Latest on MJJC

Dateline NBC tonight, 9pm E.T with Rabbi Boteach's tapes

Larry King really has no scruples. He gets invited by the family to both the public memorial and private funeral and yet he allows snakes like Arnie Klein and the fake rabbi to spread their filthy opinions about Michael on his show. I'm gonna tell Larry just how I feel about the fake rabbi! Maybe Larry will have some hard hitting questions for him.


Here is the link where you can send questions that you want Larry to ask the FAKE RABBI:

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.lkl.html


Here is the comment that I sent to Larry:


My question/comment is for you Larry. You are invited to the Jackson family by Michael's public memorial and private funeral and yet you invite such SNAKES on to your show to spread their filthy opinions about Michael and make money off of him. Let me just tell you that this Rabbi Schmuley Boteach is NO FRIEND OF MICHAEL JACKSON'S. This Rabbi has abused Michael's confidentiality and released these private tapes saying that Michael would have wanted this. If so, why hadn't he released them and wrote the book while Michael was alive?? Rabbi Schumuley and Michael got together to do charity work together for 'Heal the Kids'. But guess what, they had a falling out because the (fake) Rabbi had been stealing funds from charities. Since you already booked this shmuck on your show, at least be a hard hitter and ask him why he did not do this while Michael was alive. Oh yeah, the fake Rabbi is clearly not a Holy man and other Rabbis are questioning his ethics in breaching his confidentiality with Michael.

I am going to send you some articles about Rabbi Schmuley Boteach and I hope you get a chance to read them before you interview him.

http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/story.htm?sid=8&id=253140

(Another one will follow in a second email because I have to copy and paste the text)

Sincerely,
Elmari
 
Last edited:
Go figure: Its Larry King-Show, special guest fake Rabbi, and nobody is watching! Attendance figures: 0 % !
lol7.gif
 
ensleyave said:
In the book, he said paraphasing here she told him what they were and were not going to do or go. She wanted to remake him. She was too sexually agressive. She would be mean to his fans if they wanted an autograph even if the fans were children. She would tell them to go away. She would call him up at and she would say that she is putting her fingers between he legs. He would say Madonna PLEASE. She would say I want you to rub yourself and think of me. When he would see her again she would say this is the finger I used last night. She would show him books of women in bondage. He just did not like that. He was a romantic. He felt there should be some mystery in a relationship and marriage. So it doesn't get boring. He felt couples shouldn't spend every moment together so you can miss one another. He also thought a relationship should be innocent and not do everything and anything with your bodies. He does contradict himself somewhat. We all do don't we.
He was HUMAN HUMAN HUMAN. I am still a fan.
Click to expand...
I agree. Mike was keepin it real, just being Mike. We all speak on how we feel more directly and honestly when we're not at work or in public.

I think he didn't like the way our society has become so obsessed with sex, but it doesn't mean he was a stoic. Many of us are just like him, aren't we? He comes across as the kind of guy who prefered to think and talk about sex as a more private thing. He had porn and liked sexy women just like many other men do and AT THE SAME TIME, he viewed brining more romantic elements to sex as more ideal in society and paint a lovely picture of him and his woman in that way.

We don't have to take things too seriously, I mean, the things he said about how things went between him and Madonna. We're all grieving and emotions are running high and that can make it hard for us to step back and take things in a lighthearted manner. But, these episodes between Mike and Madonna, I think it's funny:D I can clearly see she had a mad crush on him, but didn't know how to approach him the right way. She wasn't his type for sure. Picture them arguing with each other, it's just like two friends having a heated debate on love and romance and all the serious stuff. They had different views, that's all.

