did a lot of excellent work on Simpson.”
Indeed, though it’s hard to separate them in our minds, the Globe — then under a different owner — had a much lower standard of proof than did the Enquirer in the early 1990s. And Mitteager came from the Globe’s mentality, according to sources with whom I have spoken.
At one point, in running down lists of kids who’d spent time with Jackson, Mitteager rattles off the name of a boy with the conviction that Jackson, who had befriended him, must have also acted inappropriately with him.
But it was only wishful thinking on the part of a tabloid reporter.
It turns out that the boy was 9 years old in 1993 and died shortly thereafter from leukemia. He’d met Jackson through the Make-A-Wish Foundation.
Even Jackson’s staunchest critics would agree that it is hard to fathom how this boy could have been the object of the singer’s romantic interests.
Read also: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/04/11/*****-major-domo-lied-about-cashing-in/
and this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/04/07/former-proteacutegeacute-vouches-for-*****/
21e5ba9a17931f5b774c4f9755d50a7c



Even Roger knows the truth. I am only posting Roger because he is saying what I was saying.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's such a corrupt agenda going on here. They removed all the info that points out the B.S. they are publishing.

Slimy bastards! There were some great comments on there when I looked last night. Hopefully a lot of their brainwashed readers already saw the article WITH the comments!

Okay, it's Monday, the Estate needs to take more action today, this is getting out of hand! We can't fight this war by ourselves but we sure as hell can try.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

weitzman was involved in 93 though. maybe they are of the mentality of if we say something it will make it bigger and it will be forgotten about soon enough. aslong as one etc do well they arent bothered and think the last twenty years made no difference

during the 2005 trial, Weizman was interviewed to comment on the trial, he was hardly supportive of MJ. Even when he talked about Wade Robson he was not that passionate like Mez.

I don't believe Weitzman will go against Murdoch .
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's a tabloid relax. People are not buying this shit. Tmz has not even jumped on it. Pelicano never worked for the FBI. FBI released there filed in 09 they had nothing. It will go away. Weizmann will respond his name is on one of the documents. This too shall pass. Shamone! This trail will be over in about a month. AEG will have try whatever they can but... They need to be careful the Jacksons are winning! **** the haters!
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I hope fans are texting and emailing TOm Joyner. I have not heard this story until I turned to his show. He quoted this paper just morning and I was livid. Respond to Tom, Sybil Wilkes, and J Anthony BRown. Jokes or not jokes, this idoits need to be educated on the Facts of MJ. The talk like they love MJ but they quote lies.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Murdoch has nothing to do with the mirror etc

during the 2005 trial, Weizman was interviewed to comment on the trial, he was hardly supportive of MJ. Even when he talked about Wade Robson he was not that passionate like Mez.

I don't believe Weitzman will go against Murdoch .
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's a tabloid relax. People are not buying this shit. Tmz has not even jumped on it. Pelicano never worked for the FBI. FBI released there filed in 09 they had nothing. It will go away. Weizmann will respond his name is on one of the documents. This too shall pass. Shamone! This trail will be over in about a month. AEG will have try whatever they can but... They need to be careful the Jacksons are winning! **** the haters!

Well, TOm Joyner is buying it because it say FBI. This is whY I say, go text or email Tom. You can even go to www.blackamericaweb.com and see they have the story posted. Fans should respond to it.
 
Re: FANS of MJ. EMIAL TOM JOYNER about MJ.

Tom needs to be slammed for reporting that bs...
 
Re: FANS of MJ. EMIAL TOM JOYNER about MJ.

Tom needs to be slammed for reporting that bs...
Exactly. That was the only place I heard this story. I am responding to TOm and I suggest fans do it as well.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Look at their twitter, so unprofessional and disgusting. http://twitter.com/thesundaypeople

Here's one example:
@thesundaypeople
Do you prefer ***** ***** or Wackson McJackson? MT @dianalauratelle: @thesundaypeople Stop calling him *****.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Look at their twitter, so unprofessional and disgusting. http://twitter.com/thesundaypeople

Here's one example:
@thesundaypeople
Do you prefer ***** ***** or Wackson McJackson? MT @dianalauratelle: @thesundaypeople Stop calling him *****.

Jesus... they are horrible. I wonder if Wade's people are behind all this ish being published now. It seems he was unable to round up any other supporters to come forward with lurid tales of child abuse. So, this must have been Plan B since The Today Show didn't work out so well for him.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Look at their twitter, so unprofessional and disgusting. http://twitter.com/thesundaypeople

Here's one example:
@thesundaypeople
Do you prefer ***** ***** or Wackson McJackson? MT @dianalauratelle: @thesundaypeople Stop calling him *****.

That means a bunch of fools work at that place. People like this you can only pray for them and leave them in GOd's hands. People who are willing to treat and write lies about people are often dealing with demons in thier lives. YOu have to be a sick person willing to work for a company that is willing to make a living off of lying on people.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Jesus... they are horrible. I wonder if Wade's people are behind all this ish being published now. It seems he was unable to round up any other supporters to come forward with lurid tales of child abuse. So, this must have been Plan B since The Today Show didn't work out so well for him.
I believe Wade is behind this.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Wade and/or AEG maybe.

I'm curious to see who bought WR's condo so he could scoot out of town so quickly when his allegations were coming out...

Bingo! Tell me about it. And he got $100,000 more than the asking price. WTF is that all about?
 
Back
Top