Best-Selling Author to prove Jackson's innocence in TV Documentary

loveforever

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
1,141
Points
0
This is the great news and I think it hadn't been posted yet.
http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com/2009/12/best-selling-author-to-prove-jacksons.html

In 2005 Aphrodite Jones was one of only two authors granted access to every day of the Michael Jackson trial. With seven New York Times bestsellers under her belt, her book looked set to fly off of shelves when it hit stores.

But when Jones came to write her book she hit wall after her wall. As one of the only journalists willing to admit that Jackson's 2005 trial had proven his innocence once and for all, Jones found that publishing houses were unwilling to give her a deal.

Thomas Mesereau, Jackson's defence lawyer, encountered the same problem. After the trial almost every major publishing house in the US approached him with lucrative book deals. When he maintained that Jackson was truly innocent and he wouldn't write anything to the contrary, every publishing house retracted its offer.

Jurors were offered book deals too. Two jurors claimed after the trial that they really thought Jackson was guilty, but only after they had signed six figure book deals. Other jurors claimed that they had been offered identical deals by the same publishing companies - but only if they too would change their opinion from innocent to guilty, casting enormous doubt over the sincerity of both rogue jurors' u-turns.

One juror, Ray Hultman, lost his publishing deal after it was revealed that his manuscript included portions plagiarised from an inaccurate Vanity Fair article. These included allegations that the former juror couldn't possibly verify, such as claims that Jackson had a detachable nose.

The book was co-written by Stacy Brown, a serial Jackson detractor who also co-wrote a book about the star with Bob Jones, Jackson's former aide. Jones was forced to admit on the stand in 2005 that portions of his book 'The Man Behind The Mask' had been fabricated by Brown in order to boost sales.

Hultman's crediblity was further damaged when it was revealed that after the verdict he had commented to one reporter, "The evidence just wasn't there. We couldn't have gone any other way." A strange comment from a man who would later insist that Jackson had been guilty.

The second juror, Eleanor Cook, also never published her book. Cook's granddaughter caused controversy when she announced during jury deliberations that the juror had already signed a book deal - and had agreed to it in principle before the trial had even begun. Ghostwriter Ernie Cariwel admitted on June 7th 2005 - five days before the verdict was reached in Jackson's trial - that he had already begun writing the book despite never having spoken to Cook.

Fellow jurors slammed the pair two months after the verdict, calling them 'traitors' and claiming that their allegations were 'ridiculous'.

As the publishing industry set about convincing the world that Jackson was guilty - printing books such as 'Be Careful Who You Love' by Diane Dimond, an author who has claimed that her sole aim in life is to destroy Michael Jackson and who writer Ishmael Reed once described as a 'Jackson stalker' - Jones began conducting deep research. Obtaining a special court order from Judge Rodney Melville, who presided over Jackson's trial, she was given access to all of the evidence and transcripts related to the case.

It took Jones days just to photocopy all of the court transcripts and a further six months to read them. The wealth of information needed for the book forced her to invest in a second computer. She used one to store all of her research and the other to store her writing. It took her a further six months to finish the manuscript.

'Michael Jackson Conspiracy' was explosive. Not only did it reveal all of the exculpatory evidence and testimony which the media had failed to present to the public, it also exposed deliberate media bias against Jackson and explained the motives behind it. The blurb described the book as follows:



"...A scathing indictment against the media for conspiring to distort, dehumanise and destroy Michael Jackson... Jones argues convincingly that the case against Jackson amounted to nothing more than a media made, tax paid scandal, and she makes an impassioned to the public at large to think critically about, question the integrity of and demand truth in 'the news'."



Despite its sensational contents and in spite of her seven previous bestsellers, Jones was unable to convince any major publishing house to print the book. She was forced to self publish.

When I interviewed Aphrodite Jones shortly after the book's release she told me that she intended to make a documentary about Jackson's trial, describing her vision for a 'TV version of the book.' Yesterday she emailed to tell me that the project is moving forward.

"The one hour docu-show I did on Michael Jackson will air during my new series called 'True Crime'," she said. "It will begin in April 2010 on a new Discovery channel called Investigation Discovery (ID)."

The hour-long film will cover Jackson's 2005 trial, the media falsehoods which surrounded it and why Jackson 'died with a broken heart' after being 'divorced by America'. Jones insists that the 2005 trial proved Jackson's innocence and says the documentary will show this.