:lol: She was tryin to have a phone sex with him, dang:hysterical: She believed it would stimulate him, but she didn't know he was not into that kind of stuff or wouldn't adjust her ways even knowing that. I think maybe he laughed it off thinking to himself "Dayum, ol' girl is wile'(=wild)"

ensleyave said:
MJ: she (Madonna) did a lot of crazy things and that's how that went. I knew we had nothing in common. But I am pretty sure that having a baby has to change you. I don't know how much she has changed. I'm sure she is a better person than before. Paraphrasing She is not sexy at all. I think sexy comes from the heart in the way you present yourself.
S Boteach: Have you ever found women who are a bit more modest to be more attractive for that reason?
MJ: Yeah. I don't like womenwho are always saying, "My nails need to be done. I have to do my toes. I need a manicure." I hate all that. I lke it whe girls are a little bit more tomboyish. IF they wrestle, climb a tree..... I love that. It is sexier to me. I like class, though. Class is everything.
Click to expand...
Thank you for posting the excerpts ensleyave!!! The bolded part made my day cuz I'm exactly that kind of girl he likes:wild: Wow, I never imagined I would know he had described his type the way I describe myself as a woman, WOW!!! Hard to calm myself down!!!:wild:
 
Last edited:
Right! Nothing ist wrong with Michaels words, but with Schmuleys gossip !
As well, Michaels words are privacy. This fake Rabbi have absolut no business doing that!
Its like a striptease..poor Michael...GOSH !
 
A good friend of mine who's a huge MJ fan, all his life....believes that this Rabbi's intentions are good. He said that ET asked this Rabbi why he's doing this, releasing the tapes and such...the Rabbi said he wanted the whole world to see a much different side of Michael, of his friend Michael. It sure sounds positive and good if you think about it like that....but i don't see much fans of the Rabbi here :)
 
I though the Rabbi said hes donating the proceeds to charity? I am kinda annoyed with this man, but I agree with staffordshire^. I believe hes releasig these to let people know the different side of Michael. IDK.
 
Yeah right. He has 30 hrs of recordings. He's releasing parts of the tape to push his agenda , to show Michael the way HE wants to portray Michael. I watched parts of it on You tube and its obvious its highly edited. This guy has been highly critical of MJ. Supported Nancy Grace and co during the trial. Said all sorts of bad things about MJ. He said he stopped talking to Mike because he was accused , not the other way around. Dont you thing he has an agenda. MJ didn't want these tapes released. I dont care what Jackass says.
 
I read through all of these 41 pages worth of this discussion... What's there to add? I'd like to thank those who transcribed parts of the interview here and also the one who posted the link to the complete transcrpit! I'm sorry, I forget your names but I'm sure you know who you are! :)

I read the transcript, well mostly just Michael's parts as his thoughts were the ones I wanted to read about. Though I read it and was touched, I too concur that publishing the tapes constitutes a very grave breach of privacy and trust. The book shouldn't have been published at all. However, if the "rabbi" (sorry, but he just isn't a real rabbi) insisted on publishing it (which he obviously did), then he should have released just the conversations and no commentary of his own. It still would have been bad, but I would have been tempted to buy it just to gain some insight into Michael. As it stands, I'm not touching the book. I'd still like to read Michael's thoughts but I couldn't stomach the "rabbi's" comments. I don't think Michael said anything that would make me think less of him. Quite the contrary, I think of him even a bit more highly now - if possible. So, if the "rabbi" was hoping to use Michael as a warning example of a wasted life (???!!), he'd better think again.

Actually, this "rabbi" is getting on my very last nerve! Pffftt... And I keep typing "rabbo"... Well, that's a good enough title for him. LOL! He shouldn't have violated Michael's trust like this. Hopefully the book will flop and maybe he'll get other consequences too. He is not a trustworthy member of his vocation, this "America's Rabbi" (hybris much?)!

Oy, I got a good laugh from the "Groupie" T-shirt! Who would want to be a rabbi's groupie anyway, much less for this turner of tricks? Yeah, I know he just means follower/admirer whatever but still... Hahaha!
 
MJ: Yeah. I don't like womenwho are always saying, "My nails need to be done. I have to do my toes. I need a manicure." I hate all that. I lke it whe girls are a little bit more tomboyish. IF they wrestle, climb a tree..... I love that. It is sexier to me. I like class, though. Class is everything.--------------------Michael would have LOVED me; however, I do like to keep my does done and nails but I will do it myself and still wrestle with Michael and climb trees.
 
*MissChanel* said:
There is nothing wrong with what Michael says at all so who cares if they show these tapes
Click to expand...

