It wasn't secret (they even married eventually), just these kinds of things were overlooked for decades, or even accepted as a "rock & roll" thing.If he truly had a relationship with her when he was 47 and she was 13....then I can understand this, because that's absolutely nuts. Why all of a sudden this comes out now I don't understand at all though. Had it been a secret all those years?
If he truly had a relationship with her when he was 47 and she was 13....then I can understand this, because that's absolutely nuts. Why all of a sudden this comes out now I don't understand at all though. Had it been a secret all those years?
But when I cuss at MeToo it's because of how Mike is still being treated. People see something, no evidence or anything and so easily he's boycotted and what not. It seems these companies (in this case the venue boss of Paradiso Amsterdam) is driven so far into their MeToo tainted way of thinking that they don't even seem to want to bother investigating it for themselves a little. Nah let's just cancel it all.
Pathetic way of thinking and I hope we get rid of this horrible new way of thinking, or more like.... lack of any thinking, any common sense.
It is backfiring now. it will get worst when people who they like start getting accused. Joe Biden has been accused and people are going off because people put everyone under the same roof and every case is different and this is going too far. Some people are even saying it on tv. Again, I think with MJ it was/is more a media hype than overall public still (of course MJ haters will always talk).No it's wasn't a secret. The Police were even considering prosecuting him but decided against. He married her when she turned 18.
But I really do think the #MeeToo movement will backfire as it's going from one extreme to the other. People are believing the accusers without any fact checking and some poor sod will unfairly get convicted. That's what they are also doing with MJ.
To think about it these "requests for cancel" are most probably initiated by a few self-righteous individuals wanting to feel important, or, as in MJ's case, might be even an orchestrated manipulation. Obeying to their "orders" is actually against the wishes of the majority and borderline censorship. Ironic.
I agree. And some go into "panic" mode. Nobody has time for this (but MJfacts people who are the same people and a small group). even some of the people who trashing MJ on twitter. I think they talk because they are trolls and have nothing to do but get into drama. I challenge 3 of them yesterday and bursted them out to find out they are liars and know nothing and then they leave with some wise crack.
Ha Jacobshagen claims here that he had met MJ in the 2006 when he was in England ( what I think was in 2005 by the way).
But in the King Jordan Interview we really nead uploaded on Youtube he said that he met him the last time in 1999 and had the last phone conversation with him in 2001!!!
Ha Jacobshagen claims here that he had met MJ in the 2006 when he was in England ( what I think was in 2005 by the way).
But in the King Jordan Interview we really need uploaded on Youtube he said that he met him the last time in 1999 and had the last phone conversation with him in 2001!!!
What do you men with this?
Did someone else pick it up already and debunked it?
I think I can't see it as a non twitter member.
wendijane;4254111 said:Good lord the thumbnail on that. Talk about crime stoppers/Most wanted criminals .:coockoo: Near choked on my peanuts.
1nn5;4254130 said:I asked the advocat Noémie Houchet-Tran if she thinks that the Estate as part of her lawsuit against HBO, can ask the channels that have - also - broadcast this documentary compensation from them?
Answer: It seems to me possible yes
No they cannot. They are suing HBO on the ground that they breached a provision in a contract they had entered into with MJ. On what basis would they sue other channels?
If HBO is found to have indeed breached its contractual obligations with MJ, would HBO be responsible towards the estate for damages caused by other channels airing this film? Absolutely.
ozemouze;4254105 said:To think about it these "requests for cancel" are most probably initiated by a few self-righteous individuals wanting to feel important, or, as in MJ's case, might be even an orchestrated manipulation. Obeying to their "orders" is actually against the wishes of the majority and borderline censorship. Ironic.
Ha Jacobshagen claims here that he had met MJ in the 2006 when he was in England ( what I think was in 2005 by the way).
But in the King Jordan Interview we really need uploaded on Youtube he said that he met him the last time in 1999 and had the last phone conversation with him in 2001!!!
This is the King Jordan Radio show you wanted right?
Yes ..... thank you.
Share it guys when someone want to belive this froud.