Jones is otherwise tight lipped about the show, saying that she can't elaborate without network approval. However, fans will be ecstatic that a factual documentary on Jackson will for once air on television, as opposed to the conveyer belt of nonsense that is usually paraded before the public.
Jacques Peretti - sit down and take notes.
 
http://www.charles-thomson.net/aphrodite.html

Michael Jackson Conspiracy
Aphrodite Jones finds trouble wherever she goes. Her first book saw her take on the FBI and her most famous work resulted in a legal battle with Fox. Her latest offering sees her take on her biggest nemesis yet; the media.
June 2008, Deadline Magazine


“During my childhood, from around 8 years old, I spent a lot of time alone in my room writing,” says Aphrodite Jones. “I was punished all the time. My mother was extremely eccentric and punished me for the silliest things, like hanging a coat on the wrong hook. I spent a lot of time locked away in my room. With nothing else to do, writing became a natural outlet for me. I guess it was inevitable that I would eventually find some way of getting paid for it.”

Like much of her life, Aphrodite Jones’s childhood sounds extraordinary. Routinely punished by her ailing mother, who suffered for many years from heart disease, she was locked in her room for hours on end where her unique writing talent was allowed to develop. Jones has since channeled that talent into becoming one of America’s biggest non-fiction writers. With seven New York Times bestsellers to her name, Aphrodite Jones is an authority on America's most high profile trials and frequently covers them for Fox News.

Her latest book centres around what has been dubbed the 'trial of the century'. 'Michael Jackson Conspiracy' purports to tell the real story behind the King of Pop's 2005 child molestation trial. According to Jones, the book lifts the lid on the media's concentrated efforts to secure a guilty verdict through biased reportage. The fallout has been enormous; forced to self-publish, Jones has found herself unable to promote her book. Print media won't interview her. TV shows have recorded interviews but failed to air them. Her latest mission has been an intense uphill struggle, but Jones's career was built on her determination.

At 17 she lost her mother to a heart attack and at 21 she lost her father the same way. But by the time they passed away she had already left home to study at UCLA, where she specialised in English with a view to becoming a writer.

After she completed her studies, Jones worked for some time as a nationally syndicated feature writer but grew weary of what she calls ‘fluff journalism. She moved to Kentucky and began a career as the news director of two local radio stations.

It was during her time at the stations that Jones began covering the story of Mark Putnam, the first FBI agent ever to stand trial for homicide. Appalled by the lack of national coverage for what she describes as a historical event, Jones left town to find herself a literary agent. Within a week she landed a book deal but would soon discover that writing a book was far more difficult than she had ever imagined.

“I didn’t realise what a huge task it would be,” says Jones. “But sometimes I think being in the blind is a good thing. If I’d known before I started what a struggle it was going to be then I never would have taken it on.”

When Jones came to research the book she encountered a wall of silence from the FBI, who refused to release any information or court transcripts. After hounding the Kentucky Police Department for weeks on end she was given the name of a local FBI agent, who would help her crack the story.

Jones’s luck was short-lived, for upon its release the book, ‘The FBI Killer’, became the victim of an FBI smear campaign. The organisation branded the work a fabrication, but Jones insists that there was nothing in the book that could not be proved. “Then they tried to claim that I’d paid PR people to give my book good reviews!” exclaims Jones. “Nothing could be further from the truth… I had no money!”

To date Jones remains unable to explain how, as a first time author, she was able to take on the FBI and win, saying that she just did what she thought was right. “I went out there with no rulebook. I just had to go with my gut. The lady who was murdered was considered a mountain lady… a hillbilly. People seemed to think her death wasn’t important because she lived out in the sticks. I did it for her and I dedicated the book to her when it was finished.”

Jones is perhaps most famous for her third book, ‘All She Wanted’, a painstakingly researched account of the life and death of Teena Brandon, a young transsexual who was brutally raped and murdered in 1993. Intrigued by the local law enforcement’s refusal to treat the murder as a hate crime, Jones flew out to cover the trial in full. The resulting book has sold over 250,000 copies.

“I like to think that the book had an impact all over the world,” says Jones. “I got, and still get, lots of letters and emails from the gay community thanking me for breaking that taboo. We fear difference for no reason; there’s a reason to fear terrorism or to fear violence, but there’s no reason to fear somebody who leads an alternative lifestyle.”

So captivated were the public by the Teena Brandon case that plans were made to adapt the book into a Hollywood movie starring Drew Barrymore under Diane Keaton’s direction. The plan, says Jones, was to make the film under the same title as her book. However, Fox Searchlight later made the film without her permission, calling it ‘Boys Don’t Cry’, resulting in a legal battle between Jones and Fox. Fox settled, but Jones is legally barred from disclosing the sum.