Because Michael never authorized their release. If he did, no documentation for that was ever given. If Michael authorized this, why did not Boteach release all this before Michael died? He's NO friend of Michael's and it's an issue of respect. IMHO, Boteach has a history of ripping Michael off and betraying him (Heal the Kids Foundation). Michael cut him out of his life, totally, and not the other way around.

These tapes appear to be from private "counseling sessions." As a supposedly "religious" man, Boteach's responsibility was to maintain privacy about the revelations of such private thoughts, in any setting. This very much smacks of Bashir, and falls into the same category of betrayal. I very much doubt any of the profits will find their ways to any charity. I'm hoping NO ONE here buys his book, but that is a matter of personal choice. . . . .
 
Victoria83 said:
Because Michael never authorized their release. If he did, no documentation for that was ever given. If Michael authorized this, why did not Boteach release all this before Michael died? He's NO friend of Michael's and it's an issue of respect. IMHO, Boteach has a history of ripping Michael off and betraying him (Heal the Kids Foundation). Michael cut him out of his life, totally, and not the other way around.

These tapes appear to be from private "counseling sessions." As a supposedly "religious" man, Boteach's responsibility was to maintain privacy about the revelations of such private thoughts, in any setting. This very much smacks of Bashir, and falls into the same category of betrayal. I very much doubt any of the profits will find their ways to any charity. I'm hoping NO ONE here buys his book, but that is a matter of personal choice. . . . .
Click to expand...

:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
Look Michael did not say those things in public. That was meant to be private.
While Madonna said some pretty mean things about Michael in the past in PUBLIC!

It's not even Michael's fault that the scumbag released the tapes for the whole world to hear.Besides, people seem to agree with Michael anyway. Madonna used to be that kind of girl back in the day. In terms of success, they might be peers but in talent, I think not. =p Madonna's talented but Michael is in a different category from her. =P
 
I actually enjoyed reading excerpts from the book, listening to Michael's actual voice on youtube, and I plan on buying the book at a discounted price (right now the only book I paid full price for is the OPUS). :)

Since I've also been a lifelong fan of Lisa Marie Presley since 1977, I especially enjoyed the parts about her & Michael, and also Madonna. I grew up with these people, thus my interest. There's nothing in the tapes that make me love Michael less, nor change my opinion about Madonna, it was more a validation. Madonna has grown up, paid honor to Michael at the MTV Awards, I feel sorry for her loss, obviously she was in love with Michael (as I'm sure many women were) & was jealous when he chose LMP instead of her, thus her catty comments at the time. ;)

What was a bit of a revelation for me was the part about LMP. I mean I knew she didn't want to have Michael's kids (btw I'm positive now she feels regret, guilt about this; she should have never listened to her mother, ex-husband, and all those that did their best to tear them apart). :( But I didn't realize that Michael rejected her attempts to get back together & have his kids! *light bulb goes on*. Yes, I saw that even after the divorce they remained friends & she was seen kissing him at her 30th birthday party, she accompanied him & his mother to Africa, took her kids with her on tour with him, et al. But I didn't know that she wrote him love letters, saying she would have his kids, basically begging him to get back together with her. WOW!!!!

Now I see why all her songs have so much bitterness toward Michael, especially her first CD "To Whom It May Concern". I always knew the first song "S.O.B" was about Michael, but not until after his death did I realize "INDIFFERENT" was also about him. Btw, FYI, as a lifelong LMP fan I'm pretty sure I know whom each song is about off her first album:

1.) S.O.B. = Michael Jackson (her relationship with him, how she lost her trust in him, how he said she was something she was not e.g. Princess of Rock, et al)
2.) The Road Between = Danny Keough (her first husband, their tumultuous relationship)
3.) Lights Out = her childhood at Graceland; realization that when she dies she'll be buried in the backyard
4.) Better Beware = Michael Jackson? (seems like, especially now, btw another favorite of mine)
5.) Nobody Noticed It = her father Elvis (my personal favorite; could apply to Michael here as well) :(
6.) Sinking In = Danny Keough (her first husband, their tumultuous relationship)
7.) Important = herself (her demons, her self-absorption, et al)
8.) So Lovely = her children Ben & Riley, how they saved her, her love for them
9.) Indifferent = Michael Jackson (her trying to be indifferent, but can't remain so because she knows the outcome, that is his death) :(
10.) Gone = Nicolas Cage (her 3rd husband, obvious since she used to call him "daddy")
11.) To Whom It May Concern = her outcry against the injustice of drugging kids/putting them on medication in school (another favorite of mine)

