I would like to hope so. Those comments turned me off of the simpsons tbh. Maybe if fans reach out to Disney they could put it back. Since they own it now they can do whatever they want. They own Family Guy now also, they should remove the "MJ is guilty" related joke-episodes. South Park IMO had the worst trash episodes on MJ.Oh .... do you think Disney where MJ has a special favor for and were always supportive to MJ will bring the episode back as soon as possible after they have bought fox?
What ever happened to Randy Taraborrelli. Didn't he do a couple of biographies on MJ in the past and covered the 2005 trial. I would have expected him to say something about LN.
I would like to hope so. Those comments turned me off of the simpsons tbh. Maybe if fans reach out to Disney they could put it back. Since they own it now they can do whatever they want. They own Family Guy now also, they should remove the "MJ is guilty" related joke-episodes. South Park IMO had the worst trash episodes on MJ.
Titles I am pondering on..
The Wade & James Fact Files: Behind The Curtains of Neverland
The Wade & James Fact Files: Entering Neverland
The Wade & James Fact Files: Smoke and Mirrors around Neverland
The Wade & James Fact Files: Leaving The Lies About Neverland
share thoughts..
‏@mikesmallcombe1
You recorded Safechuck saying he was abused in a building which didn’t exist, and recorded Robson making up the entire opening part of his story. Both falsities proven by documents.
A question for you - why didn’t you check the legitimacy of this @danreed1000?
@Zigmanfreud
Dude, give it up. You see there are these things called math/time. Once Safechuck can’t be abused in the train house until at LEAST mid-1994, then he’s 16 years old & your entire narrative of MJ’s MO, not to mention Safechuck’s lawsuit testimony, gets blown to bits!
#Desperation
@CEThomson
Safechuck’s sworn declaration, signed ‘under penalty of perjury’:
1) Says explicitly that abuse ended in 1992.
2) Only ever recounts seeing Jackson again after ‘92 outside California.
So by defending his story in the show, Dan Reed is accusing his own star witness of perjury.
I like thse:
The Wade & James Fact Files: Behind The Curtains of Neverland . Or better The Wade & James Fact Files: Behind The Curtains of Leaving Neverland . Cause without LEAVING it sounds like it is a bad talk about Neverland, the home. if you know what I mean. But that version may be too long.
The Wade & James Fact Files: Entering Neverland.
The Wade & James Files: The Lies of Leaving Neverland
The timeline isn't possible, no matter how he tries to frame it. He can't push it back because the station wasn't there. He can't push it forward because Safechuck is now 16/17, MJ is married and living on the opposite side of the country. Not to mention any change goes against Safechuck's sworn testimony. Apparently Reed is going down with his ship and he's taking Safechuck with him!
aawww you are smart. Good thinking :kickass:couldn't the ambiguous title "Behind The Curtains Of Neverland" leaving the 'LEAVING' out could get MJ haters to at least start reading it just because of the title.. I mean we all know people will read salacious stories over clean stories.. So why not Pull them in with the title?
couldn't the ambiguous title "Behind The Curtains Of Neverland" leaving the 'LEAVING' out could get MJ haters to at least start reading it just because of the title.. I mean we all know people will read salacious stories over clean stories.. So why not Pull them in with the title?
Titles I am pondering on..
The Wade & James Fact Files: Behind The Curtains of Neverland
The Wade & James Fact Files: Entering Neverland
The Wade & James Fact Files: Smoke and Mirrors around Neverland
The Wade & James Fact Files: Leaving The Lies About Neverland
share thoughts..
yay, let us know how it goesAnd the Document I have been working on has officially been SENT!!!!!!