Insisting that there are no sour grapes, Jones says she was pleased to see the story presented to a worldwide audience. “I think more people are aware of the story because of Hilary Swank’s involvement. I don’t think the film would have won the academy award with Drew Barrymore and Diane Keaton. I try to look at the bigger picture.”

Since then Jones has written six more true crime books. “When I’m looking for the subject of my next book it can’t just be a crime. It has to be unique and interesting. I like to expose new elements of our society.”

With the release of her eighth book, ‘Michael Jackson Conspiracy’, Aphrodite Jones certainly has a lot to say about our society. Such is her standing in the US literary scene that she was one of only two authors given full press credentials to cover the trial. In ‘Michael Jackson Conspiracy’ Jones rages against the media machine, exposing the mainstream media’s aggressive campaign to manufacture a guilty verdict through slanted reporting.

Jones admits to having initially been taken in by the negative media coverage of Michael Jackson. Busy covering other high profile trials in the build up to the Jackson case, she relied on fellow journalists for her background information. “The attitude that the media was pedaling was that he must be guilty because he was on trial; there is no smoke without fire. Everybody was so busy looking for smoke and fire that they completely ignored anything exculpatory. Their minds were already set.

“Their aim was to imply guilt because that’s what people want to read; salacious gossip about Michael Jackson’s life. It is the nature of the beast.”

Throughout the trial Jones remained convinced of Jackson’s guilt because, she says, she was viewing everything ‘out of context’. “I was watching through the eyes of somebody who had already been told he was guilty. I had fallen victim to this concerted effort by the media to present Jackson as guilty.”

Jones’s moment of clarity, she says, came on the day of the verdict, when she was asked live on-air by Bill O’Reilly whether she thought the jury had made the right decision. In that moment, she explains, she realised that there had been no evidence of any wrongdoing. “As I was thinking, Bill pushed me for an answer,” she says. “I told him yes, that they had definitely made the right decision.”

Three months later Jones was granted exclusive access to all evidence and transcripts from the trial. After spending several days in Santa Barbara photocopying documents it took her six months to read the trial transcripts and another six months to complete the book. When she finished, Jones realised the ‘conspiracy’ extended beyond merely the news media.

Jones, a seven time New York Times bestselling author, found herself unable to locate a publisher for her book. “I won’t name names,” she says, “but I will say that across the board, each company told me point blank that they wouldn’t print anything pro-Jackson. I was eventually forced to publish it myself in partnership with iUniverse.”

Jones was also unsuccessful in her attempts to get the book stocked in any high street stores, receiving the same frosty, anti-Jackson message. She was forced to market the book herself, touring book fairs and independent stores, and selling via her website.

The ‘conspiracy’ seemed to extend further still, as Jones describes a ‘hesitation’ on the part of the media to promote her book. A taped appearance on ‘The O’Reilly Factor’ was pulled from the show without explanation. When Jackson fans campaigned for the interview to be aired, it was cut down to only three minutes and Jones was talked over throughout the entire slot.

Jackson’s treatment at the hands of the media, says Jones, is symptomatic of a much larger societal problem. “I find it disturbing that right now the biggest story in the world is Britney Spears’s mental state. We have war, genocide, famine, nations falling apart… but we have come to a point where the media resorts to manufacturing the downfall of celebrities to boost their own ratings.

“There’s this ghoulish sense of everyday people taking pleasure in witnessing the downfall of celebrities; this morbid sense of glee at seeing those better off than ourselves being punished for their success.”

Jackson became a target, says Jones, because his downfall would have been one of the biggest money earners in media history.

“If Michael Jackson had been found guilty it would have created an entire cottage industry for the media. It would generate a story a day: Who’s visiting? Who’s not visiting? Can we interview his cellmates? Can we profile his prison wardens? Is he in solitary confinement? Can we get pictures of him in his cell? The possibilities are endless. The media has literally generated billions of dollars by writing slanderous articles about Michael Jackson and it stood to generate billions more from a guilty verdict.”

Unwilling to let the subject drop without a fight, Jones describes her next project as ‘to some extent, a TV version of the book.’ She is in the early stages of producing a series of TV documentaries revealing the truth behind high profile media cases, exposing the motives that dictated what the media did and did not tell the public.

But does she think anything can truly be done to end the media’s obsession with biased reporting and celebrity tittle-tattle?