I kinda feel sorry for Lisa because Michael was so hard-hearted against her, but then I don't blame him, burned once, who wants to try again? If only Michael was more forgiving. It seems like once you betrayed him, that was it, no one-two-three times you're out. Just once is all! 8^O I would like to hear Lisa's side of the story. It seems these two souls were kinda meant for each other, but just couldn't get it right. They couldn't get each other out of their systems, as evidenced by their songs years later, battling it out via song, lol. At least a couple of Michael's songs were more romantic in regards to Lisa, not so hers. :( I wonder how it made Michael feel when Lisa had her twins last October & they (along with her husband Michael Lockwood) were featured on the front cover of PEOPLE magazine... *proverbial nail in the coffin, or so it seems to me*

Last note, I agree with the poster that stated Michael's fantasy of Princess Diana was perfect for him, as she could always remain on a pedestal ~ the perfect partner/companion ~ that he could not have, thus her perfection. It takes a heck of a lot more to be in a real relationship, with all its ups & downs. :(

ps: I'm not surprised that he loved women that were both ladies (like his mother & sisters Latoya & Rebbie) & tomboys like his sister Janet. :) He was the perfect gentleman, always, he deserved someone like himself (i.e. a true lady in every sense of the word). If only he had married Princess Diana back in 1981 ~ both pure ~ both perfect & old-fashioned, the BEST! Bravo, Michael, Bravo, I love & agree with your choice of women. :)
 
I cannot believe any MJ fan would line this fake Rabbi, this thief's pocket. If I see his book anywhere, I will walk right past it. I am disgusted by him.
 
Nadine66 said:
I kinda feel sorry for Lisa because Michael was so hard-hearted against her, but then I don't blame him, burned once, who wants to try again? If only Michael was more forgiving. It seems like once you betrayed him, that was it, no one-two-three times you're out. Just once is all! 8^O I would like to hear Lisa's side of the story. It seems these two souls were kinda meant for each other, but just couldn't get it right. They couldn't get each other out of their systems, as evidenced by their songs years later, battling it out via song, lol. At least a couple of Michael's songs were more romantic in regards to Lisa, not so hers. :( I wonder how it made Michael feel when Lisa had her twins last October & they (along with her husband Michael Lockwood) were featured on the front cover of PEOPLE magazine... *proverbial nail in the coffin, or so it seems to me*

Last note, I agree with the poster that stated Michael's fantasy of Princess Diana was perfect for him, as she could always remain on a pedestal ~ the perfect partner/companion ~ that he could not have, thus her perfection. It takes a heck of a lot more to be in a real relationship, with all its ups & downs. :(

ps: I'm not surprised that he loved women that were both ladies (like his mother & sisters Latoya & Rebbie) & tomboys like his sister Janet. :) He was the perfect gentleman, always, he deserved someone like himself (i.e. a true lady in every sense of the word). If only he had married Princess Diana back in 1981 ~ both pure ~ both perfect & old-fashioned, the BEST! Bravo, Michael, Bravo, I love & agree with your choice of women. :)
Click to expand...

My friend Diana was growing to be a superstar and no she had mental problems before she met Charles so this notion that she was perfect and old-fashioned was not true. Anyway they would be a mismatch from the beginning as she was meant for the throne or to produce heirs to the throne. Also LMP had her chance and she blew it, so worried about losing her daddy's money that she faked the role and then got blasted by Michael. I agree with you about Mike, he somewhat has the Virgo tendency to cut you off and you stay off for a very long time or forever.
 