“No,” she says. “I don’t think the situation will ever be corrected now. There is too much money involved – too much temptation for producers to resort to cheap tactics. But I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing. I’m not finished with this yet…”
 
Things like this are encouraging and positive. I just hope people watch.

It seems to me the ones who really need to watch never do.
 
Cool! I hope someone will put it on youTube once it has aired because non US fans want to see it too!
 
look what i found...she was on "the match game" in 1978 while attending UCLA.
AphroditeJones4.jpg
 
Great news! :clapping: I have Ms Jones' book but still haven't got round to reading it.
 
That's really great news! I haven't yet got the opportunity to read her book completely but I will do it definitely some day.

Thanks for posting!
 
great news.

I want to support everything that lady does.
 
I've been planning to buy this book for the past year but I haven't had much extra cash. I will certainly do so asap. The reviews I've read have been great
 
I have her book, it's really good. If you want to know what really went down during that court case...buy this book!
 
Gee, why I am feeling angry again? :angry: Argh!

Thank you, Aprodite, for telling it as it is! :clapping:Yeah, I hope the show will air at some point in Europe or that we'll at least have an upload on youtube. Btw, if there's anyone out there who still hasn't read her book, even though you know all about the case, it's still totally worth the read.
 
This will reach more people than any book. Because to be frank, only fans were buying her work and most hardly need convicting on the case.
 
isn't it something that being found not guilty in court isn't enough to prove his innocence, but let a media personality say it and suddenly people "might" accept it. good for Aphrodite, but society...smh
 
Hopefully this will be shown on UK tv. Not many journos were willing to change their minds about Michael and Jones should be applauded for this. So many believed he was innocent but kept quiet about it as that's not what gets you the big scoops which is so disgusting.
 
isn't it something that being found not guilty in court isn't enough to prove his innocence, but let a media personality say it and suddenly people "might" accept it. good for Aphrodite, but society...smh
Yeah, well, if you wanted to be really hardcore you could say that being found 'not guilty' simply means that there was a reasonable doubt... i.e. no evidence or not enough evidence to convict someone. The jury can only believe or not believe the prosecution. They weren't pesonally there when the alleged 'crime' took place, they aren't the person being charged themselves and they don't personally know the person being charged, so it's left up to cold, hard facts... and intuition. But if it's in the media's best interest (see: money) to promote the idea that someone's innocent/wrongly-accused they'll say the "jury found them innocent", otherwise they'll gleefully declare that "a not guilty verdict doesn't actually mean they're innocent" :mello:
 
Yeah, well, if you wanted to be really hardcore you could say that being found 'not guilty' simply means that there was a reasonable doubt... i.e. no evidence or not enough evidence to convict someone. The jury can only believe or not believe the prosecution. They weren't pesonally there when the alleged 'crime' took place, they aren't the person being charged themselves and they don't personally know the person being charged, so it's left up to cold, hard facts... and intuition. But if it's in the media's best interest (see: money) to promote the idea that someone's innocent/wrongly-accused they'll say the "jury found them innocent", otherwise they'll gleefully declare that "a not guilty verdict doesn't actually mean they're innocent" :mello:

i don't know what you mean by hardcore, but if you mean sticking to technicalities... then in this country you INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. So yes I AM hardcore in my unwavering position that Michael is Innocent, and so Proven in Court by 10 NOT GUILTY Verdicts.

 
Bravo Aphrodite... :clap:

You know what makes me UPSET? It's the fact that Michael was Destroyed by this B.S. "Trial", and He is now gone! and the fact that THE Media WORLD (i'd say the "Illuminati") is Actually ruling the media!


I'm glad that I bought her book in 2007 when it was released cuz right i wanted to order more for other ppl. who asked me to get it for them, but every where i call, they say, THERE is NOmore print and that i need to order it, and when I do, they would never get back to me!...

so Kudos Aphrodite for speaking up.

and have y'all seen "Boys don't cry"? with Hilary Swank! It is one distrubing movie...very sad.


Thankyou for posting this!


L.O.V.E.
Romi
 
i don't know what you mean by hardcore, but if you mean sticking to technicalities... then in this country you INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. So yes I AM hardcore in my unwavering position that Michael is Innocent, and so Proven in Court by 10 NOT GUILTY Verdicts.

Hey I just reialized something...The verdict was on the 7th day!!!:eek:



IT Made me cry...:cry: I'dnt survive this if it were me. Michael Is Very strong.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top