Nadine66 said:
I actually enjoyed reading excerpts from the book, listening to Michael's actual voice on youtube, and I plan on buying the book at a discounted price (right now the only book I paid full price for is the OPUS). :)

Since I've also been a lifelong fan of Lisa Marie Presley since 1977, I especially enjoyed the parts about her & Michael, and also Madonna. I grew up with these people, thus my interest. There's nothing in the tapes that make me love Michael less, nor change my opinion about Madonna, it was more a validation. Madonna has grown up, paid honor to Michael at the MTV Awards, I feel sorry for her loss, obviously she was in love with Michael (as I'm sure many women were) & was jealous when he chose LMP instead of her, thus her catty comments at the time. ;)

What was a bit of a revelation for me was the part about LMP. I mean I knew she didn't want to have Michael's kids (btw I'm positive now she feels regret, guilt about this; she should have never listened to her mother, ex-husband, and all those that did their best to tear them apart). :( But I didn't realize that Michael rejected her attempts to get back together & have his kids! *light bulb goes on*. Yes, I saw that even after the divorce they remained friends & she was seen kissing him at her 30th birthday party, she accompanied him & his mother to Africa, took her kids with her on tour with him, et al. But I didn't know that she wrote him love letters, saying she would have his kids, basically begging him to get back together with her. WOW!!!!

Now I see why all her songs have so much bitterness toward Michael, especially her first CD "To Whom It May Concern". I always knew the first song "S.O.B" was about Michael, but not until after his death did I realize "INDIFFERENT" was also about him. Btw, FYI, as a lifelong LMP fan I'm pretty sure I know whom each song is about off her first album:

1.) S.O.B. = Michael Jackson (her relationship with him, how she lost her trust in him, how he said she was something she was not e.g. Princess of Rock, et al)
2.) The Road Between = Danny Keough (her first husband, their tumultuous relationship)
3.) Lights Out = her childhood at Graceland; realization that when she dies she'll be buried in the backyard
4.) Better Beware = Michael Jackson? (seems like, especially now, btw another favorite of mine)
5.) Nobody Noticed It = her father Elvis (my personal favorite; could apply to Michael here as well) :(
6.) Sinking In = Danny Keough (her first husband, their tumultuous relationship)
7.) Important = herself (her demons, her self-absorption, et al)
8.) So Lovely = her children Ben & Riley, how they saved her, her love for them
9.) Indifferent = Michael Jackson (her trying to be indifferent, but can't remain so because she knows the outcome, that is his death) :(
10.) Gone = Nicolas Cage (her 3rd husband, obvious since she used to call him "daddy")
11.) To Whom It May Concern = her outcry against the injustice of drugging kids/putting them on medication in school (another favorite of mine)

I kinda feel sorry for Lisa because Michael was so hard-hearted against her, but then I don't blame him, burned once, who wants to try again? If only Michael was more forgiving. It seems like once you betrayed him, that was it, no one-two-three times you're out. Just once is all! 8^O I would like to hear Lisa's side of the story. It seems these two souls were kinda meant for each other, but just couldn't get it right. They couldn't get each other out of their systems, as evidenced by their songs years later, battling it out via song, lol. At least a couple of Michael's songs were more romantic in regards to Lisa, not so hers. :( I wonder how it made Michael feel when Lisa had her twins last October & they (along with her husband Michael Lockwood) were featured on the front cover of PEOPLE magazine... *proverbial nail in the coffin, or so it seems to me*

Last note, I agree with the poster that stated Michael's fantasy of Princess Diana was perfect for him, as she could always remain on a pedestal ~ the perfect partner/companion ~ that he could not have, thus her perfection. It takes a heck of a lot more to be in a real relationship, with all its ups & downs. :(

ps: I'm not surprised that he loved women that were both ladies (like his mother & sisters Latoya & Rebbie) & tomboys like his sister Janet. :) He was the perfect gentleman, always, he deserved someone like himself (i.e. a true lady in every sense of the word). If only he had married Princess Diana back in 1981 ~ both pure ~ both perfect & old-fashioned, the BEST! Bravo, Michael, Bravo, I love & agree with your choice of women. :)
Click to expand...

Thanks for post this.
I like Lisa Marie and I think that she loved him so much and they were great couple.
 
Mods,

How come these are allowed to be published here @ MJJC? I find them unsettling, we don't know for sure that Michael authorised them to be released. I know that Michael's privacy is highly protected and respected here, and quite rightly so. Just wondering why these are allowed?
 
The rabbi was on HLN's 'Showbiz Tonight' and if you missed it just wait till tomorrow where you can get a transcript of the interview.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top